1.Adding MYC/BCL2 double expression to NCCN‑IPI may not improve prognostic value to an acceptable level
Naree WARNNISSORN ; Nonglak KANITSAP ; Pimjai NIPARUCK ; Paisarn BOONSAKAN ; Prapasri KULALERT ; Wasithep LIMVORAPITAK ; Lantarima BHOOPAT ; Supawee SAENGBOON ; Chinnawut SURIYONPLENGSAENG ; Pichika CHANTRATHAMMACHART ; Teeraya PUAVILAI ; Suporn CHUNCHARUNEE
Blood Research 2024;59():2-
Background:
MYC/BCL2 double expression (DE) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP).This study aimed to determine whether the addition of DE to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Internal Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) could improve the prediction of disease progression in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP.
Methods:
This confirmatory prognostic factor study retrospectively recruited patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2018, at Ramathibodi Hospital (RA) and Thammasat University Hospital (TU).The follow-up period ended on July 1, 2022. Tumors expressing MYC ≥ 40% and BCL2 ≥ 50% were classified as DE. We calculated the hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) from the date of diagnosis to refractory disease, relapse, or death. Discrimination of the 5-year prediction was based on Cox models using Harrell’s concordance index (c-index).
Results:
A total of 111 patients had DE (39%), NCCN-IPI (8%), and disease progression (46%). The NCCN-IPI adjusted HR of DE was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9–2.8; P = 0.117). The baseline NCCN-IPI c-index was 0.63. Adding DE to the NCCN-IPI slightly increased Harrell’s concordance index (c-index) to 0.66 (P = 0.119).
Conclusions
Adding DE to the NCCN-IPI may not improve the prognostic value to an acceptable level in resourcelimited settings. Multiple independent confirmatory studies from a large cohort of lymphoma registries have provided additional evidence for the clinical utility of DE.
2.Inhibitory effect of Phlai capsules on skin test responses among allergic rhinitis patients: a randomized, three-way crossover study.
Pattara TANTICHAROENWIWAT ; Prapasri KULALERT ; ; Sittichai KOONTONGKAEW ; Weena JIRATCHARIYAKUL ; Ruedee SOAWAKONTHA ; Prakongsiri BOONCONG ; Orapan POACHANUKOON
Journal of Integrative Medicine 2017;15(6):462-468
BACKGROUNDZingiber cassumunar Roxb., commonly known as Phlai in Thai, has been used as a traditional medicine in Thailand for the treatment of various diseases, including inflammation and chronic airway disease.
OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to assess the antihistaminic effect of Phlai on skin testing.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONThis was a randomized, open-label, three-way crossover study. Twenty allergic rhinitis (AR) patients were enrolled. In randomized sequence, patients received a single dose of Phlai capsules (100 or 200 mg) or loratadine (10 mg) with a washout period of 1 week between each treatment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESSkin prick testing for histamine and common aeroallergen (house dust mite) were performed before treatment and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours of treatment. The main treatment outcomes were the mean wheal and flare responses to the skin prick test after treatment.
RESULTSBoth 100 mg and 200 mg Phlai doses suppressed wheal and flare responses to house dust mite allergen, but only 200 mg of Phlai capsules significantly suppressed wheal and flare responses to histamine. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that loratadine caused more wheal and flare suppression than Phlai capsules in responses to the histamine skin prick test. However, there were no significant differences among the effects of 100 mg Phlai capsules, 200 mg Phlai capsules and loratadine in suppression of wheal and flare induced by the mite skin prick test. Both doses of Phlai were well-tolerated with no adverse events.
CONCLUSIONBoth 100 mg (compound D 4 mg) and 200 mg (compound D 8 mg) Phlai capsules, when taken as a single therapeutic dose, inhibited skin reactivity to histamine and mite skin prick tests in AR patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATIONThai clinical trial registry (TCTR20160510001).