1.A Case of Orbital Abscess following Porous Orbital Implant Infection.
Seung Woo HONG ; Ji Sun PAIK ; So Youl KIM ; Suk Woo YANG
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;20(4):234-237
PURPOSE: We present a case of orbital abscess following porous orbital implant infection in a 73-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Just one month after a seemingly uncomplicated enucleation and porous polyethylene (Medpor(R)) orbital implant surgery, implant exposure developed with profuse pus discharge. The patient was unresponsive to implant removal and MRI confirmed the presence of an orbital pus pocket. Despite extirpation of the four rectus muscles, inflammatory granulation debridement and abscess drainage, another new pus pocket developed. RESULTS: After partial orbital exenteration, the wound finally healed well without any additional abscess formation. CONCLUSIONS: A patient who has risk factors for delayed wound healing must be examined thoroughly and extreme care such as exenteration must be taken if there is persistent infection.
Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis/*etiology/surgery
;
Porosity
;
Orbital Implants/*adverse effects
;
Orbital Diseases/diagnosis/*etiology/surgery
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Humans
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Female
;
Eye Enucleation
;
Device Removal
;
Aged
;
Abscess/diagnosis/*etiology/surgery
2.The second stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty using antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis.
Wei WEI ; Bo-Long KOU ; Rong-Sen JU ; Hou-Shan LÜ
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2007;45(4):246-248
OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) using antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis.
METHODSFrom June 1999 to October 2004, 14 patients who admitted for infected primary total hip arthroplasty surgeries were performed revision surgery with antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis in two-stage. The mean Harris score of pre-operation was 23. In the first stage operation, the following steps were performed, complete debridement, removal of infected prosthesis, implantation of cement spacer with antibiotics, treatment involved concomitant administration of 3 weeks of intravenous (IV) and 1 month of oral. After 6 months, antibiotic-loaded prosthesis was implanted in the second stage.
RESULTSThe mean follow-up was 18 months (7 - 26 months), no recurrent infection occurred in all 14 patients. The mean post-operation Harris score was 70.
CONCLUSIONSThe success of the protocol to control the delayed infection after THA are complete debridement, enough interval and using antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis in two stage revision.
Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; adverse effects ; Bone Cements ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis-Related Infections ; diagnosis ; etiology ; surgery ; Reoperation