Prostate cancer (PCa) has become one of the common malignant diseases in elderly men, and its incidence is increasing year by year. Apart from surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, immunotherapy, as with the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) or the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, is a most promising new strategy for the treatment of PCa. PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors restore the activity of T cells by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway in tumor cells, reverse the mechanism of tumor immune escape, recover the immune system and directly kill tumor cells. This review focuses on the current progress in the studies of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of PCa.
B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Immunotherapy ; Male ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Signal Transduction

BACKGROUND: As the efficacy of programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in curing breast cancer is still controversial, this meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer, which provides guidance for the clinical treatment. METHODS: Relevant studies published as of April 2022 in the various databases including EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were selected. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which control patients underwent chemotherapy alone and experimental group patients underwent combination chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment were included in this investigation. Investigations without complete information, researches from which information could not be extracted, duplicate articles, animal studies, review articles, and systematic reviews were excluded. STATA 15.1 was employed for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: In total, eight eligible studies were identified, revealing that combination chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment was linked to significant increases in progression-free survival (PFS) relative to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.99, P = 0.032) but not overall survival (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.80-1.06, P = 0.273). Pooled adverse event rates were also increased within the group of combination treatment relative to the chemotherapy group (risk ratio [RR] = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14, P = 0.002). Specifically, nausea rates were lesser within the group of combination treatment relative to the group of chemotherapy (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.92, P = 0.026). Subgroup analyses indicated that the PFS of patients who underwent combination atezolizumab or pembrolizumab and chemotherapy treatment were substantially longer than those of patients who underwent chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.89, P ≤0.001; HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The pooled results suggest that combination chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment approaches help prolong PFS in breast cancer patients, but have no statistically significant effect on overall survival (OS). Additionally, combination therapy can significantly improve complete response rate (CRR) compared with chemotherapy alone. However, combination therapy was associated with greater rates of adverse events.
Humans ; B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy*

Immunotherapies based on immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have significantly improved patient outcomes and offered new approaches to cancer therapy over the past decade. To date, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 represent the main class of immunotherapy. Blockade of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 has shown remarkable efficacy in several specific types of cancers, however, a large subset of refractory patients presents poor responsiveness to ICB therapy; and the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Recently, numerous studies have revealed that metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells restrains immune responses by remodeling the tumor microenvironment (TME) with various products of metabolism, and combination therapies involving metabolic inhibitors and ICIs provide new approaches to cancer therapy. Nevertheless, a systematic summary is lacking regarding the manner by which different targetable metabolic pathways regulate immune checkpoints to overcome ICI resistance. Here, we demonstrate the generalized mechanism of targeting cancer metabolism at three crucial immune checkpoints (CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1) to influence ICB therapy and propose potential combined immunotherapeutic strategies co-targeting tumor metabolic pathways and immune checkpoints.
Humans ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology* ; B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology* ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; Tumor Microenvironment

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab is an checkpoint inhibitor combining with programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor on T cells, which can block the interactions between PD-1 and programmed death ligands (PD-L), including PD-L1 and PD-L2. And then block the immunosuppression mediated by the PD-1 pathway. The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of treatment-related skin toxicity caused by PD-1 inhibitor Nivolumab. METHODS: The clinical data of treatment-related skin toxicity caused by PD-1 inhibitor Nivolumab in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma admitted to the Shanghai Chest Hospital was retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the patient were discussed. RESULTS: The patient was a 60-year-old male presented with relapse after surgery and adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy for his lung carcinoma. The patient's condition still progressed after multiple chemotherapy, targeted therapy and local radiotherapy of bone metastasis. Then Nivolumab, a kind of PD-1 inhibitors, was given intravenously every 3 weeks with the average dosage 3 mg/kg. After one cycle of Nivolumab, the patient began to have skin rashes, which aggravated gradually. The patient's skin toxicity was alleviated after enough steroids and was controlled with tapering steroids slowly. Now the patient was still given oral steroids treatment. And the lung disease remained stable. CONCLUSIONS Immune-related skin toxicity associated with PD-1 inhibitor should be aware of; early detection, early treatment and the prognosis could be better. It is necessary to improve the understanding of Immune-related skin toxicity associated with PD-1 inhibitor, to diagnose and treat it early, and the prognosis could be better.
Adenocarcinoma of Lung ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nivolumab ; adverse effects ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Prognosis ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; antagonists & inhibitors ; Skin ; drug effects

