This paper presents a case of reversible dysphasia occurring in a patient prescribed atorvastatin in combination with indapamide. A milder dysphasia recurred with the prescription of rosuvastatin and was documented on clinical examination. This resolved following cessation of rosuvastatin. The case highlights both a need for a wider understanding of potential drug interactions through the CYP 450 system and for an increased awareness, questioning and reporting of drug side-effects.
Anticholesteremic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use ; Anxiety/diagnosis ; Aphasia/diagnosis/*etiology ; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/metabolism ; Depression/diagnosis ; Drug Interactions ; Female ; Fluorobenzenes/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Heptanoic Acids/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy ; Indapamide/therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Pyrimidines/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Pyrroles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Sulfonamides/adverse effects/*therapeutic use

OBJECTIVESThis study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin on treating Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia.

METHODSThis randomized double-blind multi-center study enrolled the patients with LDL-C > or = 160 mg/dL but < 250 mg/dL and TG < 400 mg/dL after six-week dietary run-in. Patients were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg/d (R) or atorvastatin (A) 10 mg/d in 2:1 ratio for 12 weeks. Patients with LDL-C levels not reaching goal defined by ATP III guideline in R group were titrated to 20 mg for additional 8 weeks.

RESULTSAltogether, 304 patients were included in the study, 201 patients in R group and 103 in A group. The ITT population is 290 and PP is 263. The LDL-C level decreased after 12 weeks in R group than that in A group, (45.6% vs 39.0%, P < 0.001). The rate reaching the target level defined by ATP III in R group tended to be higher than that in A group (78.0% vs 72.7%), especially in patients with high risk (56.5% vs 35%), however the difference did not reach statistical significance. The magnitudes of TG reduction (-22.8%), HDL-C (+6.6%) and ApoA-1 increase (+12.5%) in R group had no significant difference compared to those in A group (-16.6%, +4.3% and +9.8%, respectively). 29 patients were titrated to receive 20 mg of rosuvastatin. 10 of 22 patients reached the LDL-C target. There were no drug related SAE found during the study.

CONCLUSIONSThe efficacy of rosuvastatin in reducing LDL-C is more effective than atorvastatin in the same dose, however, the safety data is similar between them in the period of 3-month follow-up.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anticholesteremic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Atorvastatin Calcium ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Fluorobenzenes ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Heptanoic Acids ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hypercholesterolemia ; drug therapy ; Hypolipidemic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pyrimidines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Pyrroles ; therapeutic use ; Rosuvastatin Calcium ; Sulfonamides ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy of atorvastatin in preventing contrast agent-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing coronary angiography and explore the mechanism.

METHODSA total of 180 patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were randomized into regular dose and high dose atorvastatin groups (n=90). Serum creatinine (Scr), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), cystatin, peripheral blood levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) before and after the procedure were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSThe incidence of CIN was significantly lower in high-dose atorvastatin group than in the regular dose group. At 48-72 h after the surgery, serum Scr and cystatin levels were significantly lower and eGFR was significantly higher in the high-dose group. At 24 h after the surgery, MPO and MDA levels were significantly lower, and SOD activity was significantly higher in high-dose group than in the regular dose group.

CONCLUSIONHigh-dose atorvastatin used before angiography is more effective than the regular dose in attenuating contrast agent-induced renal dysfunction, and its mechanism is related with the inhibition of oxidative stress.

Aged ; Atorvastatin Calcium ; Contrast Media ; adverse effects ; Coronary Angiography ; adverse effects ; Female ; Heptanoic Acids ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Kidney Diseases ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Oxidative Stress ; drug effects ; Pyrroles ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in Chinese patients with RA enrolled in Phase 3 and long-term extension (LTE) studies. Methods: ORAL Sync was a 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial. Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo advanced to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID at 3 or 6 months. All patients remained on ≥1 background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. ORAL Sequel is an open-label LTE study (data-cut: March 2015; data collection and analyses were ongoing, and study database was not locked at the time of analysis; study was closed in 2017). Efficacy outcomes: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response rates and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]). Patient- and physician-reported outcomes: Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis, and pain (visual analog scale). Safety was assessed throughout. Results: ORAL Sync included 218 patients; 192 were subsequently enrolled into ORAL Sequel. In ORAL Sync, more patients achieved ACR20 (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 67.4%; 10 mg BID, 70.6%; placebo, 34.1%) and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 7.1%; 10 mg BID, 13.1%; placebo, 2.3%) with tofacitinib versus placebo at Month 6. Mean changes from baseline in HAQ-DI were greater with tofacitinib versus placebo at Month 6. In ORAL Sequel, efficacy was consistent to Month 48. Incidence rates for adverse events of special interest in tofacitinib-treated patients were similar to the global population. Conclusions: Tofacitinib significantly reduced signs/symptoms and improved physical function and quality of life in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severely active RA up to Month 48. The safety profile was consistent with the global population. Clinical Trial Identifier NCT00856544 and NCT00413699.
Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; drug therapy ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Piperidines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Pyrimidines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Pyrroles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult

