1.The legend of the KJU.
Korean Journal of Urology 2015;56(12):789-790
No abstract available.
Humans
;
Names
;
Periodicals as Topic/*trends
;
Publishing/trends
;
Republic of Korea
;
Urology/*trends
2.Looking beyond.
Korean Journal of Urology 2015;56(7):477-477
No abstract available.
Humans
;
Periodicals as Topic/standards/*trends
;
Publishing/standards/trends
;
Republic of Korea
;
Urology/standards/*trends
3."Three kingdoms" to romance.
Jun YU ; Jian WANG ; Fuchu HE ; Huanming YANG
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2003;1(1):1-1
4.Global Trends in Medical Journal Publishing.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(8):1120-1121
No abstract available.
Databases, Factual
;
Humans
;
Internet
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing/*trends
5.Global Trends in Medical Journal Publishing.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(8):1120-1121
No abstract available.
Databases, Factual
;
Humans
;
Internet
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing/*trends
6.A Scopus-Based Analysis of Publication Activity in Kazakhstan from 2010 to 2015: Positive Trends, Concerns, and Possible Solutions.
Marlen YESSIRKEPOV ; Bekaidar NURMASHEV ; Mariya ANARTAYEVA
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(12):1915-1919
The article analyzes the publication activity of scientific authors from Kazakhstan based on Scopus and SCImago Journal & Country Rank data from 2010 to 2015. The number of indexed multidisciplinary and medical articles from the country has been steadily growing from 2011 onward and this can be due to the adoption of the new Law on Science in that year. Several regulatory legal acts have been issued in recent years aimed at improving the quality of local journals and the international recognition of academic degrees and titles. Publication activity of scientific authors from Kazakhstan was found to be higher than that from other countries in the Central Asian region. However, there are still many unresolved issues related to the English language barrier, lack of indexing status of local journals, and poor topical education on science writing and editing. As such, the number of articles published in 'predatory' journals remains sizable, and there are concerns over authors' negligence and plagiarism. The global solution to the discussed problems may be achieved by educating researchers, authors, reviewers, and editors.
Bibliometrics
;
Humans
;
Kazakhstan
;
Language
;
Periodicals as Topic
;
Publications/ethics/legislation & jurisprudence/*trends
;
Publishing/trends
;
Scientific Misconduct
7.Characteristics and Trends of Orthopedic Publications between 2000 and 2009.
Kyoung Min LEE ; Mi Sun RYU ; Chin Youb CHUNG ; In Ho CHOI ; Dae Gyu KWON ; Tae Won KIM ; Ki Hyuk SUNG ; Sang Gyo SEO ; Moon Seok PARK
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2011;3(3):225-229
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to investigate the trends of orthopedic publications during the last decade, and to document the country of origin, journal, funding source, and language of contribution using PubMed. METHODS: Orthopedic articles published between 2000 and 2009 were retrieved from PubMed using the following search terms: "orthopaedic[Affiliation] AND ("2000/1/1"[PDAT]: "2009/12/31"[PDAT])" and "orthopedic[Affiliation] AND ("2000/1/1"[PDAT]: "2009/12/31"[PDAT])." The articles were downloaded in XML file format, which contained the following information: article title, author names, journal names, publication dates, article types, languages, authors' affiliations and funding sources. These information was extracted, sorted, and rearranged using the database's management software. We investigated the annual number of published orthopedic articles worldwide and the annual rate of increase. Furthermore, the country of publication origin, journal, funding source, and language of contribution were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 46,322 orthopedic articles were published and registered in PubMed in the last 10 years. The worldwide number of published orthopedic articles increased from 2,889 in 2000 to 6,909 in 2009, showing an annual increase of 384.6 articles, or an annualized compound rate of 10.2%. The United States ranked highest in the number of published orthopedic articles, followed by Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Republic of Korea. Among the orthopedic articles published worldwide during the last 10 years, 37.9% pertained studies performed in the United States. Fifty-seven point three percent (57.3%) of articles were published in journals established in the United States. Among the published orthopaedic articles, 4,747 articles (10.2%) disclosed financial support by research funds, of which 4,688 (98.8%) articles utilized research funds from the United States. Most articles were published in English (97.2%, 45,030 articles). CONCLUSIONS: The number of published orthopedic articles has been increasing over the last decade. The number of orthopedic articles, journals publication, and funding sources were dominated by research conducted in the United States, while share and growth of Asian countries including Japan, the Republic of Korea, and China were notable.
*Bibliometrics
;
Humans
;
Orthopedics/*statistics & numerical data
;
Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data
;
Publishing/*statistics & numerical data/trends
8.Choosing the Target Journal: Do Authors Need a Comprehensive Approach?.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(8):1117-1119
No abstract available.
Authorship
;
Humans
;
Journal Impact Factor
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing/*trends
;
Socioeconomic Factors
9.Choosing the Target Journal: Do Authors Need a Comprehensive Approach?.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(8):1117-1119
No abstract available.
Authorship
;
Humans
;
Journal Impact Factor
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing/*trends
;
Socioeconomic Factors
10.Trends in Nursing Research in Korea: Research Trends for Studies Published from the Inaugural Issue to 2010 in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing and the Journals Published by Member Societies under Korean Academy of Nursing Science.
Myoung Ae CHOE ; Nam Cho KIM ; Kyung Mi KIM ; Sung Jae KIM ; Kyung Sook PARK ; Young Soon BYEON ; Sung Rae SHIN ; Soo YANG ; Kyung Sook LEE ; Eun Hyun LEE ; In Sook LEE ; Tae Wha LEE ; Myung Ok CHO ; Jin Hak KIM
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2014;44(5):484-494
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify trends for studies published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing and journals published by member societies from inaugural issues to 2010. METHODS: A total of 6890 studies were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Quantitative studies accounted for 83.6% while qualitative studies accounted for 14.4%. Most frequently used research designs were quasi-experimental (91.1%) for experimental research and survey (85.2%) for non-experimental research. Most frequent study participants were healthy people (35.8%), most frequent nursing interventions, nursing skills (53.5%), and 39.8% used knowledge, attitude and behavior outcomes for dependent variables. Most frequently used keyword was elderly. Survey studies decreased from 1991 to 2010 by approximately 50%, while qualitative studies increased by about 20%. True experimental research (1.2%) showed no significant changes. Studies focusing on healthy populations increased from 2001-2005 (37.5%) to 2006-2010 (41.0%). From 1970 to 2010, studies using questionnaire accounted for over 50% whereas physiological measurement, approximately 5% only. Experimental studies using nursing skill interventions increased from 1970-1980 (30.4%) to 2006-2010 (64.0%). No significant changes were noted in studies using knowledge, attitude and behavior (39.9% ) as dependent variables. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that further expansion of true experimental, qualitative studies and physiological measurements are needed.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Humans
;
Nursing Research/ethics/*trends
;
*Publishing
;
*Qualitative Research
;
Republic of Korea
;
Research Design