1.A Diagnostic Significance of Transurethral and Transrectal Ultrasonography.
Korean Journal of Urology 1987;28(3):375-380
An ultrasonic scanner in the field of urology is described that can be used for transurethral as well as for transrectal scanning of the bladder and prostate. The bladder was visualized best by transurethral scanning, while the rectal approach was preferable for examination of the prostate. Transurethral ultrasonography was performed in 7 patients with bladder cancer. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed in 21 controls and 41 patients with prostatic disease. The following results were obtained: 1. Diagnostic accuracy of the staging of transurethral ultrasonography was 85.7% in bladder cancer. 2. The average values of maximum anterioposterior, superio-inferior and transverse diameter. obtained from ultrasonogram were 2.43+/-0.29cm, 3.27+/-0.41cm, 4.07+/-0.91cm in control group ;3.11+/-0.6lcm, 4.16+/-0.66 cm, 4.71+/-0.76cm in B.P.H.; 3.65+/-0.46cm, 4.88+/-0.23cm, 5.98+/-0.18cm in prostatic cancer. 3. Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography was 93% in B.P.H. and 80% in prostatic cancer. 4. Transurethral ultrasonography enabled us to determine the degree of tumor invasion of the bladder wall and was useful to help select appropriate therapy. Transrectal ultrasonography has proved especially in estimating prostatic size and in detecting pathology.
Humans
;
Pathology
;
Prostate
;
Prostatic Diseases
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
Ultrasonics
;
Ultrasonography*
;
Urinary Bladder
;
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
;
Urology
2.Prostate Volume Measurement by TRUS Using Heights Obtained by Transaxial and Midsagittal Scanning : Comparison with Specimen Volume Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Sung Bin PARK ; Jae Kyun KIM ; Sung Hoon CHOI ; Han Na NOH ; Eun Kyung JI ; Kyoung Sik CHO
Korean Journal of Radiology 2000;1(2):110-113
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine, when measuring prostate volume by TRUS, whether height is more accurately determined by transaxial or midsagittal scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients who between March 1995 and March 1998 underwent both preoperative TRUS and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer were included in this study. Using prolate ellipse volume calculation (height x length x width x pi/6), TRUS prostate volume was determined, and was compared with the measured volume of the specimen. RESULTS: Prostate volume measured by TRUS, regardless of whether height was determined transaxially or midsagittally, correlated closely with real specimen volume. When height was measured in one of these planes, a paired t test revealed no significant difference between TRUS prostate volume and real specimen volume (p = .411 and p = .740, respectively), nor were there significant differences between the findings of transaxial and midsagittal scanning (p = .570). A paired sample test, however, indicated that TRUS prostate volumes determined transaxially showed a higher correlation coefficient (0.833) and a lower standard deviation (9.04) than those determined midsagittally (0.714 and 11.48, respectively). CONCLUSION: Prostate volume measured by TRUS closely correlates with real prostate volume. Furthermore, we suggest that when measuring prostate volume in this way, height is more accurately determined by transaxial than by midsagittal scanning.
Human
;
Male
;
Middle Age
;
Prostate/*pathology/*ultrasonography
;
Prostatectomy
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology/surgery/*ultrasonography
3.Prostate Volume Measurement by TRUS Using Heights Obtained by Transaxial and Midsagittal Scanning : Comparison with Specimen Volume Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Sung Bin PARK ; Jae Kyun KIM ; Sung Hoon CHOI ; Han Na NOH ; Eun Kyung JI ; Kyoung Sik CHO
Korean Journal of Radiology 2000;1(2):110-113
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine, when measuring prostate volume by TRUS, whether height is more accurately determined by transaxial or midsagittal scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients who between March 1995 and March 1998 underwent both preoperative TRUS and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer were included in this study. Using prolate ellipse volume calculation (height x length x width x pi/6), TRUS prostate volume was determined, and was compared with the measured volume of the specimen. RESULTS: Prostate volume measured by TRUS, regardless of whether height was determined transaxially or midsagittally, correlated closely with real specimen volume. When height was measured in one of these planes, a paired t test revealed no significant difference between TRUS prostate volume and real specimen volume (p = .411 and p = .740, respectively), nor were there significant differences between the findings of transaxial and midsagittal scanning (p = .570). A paired sample test, however, indicated that TRUS prostate volumes determined transaxially showed a higher correlation coefficient (0.833) and a lower standard deviation (9.04) than those determined midsagittally (0.714 and 11.48, respectively). CONCLUSION: Prostate volume measured by TRUS closely correlates with real prostate volume. Furthermore, we suggest that when measuring prostate volume in this way, height is more accurately determined by transaxial than by midsagittal scanning.