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint blockades have dramatically changed the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). But we still have no definite biomarkers that may predict the efficacy of treatment by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In the 18th World Conference on Lung Cancer, the biomarkers that may predict the efficacy of treatment by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with lung cancer has been a popular topic, and it has huge potential in the future. In order to enable more patients to get more benefits from treatment, researchers are looking forward to finding the optimum biomarkers. By organizing and summarizing the information about the biomarkers predicting PD-1/PD-L1 in patients with lung cancer, this review mainly focused on the following six aspects to introduce: expression of PD-L1; tumor mutational burden and the ability of mutation repair, malignant tumor driver mutation, biomarker of immunological effect, blood cell account, comprehensive analysis model. We are hoping to help doctors to find the best biomarker, then much more lung cancer patients could obtain antitumor effects in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors treatment.
.
Antineoplastic Agents ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; B7-H1 Antigen ; antagonists & inhibitors ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; metabolism ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; genetics ; metabolism ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; genetics ; metabolism ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; antagonists & inhibitors

In recent years, research on immunotherapy has made great progress. Currently, immunotherapy has made significant breakthrough, especially programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors (e.g, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab and Avelumab, etc.) have brought clinical benefits to patients with various pathological types of lung cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer. In this paper, the application value and current status of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer were comprehensively analyzed by reviewing and interpreting representative clinical studies. Based on the results of various large-scale clinical trials results, the indications of immunotherapy in lung cancer have been continuously broadened, and the details of immunotherapy have also been constantly optimized. However, immunotherapy still faces many challenges, such as the selection of immune combination strategies, the exploration of biomarkers, the management of adverse events, the feasibility of application of driver gene mutation population and so on. In this article, we made a systematic review about the latest progress of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer, in order to provide cutting-edge reference for the clinical workers.
.
Animals ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological ; therapeutic use ; B7-H1 Antigen ; antagonists & inhibitors ; genetics ; immunology ; Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; genetics ; immunology ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; antagonists & inhibitors ; genetics ; metabolism

Antibody-based PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapies have taken center stage in immunotherapies for cancer, with multiple clinical successes. PD-1 signaling plays pivotal roles in tumor-driven T-cell dysfunction. In contrast to prior approaches to generate or boost tumor-specific T-cell responses, antibody-based PD-1/PD-L1 blockade targets tumor-induced T-cell defects and restores pre-existing T-cell function to modulate antitumor immunity. In this review, the fundamental knowledge on the expression regulations and inhibitory functions of PD-1 and the present understanding of antibody-based PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapies are briefly summarized. We then focus on the recent breakthrough work concerning the structural basis of the PD-1/PD-Ls interaction and how therapeutic antibodies, pembrolizumab targeting PD-1 and avelumab targeting PD-L1, compete with the binding of PD-1/PD-L1 to interrupt the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. We believe that this structural information will benefit the design and improvement of therapeutic antibodies targeting PD-1 signaling.
Antibodies, Monoclonal ; immunology ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; immunology ; therapeutic use ; B7-H1 Antigen ; antagonists & inhibitors ; immunology ; Humans ; Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; immunology ; pathology ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; antagonists & inhibitors ; immunology ; Signal Transduction ; drug effects ; immunology ; T-Lymphocytes ; immunology

On May 23, 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a treatment for cancer patients with positive microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) markers or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) markers. This approach is the first approved tumor treatment using a common biomarker rather than specified tumor locations in the body. FDA previously approved Keytruda for treatment of several types of malignancies, such as metastatic melanoma, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer, refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, and urothelial carcinoma, all of which carry positive programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 biomarkers. Therefore, indications of Keytruda significantly expanded. Several types of malignancies are disclosed by MSI-H status due to dMMR and characterized by increased neoantigen load, which elicits intense host immune response in tumor microenvironment, including portions of colorectal and gastric carcinomas. Currently, biomarker-based patient selection remains a challenge. Pathologists play important roles in evaluating histology and biomarker results and establishing detection methods. Taking gastric cancer as an example, its molecular classification is built on genome abnormalities, but it lacks acceptable clinical characteristics. Pathologists are expected to act as "genetic interpreters" or "genetic translators" and build a link between molecular subtypes with tumor histological features. Subsequently, by using their findings, oncologists will carry out targeted therapy based on molecular classification.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Humans ; Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Precision Medicine ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; antagonists & inhibitors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States

