1.Quantitative analysis of changes of automated perimetric thresholds after pupillary dilation and induced myopia in normal subjects.
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 1994;8(2):53-60
We quantitatively analyzed the changes of the (retinal) threshold sensitivities between normal status and dilated emmetropic status, and between dilated emmetropic status and -1.0D induced myopic status. Three consecutive visual field examinations by Humphrey Field Analyzer C-30-2 threshold test and STATPAC program were performed in 36 eyes of 21 normal subjects who ranged in age from 23 to 40 years. The results were as follows: 1) There was a statistically significant decrease (0.87 +/- 0.91dB)in the mean threshold sensitivity within the central 30 degrees at the dilated emmetropic status (27.90dB) as compared with the normal status (28.77dB)(p = 0.0001). 2) There was a statistically significant decrease(0.99 +/- 0.61dB) at -1.0D induced myopic status(26.91dB) as compared with the dilated emmetropic status(27.90dB)(p = 0.0001). 3) After dilation, the mean threshold sensitivity between 20 and 30 degrees of field showed statistically significant decrease as compared with those within the central 20 degrees of visual field(p < 0.05). In case of -1.0D induced myopia, there were uniform decreases in the mean threshold sensitivities within the central 30 degrees of visual field (p > 0.05). Therefore, we emphasize the importance of consistent pupillary size and correct refractive state in performing the serial automated visual field tests.
Adult
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Myopia/etiology/*physiopathology
;
Pupil/drug effects
;
Pupil Disorders/chemically induced/*physiopathology
;
Retina/physiology
;
Sensory Thresholds/*physiology
;
Tropicamide/pharmacology
;
Visual Field Tests
;
Visual Fields/*physiology
2.Action of miosis of 1% pilocarpine liposome in rabbits.
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2003;25(3):343-345
OBJECTIVETo compare the action of miosis of 1% pilocarpine liposome with 1% pilocarpine solution in rabbits.
METHODS18 white rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups. Test group received 1% pilocarpine liposome, positive control group received 1% pilocarpine solution, negative control group received liposome. Each eye drop instilled into left eye of rabbits and sterile saline solution instilled into right eye as control. The pupil diameter was measured at time intervals of beginning, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 hours.
RESULTSThe mean pupil diameter change of 3 groups in both eyes was not significant (P > 0.05) at beginning. The strongest action of miosis took place 0.25 h in positive control group and 0.5 h in test group after instillation. The dilation of pupil in both groups took place 1 h and 3 h, and the restoration of pupil in both groups took place at 5 h and 7 h. The mean pupil diameter of negative control group was not significant in seven hours.
CONCLUSIONSThe results suggest that 1% pilocarpine liposome improves the bioavailability and prolong the duration of its action.
Animals ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Female ; Liposomes ; pharmacology ; Male ; Miotics ; pharmacology ; Pilocarpine ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Pupil ; drug effects ; Rabbits ; Random Allocation
3.Pupillary response in patients receiving intrathecal sufentanil.
Yi-Chun WANG ; Qu-Lian GUO ; E WANG ; Tao ZHONG ; Chang-Sheng HUANG ; Jing PENG
Chinese Medical Journal 2007;120(14):1274-1276
4.The Comparison of Mydriatic Effect Between Two Drugs of Different Mechanism.
Ji Hyun PARK ; Young Chun LEE ; Se Youp LEE
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;23(1):40-42
PURPOSE: To maximize effective use of mydriatic drugs through comparing the pupillary dilation effects between 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine. METHODS: Fifty people requiring pupillary dilation were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 was treated with one drop of 1% tropicamide in the right eye and one drop of 2.5% phenylephrine in the left eye. Group 2 was treated twice during a 5-minute interval with 1% tropicamide in the right eye. Group 3 was treated twice during a 5-minute interval with 2.5% phenylephrine in the right eye. Groups 2 and 3 were treated with 2.5% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide in the left eye, administered during a 5-minute interval. The pupillary size was measured in all groups for 40 minutes following eye drops administration. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 15.7 years. Group 1 included 10 patients, and groups 2 and 3 included 20 patients each. Eight patients in group 1 and 16 patients in group 2 developed a larger right pupil. Fourteen patients in group 3 developed a larger left pupil. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that 1% tropicamide, with its parasympathetic antagonistic mechanism of action, was more effective at inducing pupillary dilation than 2.5% phenylephrine, and the combination of 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine was more effective than multiple drops of single eye drops.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Muscarinic Antagonists/*administration & dosage
;
Mydriatics/*administration & dosage
;
Ophthalmic Solutions
;
Phenylephrine/*administration & dosage
;
Pupil/*drug effects
;
Refractive Errors/diagnosis/physiopathology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tropicamide/*administration & dosage
;
Young Adult
5.A Pharmacologic Pupillary Test in the Diagnosis of Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy.
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;23(4):291-295
PURPOSE: To screen for diabetic autonomic neuropathy of the pupil using 0.5% apraclonidine and 0.1% pilocarpine and to evaluate the early diagnostic value of this pharmacologic pupillary test by assessing the relationship between pupillary and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathies. METHODS: A total of 22 diabetic patients were recruited. Baseline pupillary diameter (PD) and the difference in PD between the test eye and the control eye before and after instillation of apraclonidine and pilocarpine were measured. All patients also underwent cardiovascular autonomic function (CAF) testing. RESULTS: Baseline PD in room light correlated with duration of diabetes mellitus (DM, p=0.049) and the presence of DM retinopathy (DMR, p=0.022). Eleven patients (50%) had positive apraclonidine tests, and two patients had positive pilocarpine tests. The patients who had positive pilocarpine tests also had positive apraclonidine tests. Patients who had a positive pupillary test had a significantly higher rate of positive CAF tests (p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Pupillary autonomic neuropathy was related to the duration of diabetes and the degree of DMR. There was also a significant correlation between pupillary autonomic neuropathy and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN). Also, sympathetic nerve dysfunction occurred prior to parasympathetic dysfunction in this study. A simple pharmacologic pupillary test can help manage complications in diabetic patients because patients with pupillary autonomic dysfunction have an increased risk of CAN.
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/administration & dosage/diagnostic use
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Clonidine/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives/diagnostic use
;
Diabetic Nephropathies/*diagnosis/physiopathology
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Miosis/*chemically induced/physiopathology
;
Miotics/administration & dosage/diagnostic use
;
Ophthalmic Solutions
;
Pilocarpine/administration & dosage/*diagnostic use
;
Pupil/drug effects/*physiology
;
Reproducibility of Results