Human
;
Male
;
Middle Age
;
Prostate/*pathology/*ultrasonography
;
Prostatectomy
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology/surgery/*ultrasonography
4.A Diagnostic Significance of Ultrasonography in Prostatic Disease.
Korean Journal of Urology 1985;26(6):609-614
From its size, location and structure, the prostate is one of the most suitable organs for the diagnostic application of ultrasound. Transrectal ultrasonography with transrectal linear array probe was per. formed in 19 controls and 36 patients with prostatic disease to evaluate the size and morphology of prostate. The following results were obtained: 1. The average values of maximum anteroposterior, superiorinferior and transverse diameter obtained from ultrasonograms were 2.2O+/-0.30cm, 3.38+/-0.35cm, 4.18+0.35cm in control group; 3.16+/-0.78 cm, 4.79+/-0.84 cm, 5.13+/-0.62cm in BPH; 3.40+/-0.84cm, 5.25+ 1.95cm, 5.73+/-1.16cm in prostatic cancer. 2. In a comparison of sonography and x-ray for detecting prostatic calculi, the detection rate of sonography (54.5 %) was higher than x-ray (25.5%). 3. Diagnostic accuracy of sonography was 88% in BPH and 100% in prostatic cancer. 4. Ultrasonographic findings in BPH were enlarged in size, homogeneity in echo pattern and all capsular echoes are continuous. In prostatic cancers, which have mixed echo pattern and capsule is thick with discontinuity. 5. Transrectal sonography is especially useful in estimating prostatic size and in detecting pathology such as BPH, prostatic cancer, prostatitis and abscess.
Abscess
;
Calculi
;
Humans
;
Pathology
;
Prostate
;
Prostatic Diseases*
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
Prostatitis
;
Ultrasonography*
5.A case of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus caused by obstructive uropathy due to prostate cancer.
Eun Gyoung HONG ; YuJin SUH ; Yoon Sok CHUNG ; Hyeon Man KIM ; Gyu Tae SHIN ; Do Young CHUNG ; Rae Woong PARK
Yonsei Medical Journal 2000;41(1):150-154
Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (DI) secondary to chronic urinary tract obstruction is a rare disease. The exact cause is unknown but it is likely that increased collecting duct pressures cause damage to the tubular epithelium, resulting in insensitivity to the action of arginine-vasopressin (AVP). A 77-year-old man complaining of polyuria and polydipsia was treated with alpha glucosidase inhibitor under the impression of polyuria due to diabetes mellitus. But his symptoms did not improve. Water deprivation and AVP administration study revealed that the patient had nephrogenic DI. Urinary tract obstruction due to an enlarged prostate was suggested as a principal cause of nephrogenic DI. The patient underwent transurethral resection of the prostate and bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy. After surgery, the urine osmolarity was normalized and the patient became symptom-free. We report a case of nephrogenic DI due to obstructive uropathy which was cured by surgery eliminating obstruction.
