Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery* ; Reoperation

Periprosthetic infection after hip replacement is a clinical catastrophic disease, which often leads to the failure of the prosthesis. It needs the combination of systemic antibiotics to cure the infection, which brings huge burden to doctors and patients. There are strict indications for debridement and one-stage revision of the prosthesis, and few cases meet the requirements. The second revision is still the gold standard for the treatment of periprosthetic infection. It is suitable for all infection conditions and has a high success rate. On the second phase of renovation, the antibiotic sustained release system plays a key role, and the carrier of antibiotic sustained-release system is the focus of current research, including classic bone cement and absorbable biomaterials. Bone cement has strong mechanical strength, but the antibiotic release shows a sharp decline trend; the absorbable biomaterials can continuously release antibiotics with high concentration, but the mechanical strength is poor, so it could not use alone. The combination of bone cement and absorbable biomaterials will be an ideal antibiotic carrier. PMMA is the most commonly used antibiotic carrier, but the antibiotic release concentration is decreased sharply after 24 hours. It will be difficult to control the infection and increase the risk of bacterial resistance if it is lower than the minimum inhibitory concentration. The biodegradable materials can release antibiotics completely, with long release time and high concentration, but low mechanical strength. Antibiotic spacer plays an important role in the control of infection. In the future, how to further extend the antibiotic release time of antibiotic sustained-release system, increase the amount of antibiotic release and maintain the mechanical strength of the material will be studied.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Bone Cements ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery* ; Reoperation

The use of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence has become more prevalent, especially in the "prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-era", when more patients are treated for localized prostate cancer. The first widely accepted device was the AMS 800, but since then, other devices have also entered the market. While efficacy has increased with improvements in technology and technique, and patient satisfaction is high, AUS implantation still has inherent risks and complications of any implant surgery, in addition to the unique challenges of urethral complications that may be associated with the cuff. Furthermore, the unique nature of the AUS, with a control pump, reservoir, balloon cuff, and connecting tubing, means that mechanical complications can also arise from these individual parts. This article aims to present and summarize the current literature on the management of complications of AUS, especially urethral atrophy. We conducted a literature search on PubMed from January 1990 to December 2018 on AUS complications and their management. We review the various potential complications and their management. AUS complications are either mechanical or nonmechanical complications. Mechanical complications usually involve malfunction of the AUS. Nonmechanical complications include infection, urethral atrophy, cuff erosion, and stricture. Challenges exist especially in the management of urethral atrophy, with both tandem implants, transcorporal cuffs, and cuff downsizing all postulated as potential remedies. Although complications from AUS implants are not common, knowledge of the management of these issues are crucial to ensure care for patients with these implants. Further studies are needed to further evaluate these techniques.
Atrophy ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications/therapy* ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy* ; Urethra/pathology* ; Urethral Diseases/therapy* ; Urethral Stricture/surgery* ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery* ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial

OBJECTIVETo determine the clinical outcomes of two-staged cementless revision arthroplasty for the treatment of deep periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty.

METHODSTwenty-three patients with deep periprosthetic infection treated with a standard protocol of two-staged cementless revision hip arthroplasty were enrolled in this study. There were 9 male patients and 14 female patients with an average age of 64 years (range, 52-78 years). In all cases, antibiotics-loaded cement spacers were implanted after removal of all the prosthetic components and thorough debridements had been done. All patients had a minimum of 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics followed by 4 weeks of oral antibiotics after implant removal. After a mean interval of 6.7 months (3-28 months), revision arthroplasties were carried out with cementless femoral components followed by 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and 4 weeks of oral antibiotics.

RESULTSThe mean follow-up period was (4.3±3.5) years. There were 2 cases of recurrent infections in this study. Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures were observed in 3 patients. One patient had dislocation of the implanted spacer during the interval period and 2 patients had hip dislocation after reimplantation. Mild subsidence of femoral component occurred in 1 patient. There were no cases of loosening of femoral components and cementless acetabular components in patients without infection recurrence. The Harris hip score increased from a preoperative mean of 36±13 to 85±13 at 12 months after reimplantation.

CONCLUSIONSUsing cementless prostheses in two-staged revisions of hip periprosthetic infections can provide low rate of infection recurrence and good implant stability, but cautions must be taken when treating patients with infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.

Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; administration & dosage ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; instrumentation ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis-Related Infections ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and optimal re-implantation time of two-stage revision for management of periprosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty.

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 15 patients (15 hip joints) undergoing two-stage ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision from January, 2006 to January, 2010. In the first stage, after surgical debridement and thorough removal of all the implants, a self-made Vancomycin-loaded cement spacer was implanted. The second stage operation was performed 3-6 months later for debridement and removal of the antibiotic-loaded spacer, followed by re-implantation of Vancomycin-loaded bone cement prosthesis in 9 cases and cementless prosthesis in 6 cases. The patients were followed up for 9-46 months (mean 25 months) after the operation.

RESULTSNo reinfection or prosthesis loosening/displacement was found in these cases after the operation. The Harris score increased from 40.3 before the operation to 54.0 after the first-stage operation, and to 88.2 at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONTwo-stage revision is effective for treatment of periprosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty, and 3-6 months can be the optimal interval between the two the first-stage and second-stage operation for re-implantation.

