1.Greetings from the New Editor-in-Chief.
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2017;5(2):53-53
No abstract available.
Journalism, Medical*
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing*
;
Periodicals as Topic
;
Editorial Policies
;
Databases, Bibliographic
2.New start.
Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health 2017;41(2):71-72
No abstract available.
Dental Research
;
Journalism, Dental
;
Periodicals as Topic
;
Peer Review
;
Publishing
3.Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection.
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2018;24(2):137-143
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Eight years have passed since Clinical and Molecular Hepatology changed its language policy to English-only in September 2010. The journal has been included in PubMed Central since September 2010. Present title continues the Korean Journal of Hepatology since June 2012. It has been indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection as an Emerging Sources Citation Index journal since 2015. I sought to determine whether the change in language policy was successful based on journal metrics. I also investigated whether the journal has become one of the top-ranked world journals in the category of gastroenterology and hepatology. METHODS: The following journal metrics were calculated or analyzed based on the journal’s bibliographic information from 2012 to 2017 and the Web of Science Core Collection database: citable and non-citable articles, country of authors, total cites, impact factor, the immediacy index, country of citing authors, citing journal titles, and the Hirsch index. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2017, there were 282 citable articles. Authors from 29 countries have published in the journal. The number of total citations in 2017 was 611. The impact factor increased from 2.1 in 2014 to 2.8 in 2017. The citing authors were from 85 countries, and their papers have been cited in 663 journals. The Hirsch index was 19. CONCLUSIONS: Based on journal metrics, Clinical and Molecular Hepatology has succeeded in becoming a top-ranked international journal 8 years after changing its language policy to English-only.
Bibliometrics
;
Editorial Policies
;
Gastroenterology*
;
Open Access Publishing
4.Journal publishing in our connected world.
Singapore medical journal 2019;60(1):1-2
5.Authorship and Contributorship in Scholarly Journals.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(6):801-802
No abstract available.
*Authorship
;
Editorial Policies
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing
6.Why Double-Blind Review Is Preferable for Scholarly Journals.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(10):1438-1438
No abstract available.
*Editorial Policies
;
Humans
;
*Journalism, Medical
;
Peer Review, Research/*methods
7.Revisiting the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2019;34(13):e99-
No abstract available.
Open Access Publishing
8.Letter to the Editor: An Indian Perspective on Universal Open Access Publishing: Think of the Fire before Venturing Out of the Frying Pan!
Durga Prasanna MISRA ; Vinod RAVINDRAN ; Aman SHARMA ; Anupam WAKHLU ; Sakir AHMED ; Vir Singh NEGI ; Vikas AGARWAL
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(8):85-
No abstract available.
Fires
;
Open Access Publishing
9.Duplicate Publication Rate Decline in Korean Medical Journals.
Soo Young KIM ; Chong Woo BAE ; Chang Kok HAHM ; Hye Min CHO
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(2):172-175
The purpose of this study was to examine trends in duplicate publication in Korean medical articles indexed in the KoreaMed database from 2004 to 2009, before and after a campaign against scientific misconduct launched by the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors in 2006. The study covered period from 2007 to 2012; and 5% of the articles indexed in KoreaMed were retrieved by random sampling. Three authors reviewed full texts of the retrieved articles. The pattern of duplicate publication, such as copy, salami slicing (fragmentation), and aggregation (imalas), was also determined. Before the launching ethics campaign, the national duplication rate in medical journals was relatively high: 5.9% in 2004, 6.0% in 2005, and 7.2% in 2006. However, duplication rate steadily declined to 4.5% in 2007, 2.8% in 2008, and 1.2 % in 2009. Of all duplicated articles, 53.4% were classified as copies, 27.8% as salami slicing, and 18.8% as aggregation (imalas). The decline in duplicate publication rate took place as a result of nationwide campaigns and monitoring by KoreaMed and KoreaMed Synapse, starting from 2006.
Databases, Factual
;
*Duplicate Publication as Topic
;
Humans
;
Journalism, Medical
;
Publishing/ethics/*statistics & numerical data/trends
;
Republic of Korea
;
Research Personnel/ethics
10.Selecting Your Editorial Board: Maintaining Standards.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(7):972-973
No abstract available.
*Editorial Policies
;
Periodicals as Topic
;
Publishing