OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare the perceptions of the rural healthcare service improvement project' performance and reorganization of public health centers between project staffs and local residents. METHODS: Data collection from this study was performed in 141 project areas using structured questionnaires. Data analysis was used in SPSS 22.0 version. RESULTS: The public health center staffs were more positive about the items for improving health facilities than the local residents. Residents in the Si area generally perceived performance as more positive than residents in the Gun area, while public health center staffs in the Gun area perceived performance as more positive than public health center staffs in the Si area. Local residents expressed negative opinions about the reduction in the number of branches of public health clinics and health medical clinics. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, careful improvement projects for rural health care and the establishment of health care systems will be necessary, reflecting the opinions of local residents, along with a variety of regional characteristics.
Data Collection ; Delivery of Health Care ; Health Facilities ; Public Health* ; Rural Health ; Statistics as Topic

Banking, Personal ; COVID-19/virology* ; Environmental Microbiology ; Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data* ; Humans ; Public Facilities/statistics & numerical data* ; Public Health ; SARS-CoV-2/physiology* ; Supermarkets

OBJECTIVETo understand the underreporting on death cases through web-based reporting system from medical institutions at county level and above as well as to evaluate the quality of death cases reporting through the system.

METHODSA large-scale survey was conducted at 130 medical institutions based on stratified random sampling and to evaluate the underreporting and the quality of death cases reporting from medical institutions through data from survey and reporting system.

RESULTSIn 2005, the total reporting rates were 78.25% at the county level and 37.93% at the institutes. Comparing with the results of 2004, these rates were going down slightly. The eligibility rate of reporting was 79.62%, increased when comparing with results of 2004. The percentage of obvious coding errors among deaths reported by county level and above medical institutions was 24.68%. A total of 5226 death cases were recorded from medical (outpatient and inpatient) sources. An average underreporting rate of 33.07% was found at the selected medical institutions. Statistical difference of underreporting rate was not found at medical institutions at different levels.

CONCLUSIONSince the initiation of the web-based reporting system of death cases at medical institutes from county level and above, the timeliness of data reporting had been increasing remarkably. The system showed irreplaceable advantages. However, there still existed some problems such as the underreporting of death cases,the poor timeliness of reporting, and the poor accuracy of coding. In the meantime, it was noticed that repetitive work existed among medical institutions due to multi-systems, suggesting that it was necessary to establish a national life registration in China.

China ; epidemiology ; Death Certificates ; Forms and Records Control ; standards ; Health Facilities ; standards ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Local Government ; National Health Programs ; standards ; statistics & numerical data ; Public Health Informatics ; standards ; Quality Control