1.Construction of evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services.
Yong YU ; Lijian TAO ; Tubao YANG
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2014;39(5):511-516
OBJECTIVE:
To develop a scientific and effective evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services.
METHODS:
Through 2 rounds of expert evaluation, based on the relative importance of expert scoring on each index, index was screened according to the scores of mean and coefficient of variation and the weight were determined.
RESULTS:
The two rounds of consulting experts response rates were more than 90%, and the average authority coefficients were 0.779 and 0.781. The coordination coefficients were 0.229 and 0.349. The evaluation index system of basic public health services was composed of 3 first level, 17 second level and 47 third level indicators after 2 rounds of consultation.
CONCLUSION
The evaluation index system of basic public health services is reasonable, and it can be used to evaluate the equalization of basic public health services.
Health Services
;
standards
;
Health Services Research
;
Public Health
;
standards
6.Vaccination in the primary care setting: when is it safe to proceed?
Hui Lee Sharon NGOH ; Mark Chung Wai NG
Singapore medical journal 2016;57(1):3-7
Primary care practitioners play an important role in administering and advocating vaccinations against vaccine-preventable infectious diseases and ensuring herd immunity in our population. This is a follow-up article to an earlier one which dealt with the principles of vaccine scheduling and administration. This article describes several false contraindications to vaccination that a primary care practitioner may encounter, including pregnancy, current breastfeeding, history of febrile seizures, and having immunosuppressed or pregnant household contacts. We aimed to provide a guide for safe and timely vaccine administration in the primary care setting.
Humans
;
Primary Health Care
;
standards
;
Public Health
;
Safety
;
Vaccination
;
methods
;
standards
7.Modified Delphi method in the constitution of school sanitation standard.
Xunqiang YIN ; Ying LIANG ; Hongzhuan TAN ; Wenjie GONG ; Jing DENG ; Jiayou LUO ; Xiaokang DI ; Yue WU
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2012;37(11):1104-1107
OBJECTIVE:
To constitute school sanitation standard using modified Delphi method, and to explore the feasibility and the predominance of Delphi method in the constitution of school sanitation standard.
METHODS:
Two rounds of expert consultations were adopted in this study. The data were analyzed with SPSS15.0 to screen indices of school sanitation standard.
RESULTS:
Thirty-two experts accomplished the 2 rounds of consultations. The average length of expert service was (24.69 ±8.53) years. The authority coefficient was 0.729 ±0.172. The expert positive coefficient was 94.12% (32/34) in the first round and 100% (32/32) in the second round. The harmonious coefficients of importance, feasibility and rationality in the second round were 0.493 (P<0.05), 0.527 (P<0.01), and 0.535 (P<0.01), respectively, suggesting unanimous expert opinions. According to the second round of consultation, 38 indices were included in the framework.
CONCLUSION
Theoretical analysis, literature review, investigation and so on are generally used in health standard constitution currently. Delphi method is a rapid, effective and feasible method in this field.
China
;
Delphi Technique
;
Feasibility Studies
;
Hygiene
;
standards
;
Public Health Administration
;
methods
;
Schools
;
standards
9.Evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services.
Yong YU ; Lijian TAO ; Tubao YANG
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2015;40(4):421-427
OBJECTIVE:
To establish the evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services and to test its value in practice.
METHODS:
We developed the index system through expert scored evaluation and then chose a city in Hunan for the research object. The sources of data and the methods of collection for each indicator were identified. The reliability and validity of index system was tested. The methods of AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution) were applied to comprehensively evaluate the public health services among nine counties in the city.
RESULTS:
The Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which described reliability test result on evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services, was 0.750. The cumulative contribution rate reached 89.32% after validity test with extraction of 5 common factors through factor-analysis. The sorting results from AHP or TOPSIS method are very close except two districts.
CONCLUSION
Evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services established in this study is in good validity and reliability, which can be objectively applied to analyze the current status of basic public health services.
China
;
Health Services
;
standards
;
Health Services Research
;
Public Health
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Surveys and Questionnaires