Objective: Total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody combined with total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer with high-risk factors. Methods: A descriptive cohort study was conducted. Clinicopathological data of 24 patients with locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer with high-risk factors receiving PD-1 antibody combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Unit III, Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 2019 and April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria: (1) rectal adenocarcinoma confirmed by pathology; patient age of ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years; (2) the distance from low margin of tumor to anal verge ≤ 10 cm under sigmoidoscopy; (3) ECOG performance status score 0-1; (4) clinical stage T3c, T3d, T4a or T4b, or extramural venous invasion (EMVI) (+) or mrN2 (+) or mesorectal fasciae (MRF) (+) based on MRI; (5) no evidence of distant metastases; (6) no prior pelvic radiation therapy, no prior chemotherapy or surgery for rectal cancer; (7) no systemic infection requiring antibiotic treatment and no immune system disease. Exclusion criteria: (1) anticipated unresectable tumor after neoadjuvant treatment; (2) patients with a history of a prior malignancy within the past 5 years, or with a history of any arterial thrombotic event within the past 6 months; (3) patients received other types of antitumor or experimental therapy; (4) women who were pregnant or breast-feeding; (5) patients with any other concurrent medical or psychiatric condition or disease; (6) patients received immunotherapy (PD-1 antibody). The neoadjuvant therapy consisted of three stages: PD-1 antibody (sintilimab 200 mg, IV, Q3W) combined with CapeOx regimen for three cycles; long-course intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with gross tumor volume (GTV) 50.6 Gy/CTV 41.8 Gy/22f; CapeOx regimen for two cycles after radiotherapy. After oncological evaluation following the end of the third stage of treatment, surgery or watch and wait would be carried out. Surgical safety, histopathological changes and short-term oncological outcome were analyzed. Results: There were 15 males and 9 females with a median age of 65 (47-78) years. Median distance from the lower margin of the tumor to the anal verge was 4 (3-7) cm. The median maximal diameter of the tumor was 5.1 (2.1-7.5) cm. Twenty patients were cT3, 4 were cT4, 8 were cN1, 5 were cN2a, 11 were cN2b. Ten cases were MRF (+) and 10 were EMVI (+). All the patients were mismatch repair proficient (pMMR). During the neoadjuvant treatment period, 6 patients (25.0%) developed grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events, including 3 immune-related adverse events. As of April 30, 2021, 20 patients (83.3%, 20/24) had received surgical resection, including 19 R0 resections and 16 sphincter-preservation operations. Morbidity of postoperative complication was 25.0% (5/20), including 2 cases of Clavien-Dindo grade II (1 of anastomotic bleeding and 1 of pseudomembranous enteritis), 3 cases of grade I anastomotic stenosis. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 30.0% (6/20) and major pathological response rate was 20.0% (4/20). None of Ras/Raf mutants had pCR or cCR (0/5), while 6 of 17 Ras/Raf wild-type patients had pCR and 3 had cCR, which was significantly higher than that of Ras/Raf mutants (P<0.01). Nine of 16 patients with Ras/Raf wild-type and differentiated adenocarcinoma had pCR or cCR. Among other 4 patients without surgery, 3 patients preferred watch and wait strategy because their tumors were assessed as clinical complete response (cCR), while another one patient refused surgery as the tumor remained stable. After a median follow-up of 11 (6-24) months, only 1 patient with signet ring cell carcinoma had recurrence. Conclusions: PD-1 antibody combined with total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer has quite good safety and histopathological regression results. Combination of histology and genetic testing is helpful to screen potential beneficiaries.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Apoptosis ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Rectal Neoplasms/therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome

Despite impressive survival benefits with immunotherapy in patients with various solid tumors, the full potential of these agents in prostate cancer has yet to be realized. Sipuleucel-T demonstrated a survival benefit in this population, indicating that prostate cancer is an immunoresponsive disease; however, these results have not been matched by other agents. A large trial with ipilimumab in prostate cancer failed to meet its primary objective, and small trials with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not yield a significant improvement in overall response. However, several late-stage clinical trials are underway with other vaccines in prostate cancer. Reports of clinical benefit with immunotherapies, particularly when used in combination or a select population, have provided the framework to develop sound clinical trials. Understanding immunogenic modulation, antigen spread, biomarkers, and DNA-repair defects will also help mold future strategies. Through rational patient selection and evidence-based combination approaches, patients with prostate cancer may soon derive durable survival benefits with immunotherapies.
Animals ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Benzamides ; CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Ipilimumab/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Nitriles ; Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives* ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Tissue Extracts/administration & dosage*