BACKGROUNDFamitinib is a novel and potent multitargeting receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The phase I clinical study showed that famitinib was well tolerated and had a broad anti-tumor spectrum. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of famitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODSThe data of famitinib in treating patients with mRCC from the single-center phases I and II clinical trials were analyzed. Famitinib was administered orally at the dose of 13-30 mg once daily until tumor progression, occurrence of intolerable adverse reactions or withdrawal of the informed consent.

RESULTSA total of 24 patients with mRCC were treated including 17 patients at a dose of 25 mg once daily, 4 patients at a dose of 27 mg and 1 patient each at a dose of 13 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg, respectively. Twelve (50.0%) patients achieved partial response (PR) and 9 patients achieved stable disease (SD). Progressive disease was found in 3 (12.5%) patients. The disease control rate was 87.5%. The median follow-up time was 17.6 months; the median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.7 (95% CI 7.0-14.4) months; and the estimated median overall survival (OS) time was 33.0 (95% CI 8.7-57.3) months. The adverse drug reactions mainly included hypertension (54.1%), hand-foot skin reactions (45.8%), diarrhea (33.3%), mucositis (29.2%), neutropenia (45.8%), thrombocytopenia (29.2%), hyperlipidemia (41.7%) and proteinuria (41.7%). The incidence rate of grades 3 and 4 adverse events was low, mainly including hypertension 12.5%, hand-foot skin reactions 4.2%, neutropenia 4.2%, thrombocytopenia 4.2%, hyperlipidemia 4.2% and proteinuria 12.5%.

CONCLUSIONSFamitinib has significant anti-tumor activity in mRCC. The common adverse reactions are generally manageable.

Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Indoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Kidney Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Male ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors ; Pyrroles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (5 and 10 mg twice daily) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases as well as manual searches. RESULTS: Five RCTs, including three phase-II and two phase-III trials involving 1,590 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The three phase-II RCTs included 452 patients with RA (144 patients randomized to 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 156 patients randomized to 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, and 152 patients randomized to placebo) who were included in this meta-analysis. The American College of Rheumatology 20% response rate was significantly higher in the tofacitinib 5- and 10-mg groups than in the control group (relative risk [RR], 2.445; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.229 to 4.861; p = 0.011; and RR, 2.597; 95% CI, 1.514 to 4.455; p = 0.001, respectively). The safety outcomes did not differ between the tofacitinib 5- and 10-mg groups and placebo groups with the exception of infection in the tofacitinib 10-mg group (RR, 2.133; 95% CI, 1.268 to 3.590; p = 0.004). The results of two phase-III trials (1,123 patients) confirmed the findings in the phase-II studies. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib at dosages of 5 and 10 mg twice daily was found to be effective in patients with active RA that inadequately responded to methotrexate or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and showed a manageable safety profile.
Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/*drug therapy ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ; Humans ; Janus Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors ; Methotrexate/therapeutic use ; Piperidines/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Pyrimidines/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Pyrroles/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome

Sunitinib as a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor is one of the anti-tumor agents, approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to use treat gastrointestinal stromal tumor and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The agent is known to commonly induce adverse reactions such as fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, stomatitis, esophagitis, hypertension, skin toxicity, reduciton in cardiac output of left ventricle, and hypothyroidism. However, it has been reported to rarely induce adverse reactions such as nephrotic syndrome and irreversible reduction in renal functions, and cases of intestinal perforation or pneumatosis interstinalis as such reactions have been consistently reported. In this report, a 66-year old man showing abdominal pain had renal cell carcinoma and history of sunitinib at a dosage of 50 mg/day on a 4-weeks-on, 2-weeks-off schedule. Seven days after the third cycle he was referred to the hospital because of abdominal pain. Computed tomography showed pneumoperitoneum with linear pneumatosis intestinalis in his small bowel. The patient underwent surgical exploration that confirmed the pneumatosis intestinalis at 100 cm distal to Treitz's ligament. We report a rare case of intestinal perforation with pneumatosis intestinalis after administration of sunitinib to a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell/*drug therapy ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Humans ; Indoles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Intestinal Perforation/*diagnosis/etiology/surgery ; Kidney Neoplasms/*drug therapy ; Lung/radiography ; Male ; Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis/*diagnosis/etiology ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Pyrroles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUNDThe tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib, the first targeted agent for the first line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in treating metastatic clear-cell RCC and to confirm if hypertension is an effective predictive factor.

METHODSA total of 36 patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled between June 2008 and December 2010. Among them 29 cases were first line therapy and 7 cases were in progression on first-line cytokine or sorafinib therapy. The pathology of all patients was confirmed predominant in clear cell type. Sunitinib mono-therapy was administered in repeated 6-week cycles of daily oral therapy for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off in 34 patients; and 3 patients were administered with 37.5 mg/d continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred. Overall response rate and safety were evaluated. We divided patients into Group A and Group B according to the blood pressure level.

RESULTSThe median follow-up was 15 months (10 cycles, range 1.5 - 30.0 months (1 - 20 cycles)). Ten patients (29.4%) achieved partial responses (PR); 23 patients (67.6%) demonstrated stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 2 cycles. Seventeen patients (50%) developed progressive disease (PD) during follow-up. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (range 3.0 - 28.5) months. A total of 9 patients died; the overall survival has not been reached; the median survival time of the deceased patients was 13 months (range 7 - 24) months. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (77.8%), thrombocytopenia (75.0%), hypertension (61.1%) and diarrhea (46.0%). Most adverse events were reversible by treatment interruption. Twenty-two patients (61.1%) developed hypertension; and hypertension was associated with a long time to disease progression and long overall survival (P = 0.004, 0.000, respectively).

CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study demonstrate the efficacy and manageable adverse event profile of sunitinib as a single agent in first- or second-line therapy for patients with metastatic clear cell RCC. Further, sunitinib-associated hypertension may be a strong predictive marker for treatment efficacy in metastatic RCC.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Indoles ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pyrroles ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

To investigate the effect of atorvastatin on reflow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its relation to serum uric acid levels.One hundred and fourteen STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups:55 cases received oral atorvastatin 20 mg before PCI (routine dose group) and 59 cases received oral atorvastatin 80 mg before PCI (high dose group). According to the initial serum uric acid level, patients in two groups were further divided into normal uric acid subgroup and hyperuricemia subgroup. The changes of uric acid level and coronary artery blood flow after PCI were observed. Correlations between the decrease of uric acid, the dose of atorvastatin and the blood flow of coronary artery after PCI were analyzed.Serum uric acid levels were decreased after treatment in both groups (all<0.05), and patients with hyperuricemia showed more significant decrease in serum uric acid level (<0.05). Compared with the routine dose group, serum uric acid level in patients with hyperuricemia decreased more significantly in the high dose group (<0.05), but no significant difference was observed between patients with normal serum uric acid levels in two groups (>0.05). Among 114 patients, there were 19 cases without reflow after PCI (16.7%). In the routine dose group, there were 12 patients without reflow, in which 3 had normal uric acid and 9 had high uric acid levels (<0.01). In the high dose group, there were 7 patients without reflow, in which 2 had normal uric acid and 5 had high uric acid (<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that hyperuricemia was one of independent risk factors for no-reflow after PCI (=1.01, 95%:1.01-1.11,<0.01). The incidence of no-flow after PCI in the routine dose group was 21.8% (12/55), and that in the high dose group was 11.9% (7/59) (<0.01).High dose atorvastatin can decrease serum uric acid levels and improve reflow after PCI in patients with STEMI.
Acute Disease ; Atorvastatin Calcium ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Heptanoic Acids ; Humans ; Hyperuricemia ; complications ; drug therapy ; Male ; Myocardial Reperfusion ; methods ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; adverse effects ; Pyrroles ; Risk Factors ; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction ; surgery ; Uric Acid ; blood ; metabolism