Adenocarcinoma/ultrasonography
;
Adenocarcinoma/radionuclide imaging
;
Adenocarcinoma/pathology
;
Adenocarcinoma/complications*
;
Aged
;
Case Report
;
Constriction, Pathologic/etiology
;
Diabetes Insipidus, Nephrogenic/etiology*
;
Human
;
Male
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/ultrasonography
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/radionuclide imaging
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/complications*
;
Urologic Diseases/etiology*
6.Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for prostate cancer: an update.
Zun-feng FU ; Xiu-fang DUAN ; Xiu-hua YANG ; Xiu-yun WANG
National Journal of Andrology 2015;21(3):272-276
The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test contributes a lot to the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) and, along with imaging-guided prostate biopsy, has improved the diagnosis rate of lower-risk PCa and the accuracy of its clinical staging. However, many questions and controversies remain as to the choice of optimal biopsy strategies. Scholars differ in views about how to utilize PCa-related biomarkers to optimize the detection of initial and repeat biopsies. This review focuses on the present status of and advances in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for PCa.
Humans
;
Image-Guided Biopsy
;
methods
;
Male
;
Prostate
;
pathology
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen
;
blood
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
pathology
;
Ultrasonography, Interventional
;
methods
7.Clinical value of ultrasound guided transperineal prostate biopsy in detecting prostate cancer.
Gui-Zhong LI ; Liu LIU ; Guang-Lin HUANG ; Tao CHEN ; Bing YAN ; Yan GAO ; Fei LUO ; Ning LIU ; Jian-Wei WANG ; Li-Bo MAN ; Feng HE ; Hai WANG
National Journal of Andrology 2005;11(11):828-831
OBJECTIVETo report our experience of ultrasound guided transperineal 6-core prostate biopsy (UG6CPB) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODSIn a prospective study, we performed UG6CPB in 104 suspected PCa patients with tPSA more than 4 microg/L and analysed the positive rate and complications of the diagnostic approach.
RESULTSPCa was detected in 24 of the 104 patients (23%), with low grade Gleason 2 to 4 in 3 cases (12.5%), intermediate grade Gleason 5 to 7 in 15 (62.5%) and high grade Gleason 8 to 10 in the remaining 6 (25%). Complications included temporary hematuria in 5 patients (4.8%), mild postbiopsy perineal discomfort in 5 (4.8%) and fever in 4 (3.8%). TPSA > or =10 microg/L, fPSA > or = 2 microg/L, fPSA/tPSA < 0.16, PSAD > or = 0.2 and prostate volume < 40 ml were the significant influencing factors of biopsy positive rate (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONUG6CPB is an exact and a safe way of detecting PCa.
Biopsy, Needle ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Perineum ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; blood ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Ultrasonography
8.Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?.
Mun Su CHUNG ; Seung Hwan LEE ; Dong Hoon LEE ; Byung Ha CHUNG
Yonsei Medical Journal 2013;54(4):902-906
PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze the relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score (GS) upgrading [higher GS category in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen than in the prostate biopsy] in Korean men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 247 men who underwent RP between May 2006 and April 2011 at our institution. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume was categorized as 25 cm3 or less (n=61), 25 to 40 cm3 (n=121) and greater than 40 cm3 (n=65). GS was examined as a categorical variable of 6 or less, 3+4 and 4+3 or greater. The relationship between TRUS volume and upgrading of GS was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 87 patients (35.2%) were upgraded, 20 (8.1%) were downgraded, and 140 (56.7%) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Smaller TRUS volume was significantly associated with increased likelihood of upgrading (p trend=0.022). Men with prostates 25 cm3 or less had more than 2.7 times the risk of disease being upgraded relative to men with TRUS volumes more than 40 cm3 (OR 2.718, 95% CI 1.403-8.126). CONCLUSION: In our study, smaller prostate volumes were at increased risk for GS upgrading after RP. This finding should be kept in mind when making treatment decisions for men with prostate cancer that appears to be of a low grade on biopsy, especially in Asian urologic fields.
Aged
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Biopsy
;
Humans
;
Logistic Models
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Grading
;
Prostate/pathology/ultrasonography
;
Prostatectomy/*methods
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/*pathology/*surgery/ultrasonography
;
Retrospective Studies
9.Comparison of the Rate of Detecting Prostate Cancer and the Pathologic Characteristics of the Patients with a Serum PSA Level in the Range of 3.0 to 4.0ng/ml and the Patients with a Serum PSA Level in the Range 4.1 to 10.0ng/ml.
Hyoung Keun PARK ; Sung Kyu HONG ; Seok Soo BYUN ; Sang Eun LEE
Korean Journal of Urology 2006;47(4):358-361
PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the prostate cancer detection rate and pathologic characteristics of patients with a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 3.0 to 4.0ng/ml and we compared this with the patients who had a PSA level in the range of 4.1 to 10.0ng/ml. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data of patients who had PSA levels of 3.0 to 10.0ng/ml, benign findings on digital rectal examination (DRE) and no specific lesion identified on transrectal ultrasound. The clinical characteristics, cancer detection rate and pathologic findings of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen were compared between the low (3.0 to 4.0ng/ml) and intermediate (4.1 to 10.0ng/ml) PSA groups. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients met our criteria and so they were included in the study. Sixty five and 305 patients had low or intermediate PSA levels, respectively. The mean age and the number of prostate biopsy cores were not different between the two groups. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 26% of the low PSA group and in 20% of the intermediate PSA group. No significant difference was found between the two groups on the pathologic findings of the biopsy and on the pathology findings of the prostatectomy specimens, including the mean Gleason score, the percentage of patients with a Gleason score 7 or higher, the pathologic stage and the percentage of insignificant prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of prostate cancer or pathological characteristics on comparison between the low and intermediate PSA groups. These results suggest that a lower PSA cutoff should be considered as an indication for a prostate biopsy in the Korean population.
Biopsy
;
Digital Rectal Examination
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Neoplasm Grading
;
Pathology
;
Prospective Studies
;
Prostate*
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen
;
Prostatectomy
;
Prostatic Neoplasms*
;
Ultrasonography
10.Preoperative Prostatic Biopsy Factors for the Prediction of Pathologic Stage after Radical Prostatectomy.
Dong Wan SOHN ; Hyoung Keun PARK ; Seok Soo BYUN ; Sang Eun LEE
Korean Journal of Urology 2005;46(7):695-699
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the preoperative prostatic biopsy values predict the tumor stage in radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the prostatic needle biopsy findings in 69 patients, diagnosed with clinical organ confined prostate cancer, and who underwent a RRP between December 2003 and November 2004. The biopsy specimens were assessed for the number and maximal tumor length of positive cores and for the Gleason score. The preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and prostate volume were measured using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). TRUS guided biopsies of 13.7 2.2 sites were performed. The preoperative values were compared with the pathological stage of the RRP specimens. RESULTS: Of the 69 patients, 53 (76.8%) had organ confined cancer and 16 (23.2%) had extraprostatic extension (pathologic T2 and T3 or greater, respectively), with mean ages of 65.6 and 65.1 years, respectively. The mean PSA levels were 8.0 and 13.0ng/ml and the prostate volumes were 38.3 and 33.8ml, respectively. The age, prostate volume, biopsy Gleason score and preoperative PSA level were not significant factors for predicting the pathological stage inform a multivariate analysis (p>0.05). The number (p=0.007) and maximal tumor length of positive cores (p=0.046) were significantly higher in those with an extraprostatic stage than in the organ confined cancer group. The optimal maximal tumor length and number of positive cores for the detection of extraprostatic cancer were 7.5mm and 6.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number and maximal tumor length of positive cores were strong predictors of the pathologic stage in the RRP specimens.
Biopsy*
;
Biopsy, Needle
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neoplasm Grading
;
Pathology
;
Prostate
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen
;
Prostatectomy*
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
Ultrasonography