1.Gene editing for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency disease.
Shan LIU ; Shu-Yu FANG ; Yun-Fei AN
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2021;23(7):743-748
Gene editing is an advanced technique based on artificial nucleases and can precisely modify genome sequences. It has shown great application prospects in the field of medicine and has provided a new precision therapy for diseases. Primary immunodeficiency disease is a group of diseases caused by single gene mutation and characterized by recurrent and refractory infections, with an extremely high mortality rate. The application of gene editing has brought hope for curing these diseases. This article reviews the development of gene editing technology and briefly introduces the research and application of gene editing technology in primary immunodeficiency disease.
Gene Editing
;
Humans
;
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
2.Progress on the diagnosis and therapy about atopic diseases and primary immunodeficiency diseases.
Zhou Xian PAN ; Ying Yang XU ; Sai Nan BIAN ; Ji LI ; Yu Lin JIANG ; Ji LI ; Kai GUAN
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2022;56(9):1218-1225
Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) is a congenital disease caused by single gene germline mutation related to the immune system. PID patients have immune dysregulation, and are susceptible to infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, autoimmune diseases, allergic diseases, and malignant tumors. The first symptom of some PID patients is atopic disease, therefore they go to the department of allergy, department of pediatrics and other relevant departments. How to identify and diagnose PID in allergic patients, to reduce diagnosis delay and prevent disease aggravation are the abilities that allergists, pediatricians, and doctors in other relevant departments need to master. This article summarizes the warning signs of PID in allergic patients and the mechanism of allergy combined with PID, and then summarizes the common types of PID in allergic patients, the evaluation, treatment and prevention in patients with PID and allergy.
Autoimmune Diseases
;
Child
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity/therapy*
;
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/therapy*
;
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/therapy*
3.Several Common Respiratory Viral Pathogens in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantion Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Disease.
Yu HUANG ; Zhi CHEN ; Yan MENG ; Xian-Min GUAN ; Jie YU ; Xiao-Dong ZHAO ; Ying DOU
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2020;28(3):1025-1031
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the prevalence of respiratory viral infections in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PID) during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
METHODS:
108 specimens of nasopharyngeal aspirate were collected from 22 PID patients before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from July 2016 to July 2018 in the Department of Hematology. The TR-PCR was used to detect for respiratory viruses including respiratory syncytial virus(RSV),human metapneumoviros(hMPV),coronavirus(CoV) and parainfluenza 1-3 (PIV1-3). And the clinical characteristics and co-infection were analyzed.
RESULTS:
Among the total 108 specimens, viral pathogens were identified in 41 (37.96%) specimens. Among which the pathogens of highest detection rate was RSV (25.9%). Different types of PID showed different virus infection rates, among which the highest infection rate was severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID) patients, with the virus detection rate was 57.9%. The incidence of co-infection with two or more than two viruses was 19.5%.
CONCLUSION
Patients with PID who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are more susceptible to respiratory viruses. RSV is an important respiratory tract virus pathogen after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
;
Hematopoietic Stem Cells
;
Humans
;
Metapneumovirus
;
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
;
therapy
;
Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human
;
Respiratory Tract Infections
4.Analysis of risk factors and prognosis of cytomegalovirus infection post umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation in children with primary immunodeficiency diseases.
