PURPOSE: This study was done to compare clinical nurses' knowledge and visual differentiation diagnostic ability for the pressure ulcer classification system (PUCS) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). METHODS: A convenience sample of 602 nurses took the pressure ulcer classification system and incontinence-associated dermatitis knowledge test (PUCS & IAD KT) and completed the visual differentiation tool (VDT), consisting of 21 photographs with clinical information. RESULTS: The overall mean score for correct answers was 14.5 (+/-3.2) in PUCS & IAD KT and 11.15 (+/-4.9) in PUCS & IAD VDT. Incorrect responses were most common for statements related to stage III, IAD for PUCS & IAD KT, and suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI), unstageable, and stage III for PUCS & IAD VDT. Significant correlations were found between PUCS & IAD KT and VDT (r=.48, p<.001). Factors affecting scores for PUCS & IAD VDT were PUCS & IAD KT, frequency of pressure ulcer, IAD management and participation in wound care education programs. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that nurses have an overall understanding of PUCS & IAD, but low visual differentiation ability regarding stage III, SDTI, and unstageable ulcers. Continuing education is needed to further improve knowledge and visual differentiation ability for PUCS & IAD.
Adult ; Dermatitis/*classification/complications/pathology ; Education, Continuing ; Educational Measurement ; Fecal Incontinence/complications ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Male ; Nurses/*psychology ; Pressure Ulcer/*classification/pathology ; Questionnaires ; Urinary Incontinence/complications

PURPOSE: We designed this study to evaluate the incidence of spinal cord injury and the results of surgical treatment of lower cervical spine injury, and to suggest a rational treatment guideline according to the stages of Allen's mechanistic classification of the lower cervical spine injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and roentgenograms of 66 patients (49 men and 17 women), who were treated surgically for acute fracture and dislocation of the lower cervical spine since March. 1991 to March. 1996. These patients ranged in age from 17 to 68 years (average age- 38 years). We used Allen's mechanistic classification to analyze fractures in the lower cervical spine injury. We divided neurologic status by complete, incomplete, root injury and no neurologic deficit group, Surgical treatment was performed for those with unstable fracture/dislocation, progressive neurologic deficit with conservative care, neurologic deficit with spinal cord compression by fracture fragment or extruded disc material. Surgical approach was determined according to the site of lesion. We analyzed the surgical treatment results according to neurologic recovery, radiologic bone union and complications, We used chisquare test for statistical analysis of neurologic improvement between the different surgical treatments. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cases were distractive-flexion (DF) phylogeny, 19 cases were compressive-flexion (CF), 2 cases were vertical-compression (VC), 8 cases were compressive-extension (CE), and 8 cases were distractive-extension (DE) phylogeny. For definitive surgical treatments we performed anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in 25, ACDF with anterior stabilizaiton in 30, posterior fusion in 5, and circumferential fusion in 6. There was no neurologic recovery in complete cord injury. There were 32 cases of incomplete cord injury all 8 anterior cord syndromes had no neurologic recovery, among 22 patients with central cord syndrome 18 had neurolgic recovery in various degrees and 2 with Brown-Seguard syndrome showed significant neurologic recovery. In nerve root injury, all patients had complete neurologic recovery. There was no radiologic nonunion at all and it took 10.3 weeks in average for radiologic bone union. There were neurogenic bladder, bed sore, local kyphosis, duodenal ulcer, respiratory infection, persistent neck pain and superficial wound infection in complications. Summary and CONCLUSIONS: In extension (CE, DE) injuries with neurologic deficit, anterior approach should be recommended because the major pathology is located in the anterior structure of the cervical spine. In flexion (DF and CF) injuries with major posterior osteoligamentous disruption, posterior approach could fix the posterior structures. Anterior decompression and fusion should be followed whenever anterior pathology is compressing the spinal cord or nerve root. Posterior open reduction and fusion is necessary whenever there is unreduced facet joint dislocation with or with out neurologic deficit. To prevent the late local kyphosis and persistent neurologic deficit with neck pain after prolonged external immobilization with ACDF, anterior stabilization with a plate and screw system is necessary to augment the surgical treatment of the unstable lower cervical spine injury which necessitates anterior decompression.
Central Cord Syndrome ; Classification ; Decompression ; Diskectomy ; Dislocations ; Duodenal Ulcer ; Humans ; Immobilization ; Incidence ; Kyphosis ; Male ; Medical Records ; Neck Pain ; Neurologic Manifestations ; Pathology ; Phylogeny ; Pressure Ulcer ; Spinal Cord ; Spinal Cord Compression ; Spinal Cord Injuries ; Spine* ; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic ; Wound Infection ; Zygapophyseal Joint