Adult ; Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; methods ; Female ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis-Related Infections ; surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: The screening of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with inflammatory diseases before revision arthroplasty remains uncertain. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), plasma fibrinogen (FIB), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can help screening PJI, but their values in patients with inflammatory diseases have not been determined. METHODS: Patients with inflammatory diseases who underwent revision hip or knee arthroplasty at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from January 2008 to September 2020 were divided into infected and non-infected groups based on the 2013 International Consensus Meeting criteria. Sensitivity and specificity of the tested biomarkers for diagnosing infection were determined based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and optimal cutoffs were determined based on the Youden index. The diagnostic ability of these biomarkers was re-assessed after combining them with each other. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with inflammatory diseases were studied; of them 30 were infected. The area under the ROC curve was 0.813 for CRP, 0.638 for ESR, 0.795 for FIB, and 0.656 for NLR. The optimal predictive cutoff of CRP was 14.04 mg/L with a sensitivity of 86.2% and a specificity of 68.7%, while FIB had a sensitivity of 72.4% and a specificity of 81.2% with the optimal predictive cutoff of 4.04 g/L. The combinations of CRP with FIB produced a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 78.1%. CONCLUSION: CRP with a slightly higher predictive cutoff and FIB are useful for screening PJI in patients with inflammatory diseases, and the combination of CRP and FIB may further improve the diagnostic values. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR2000039989.
Humans ; C-Reactive Protein/analysis* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis* ; Fibrinogen ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Arthritis, Infectious/surgery* ; Blood Sedimentation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Biomarkers ; Retrospective Studies

Periprosthetic gout flare is a rare arthritic condition after total knee arthroplasty, but the symptoms of gout may have often been mistaken as acute periprosthetic infection given their similarity. Misdiagnosis as periprosthetic infection can lead to unnecessary surgery, long-term dependence on anti-biotics, and even malfunction of the involved knee joint. Here, we report a case study of a patient with immunodeficiency condition of long-term oral glucocorticoid and diabetes mellitus, who had undergone a knee replacement 8 weeks before. The initial symptoms of fever and joint pain together with the dysfunction of her right knee with elevated inflammatory markers, such as increased serum leukocytes, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and synovial cell counts led to a diagnosis of acute periprosthetic infection. Arthrocentesis and bacterial culture were performed preoperatively. According to the current Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection, the case was classified as periprosthetic infection and a prosthesis retained debridement surgery was performed. However we got negative culture results in all the pre-operative and intro-operative samples. The symptoms as well as the laboratory inflammatory markers improved shortly after the debridement surgery until the 11th day when all the similar systemic and local symptoms recurred. With a remedial crystal analysis of synovial fluid from the patient, gouty flare was found to be the cause of acute arthritis finally. Accor-dingly, after anti-gout medications were administrated, the symptoms associated with acute arthritis gra- dually subsided, and there was no recurrence during a 24-month follow-up. This article described the cli-nical manifestation, diagnosis and differential diagnosis, treatment of a case of periprosthetic gout. Although relatively rare, gout should be considered as a differential diagnosis in suspected periprosthetic infection. Current criteria for periprosthetic infection can not exclude the diagnosis of periprosthetic gout flare, it is therefore imperative that the analysis of joint aspirate for crystals be conducted to determine the correct course of treatment, or unnecessary surgical procedure may be performed in periprosthetic gout case.
Humans ; Female ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Gout/complications* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery* ; Symptom Flare Up ; C-Reactive Protein/analysis* ; Biomarkers/analysis*

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) using antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis.

METHODSFrom June 1999 to October 2004, 14 patients who admitted for infected primary total hip arthroplasty surgeries were performed revision surgery with antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis in two-stage. The mean Harris score of pre-operation was 23. In the first stage operation, the following steps were performed, complete debridement, removal of infected prosthesis, implantation of cement spacer with antibiotics, treatment involved concomitant administration of 3 weeks of intravenous (IV) and 1 month of oral. After 6 months, antibiotic-loaded prosthesis was implanted in the second stage.

RESULTSThe mean follow-up was 18 months (7 - 26 months), no recurrent infection occurred in all 14 patients. The mean post-operation Harris score was 70.

CONCLUSIONSThe success of the protocol to control the delayed infection after THA are complete debridement, enough interval and using antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis in two stage revision.

Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; adverse effects ; Bone Cements ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis-Related Infections ; diagnosis ; etiology ; surgery ; Reoperation

The field of prosthetic urology demonstrates the striking impact that simple devices can have on quality of life. Penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter implantation are the cornerstone procedures on which this specialty focuses. Modern research largely concentrates on decreasing the rates of complication and infection, as the current devices offer superior rates of satisfaction when revision is not necessary. These techniques are also able to salvage sexual function and continence in more difficult patient populations including female-to-male transgender individuals, those with ischemic priapism, and those with erectile dysfunction and incontinence secondary to prostatectomy. This review summarizes modern techniques, outcomes, and complications in the field of prosthetic urology.
Erectile Dysfunction/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation/methods* ; Penile Prosthesis ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Prostatectomy/adverse effects* ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis Implantation/methods* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology* ; Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology* ; Urethra/injuries* ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery* ; Urinary Retention/epidemiology* ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial ; Urology

PURPOSE: We present a case of orbital abscess following porous orbital implant infection in a 73-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Just one month after a seemingly uncomplicated enucleation and porous polyethylene (Medpor(R)) orbital implant surgery, implant exposure developed with profuse pus discharge. The patient was unresponsive to implant removal and MRI confirmed the presence of an orbital pus pocket. Despite extirpation of the four rectus muscles, inflammatory granulation debridement and abscess drainage, another new pus pocket developed. RESULTS: After partial orbital exenteration, the wound finally healed well without any additional abscess formation. CONCLUSIONS: A patient who has risk factors for delayed wound healing must be examined thoroughly and extreme care such as exenteration must be taken if there is persistent infection.
Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis/*etiology/surgery ; Porosity ; Orbital Implants/*adverse effects ; Orbital Diseases/diagnosis/*etiology/surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Humans ; Follow-Up Studies ; Female ; Eye Enucleation ; Device Removal ; Aged ; Abscess/diagnosis/*etiology/surgery