Zhong Ling WEI ; Xiao Wen QIAN ; Ping WANG ; Wen Jin JIANG ; Hong Sheng WANG ; Chen SHEN ; Wen Jie WANG ; Jia HOU ; Yu Huan WANG ; Ying HUANG ; Xiao Chuan WANG ; Xiao Wen ZHAI
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics 2022;60(10):1019-1025
Objective: To investigate the risk factors and outcomes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection post umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation (UCBT) in children with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID). Methods: Clinical data of 143 PID children who received UCBT in the Children's Hospital of Fudan University from January 2015 to June 2020 were collected retrospectively. CMV-DNA in the plasma was surveilled once or twice a week within 100 days post-UCBT. According to the CMV-DNA test results, children were divided into the CMV-infected group and the CMV-uninfected group. The incidence and risk factors of CMV infection were analyzed. At 1-month post-UCBT, the absolute lymphocyte count, ratio of lymphocyte subsets and immunoglobulin levels were compared between those whose CMV infection developed 1-month later post-UCBT and those not. Mann-Whitney U test and chi-squared test were used for comparision between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to analyze the impact of CMV infection on survival. Results: Among 143 patients, there were 113 males and 30 females, with a age of 14 (8, 27) months at UCBT. Chronic granulomatosis disease (n=49), very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (n=43) and severe combined immunodefiency (n=29) were the three main kinds of PID. The rate of CMV infection was 21.7% (31/143), and the time of infection occurring was 44 (31, 49) days post-UCBT. The incidence of recurrent CMV infection was 4.2% (6/143) and refractory CMV infection was 4.9% (7/143).There was no significant difference in the first time CMV-DNA copy and peak CMV-DNA copy during treatment between the recurrent CMV infection group and the non-recurrent CMV infection group (32.8 (18.3, 63.1)×106 vs. 22.5 (13.2, 31.9)×106 copies/L, Z=-0.95, P=0.340;35.2 (20.2, 54.6)×106 vs. 28.4 (24.1, 53.5)×106copies/L, Z=-0.10, P=0.920), so were those between the refractory CMV infection group and non-refractory CMV infection group (21.8 (13.1, 32.2)×106 vs. 25.9 (14.2, 12.2)×106copies/L, Z=-1.04, P=0.299; 47.7 (27.9, 77.6)×106 vs. 27.7 (19.7,51.8)×106copies/L, Z=-1.49, P =0.137). The CMV-infected group accepted more reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen than the CMV-uninfected group (45.2% (14/31) vs. 25.0% (28/112), χ2=4.76, P<0.05). The rate of CMV-seropositive recipients and Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute graft versus host diseases (aGVHD) are significantly higher in the CMV-infected group than the CMV-uninfected group (100% (31/31) vs. 78.6% (88/112), 64.5% (20/31) vs. 26.8% (30/112), χ2=7.98,15.20, both P<0.05). The follow-up time was 31.6 (13.2, 45.9) months, CMV infection had no effect on overall survival (OS) rate (χ2=0.02, P=0.843). There was significant difference in the survival rate among three groups of refractory CMV infection, non-refractory CMV infection and the CMV-uninfected (4/7 vs.95.8% (23/24) vs. 86.6% (97/112), χ2=5.91, P=0.037), while there was no significant difference in the survival rate among three groups of recurrent CMV infection, non-recurrent CMV infection and the CMV-uninfected (5/6 vs. 88.0% (22/25) vs. 86.6% (97/112), χ2=0.43, P=0.896). Children who developed CMV infection after 30 days post-UCBT had lower absolute count and rate of CD4+ T cells and immunoglobulin G (IgG) level than those in the CMV-uninfected group (124.1 (81.5, 167.6) ×106 vs. 175.5 (108.3, 257.2) ×106/L, 0.240 (0.164, 0.404) vs. 0.376 (0.222, 0.469), 9.3 (6.2, 14.7) vs. 13.6 (10.7, 16.4) g/L, Z=-2.48, -2.12,-2.47, all P<0.05), but have higher rate of CD8+T cells than those in CMV-uninfected group (0.418 (0.281, 0.624) vs. 0.249 (0.154, 0.434), Z=-2.56, P=0.010). Conclusions: RIC regimen, grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD and CMV-seropositive recipients are the main risk factors associated with CMV infection in PID patients post-UCBT. Survival rate of children with refractory CMV infection after UCBT is reduced. Immune reconstitution in children after UCBT should be regularly monitored, and frequency of CMV-DNA monitoring should be increased for children with delayed immune reconstitution.
Child
;
Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects*
;
Cytomegalovirus
;
Cytomegalovirus Infections/etiology*
;
DNA
;
Female
;
Graft vs Host Disease/etiology*
;
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects*
;
Humans
;
Immunoglobulin G
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors