1.Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module.
Jae Yoon KIM ; Seung Bin KIM ; Jong Hyun PYUN ; Hyung Keun KIM ; Seok CHO ; Jeong Gu LEE ; Je Jong KIM ; Jun CHEON ; Seok Ho KANG ; Sung Gu KANG
Korean Journal of Urology 2015;56(11):756-761
PURPOSE: We previously described a new procedure specific module (Tube 3) to allow the practice of vesicourethral anastomosis after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Herein, we report a predetermined proficiency level of Tube 3 and preliminary validation to explore whether this new module can lead to performance improvement in the da Vinci system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight urology residents and three urology fellows performed the Tube 3 module 1 hour daily for 7 days. The learning curve was depicted through a scatterplot and the stable point was identified through the cumulative sum chart. Concurrent and predictive validations were performed with the da Vinci system. The mean time to complete the task and end product rating score between Tube 3 training group and no Tube 3 training group were compared. RESULTS: Concerning the learning curve, about 41 repetitions comprising about 5 hours were needed to achieve this stable point when the mean time to complete Tube of 384 seconds was set as a target. With regarding to the concurrent and predictive validation, there significant differences were evident in the mean time to complete 16 needle passages and the vesicourethral anastomosis and the end product rating score. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual reality (VR) simulator can yield sufficient improvement in technical performance in Tube 3 within 5 hours. The acquired proficiency can be transferable to the vesicourethral anastomosis using the da Vinci system.
Anastomosis, Surgical/methods
;
Clinical Competence
;
Computer Simulation
;
Education, Medical, Graduate/*methods
;
Humans
;
Learning Curve
;
Male
;
Prostatectomy/*education/methods
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/*education/methods
;
Simulation Training/methods
;
Urethra/surgery
;
Urinary Bladder/surgery
;
User-Computer Interface
2.Current status of robotic surgery in Japan.
Korean Journal of Urology 2015;56(3):170-178
The da Vinci S surgical system (Intuitive Surgical) was approved as a medical device in 2009 by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Robotic surgery has since been used in gastrointestinal, thoracic, gynecological, and urological surgeries. In April 2012, robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) was first approved for insurance coverage. Since then, RALP has been increasingly used, with more than 3,000 RALP procedures performed by March 2013. By July 2014, 183 institutions in Japan had installed the da Vinci surgical system. Other types of robotic surgeries are not widespread because they are not covered by public health insurance. Clinical trials using robotic partial nephrectomy and robotic gastrectomy for renal and gastric cancers, respectively, have recently begun as advanced medical treatments to evaluate health insurance coverage. These procedures must be evaluated for efficacy and safety before being covered by public health insurance. Other types of robotic surgery are being evaluated in clinical studies. There are several challenges in robotic surgery, including accreditation, training, efficacy, and cost. The largest issue is the cost-benefit balance. In this review, the current situation and a prospective view of robotic surgery in Japan are discussed.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
;
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery
;
Gastrectomy/*methods
;
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods
;
Humans
;
Japan
;
Laparoscopy/*methods
;
Nephrectomy/*methods
;
Otolaryngology/methods
;
Prospective Studies
;
Prostatectomy/*methods
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/education/*trends
;
Stomach Neoplasms/surgery
;
Thymectomy/methods
;
Thyroid Diseases/surgery
3.Does robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy enable to obtain adequate oncological and functional outcomes during the learning curve? From the Korean experience.
Young Hwii KO ; Jeong Hyeon BAN ; Seok Ho KANG ; Hong Seok PARK ; Jeong Gu LEE ; Duck Ki YOON ; Je Jong KIM ; Jun CHEON ; Vipul R PATEL
Asian Journal of Andrology 2009;11(2):167-175
To estimate the short-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) during the learning curve, in terms of surgical, oncological and functional outcomes, we conducted a prospective survey on RALRP. From July 2007, a single surgeon performed 63 robotic prostatectomies using the same operative technique. Perioperative data, including pathological and early functional results of the patient, were collected prospectively and analyzed. Along with the accumulation of the cases, the total operative time, setup time, console time and blood loss were significantly decreased. No major complication was present in any patient. Transfusion was needed in six patients; all of them were within the initial 15 cases. The positive surgical margin rate was 9.8% (5/51) in pT2 disease. The most frequent location of positive margin in this stage was the lateral aspect (60%), but in pT3 disease multiple margins were the most frequent (41.7%). Overall, 53 (84.1%) patients had totally continent status and the median time to continence was 6.56 weeks. Among 17 patients who maintained preoperative sexual activity (Sexual Health Inventory for Men > or = 17), stage below pT2, followed up for > 6 months with minimally one side of neurovascular bundle preservation procedure, 12 (70.6%) were capable of intercourse postoperatively, and the mean time for sexual intercourse after operation was 5.7 months. In this series, robotic prostatectomy was a feasible and reproducible technique, with a short learning curve and low perioperative complication rate. Even during the initial phase of the learning curve, satisfactory results were obtained with regard to functional and oncological outcome.
Aged
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
methods
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
;
Postoperative Complications
;
etiology
;
Prospective Studies
;
Prostatectomy
;
adverse effects
;
education
;
methods
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
pathology
;
surgery
;
Robotics
;
Sexual Behavior
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urinary Incontinence