OBJECTIVE: Downward occupational drift has been extensively investigated in schizophrenia. It is known that certain illness related factors, such as severity, affect drift, but the impact of familial factors has not been investigated. METHODS: Occupation drift was studied among patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (SZ/SZA)(n=523) and 130 affected sib pairs (ASPs). Drift was analyzed in relation to familiality as well as demographic and clinical variables. For comparison one proband (one of the affected siblings) from each ASP was selected. Occupation drift was measured in relation to the most responsible job held, and with regard to head of the household (HOH) occupation status. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between single affected and ASP probands in terms of occupational drift from the most responsible job (drifted 39.2% and 38% respectively) and with regard to HOH's occupation (drifted 88% and 82.8% respectively). A significant part of the sample remained unemployed in both single affected and ASP samples. Thus, there was no significant impact of familiality on these variables. However, marital status, pattern of severity, age at onset, gender were found to be associated with downward occupation drift in single affected probands while the only significant factor in familial probands was pattern of severity of severity when measuring in terms of downward drift from most responsible job. CONCLUSION: Though there is occupation drift in schizophrenia, there is no detectable impact of familial factors. Employment is associated with severity of delete.
Employment ; Family Characteristics ; Head ; Humans ; Marital Status ; Occupations* ; Schizophrenia* ; Unemployment ; Viperidae

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that similar differences in psychopathology are present across cultures among men and women with schizophrenia (SZ). METHODS: Sex based differences were tested systematically in two independent samples from the Northeastern USA and North India using the same procedures. The clinical variables were obtained from five interview instruments. RESULTS: Among the US participants, the number of significant differences exceeded chance predictions (15/240 variables significant at p<0.02, 6.25%; expected number of significant differences: 5). Similarly, a greater than expected number of variables differed significantly between men and women among the Indian subjects (13/230 differences at p<0.02, 5.65%; expected: 5). One of these variables significantly differed in both samples (lifetime abuse of cannabis). When multivariate analyses were conducted in the combined US and Indian samples sex based differences remained for only four variables: course of the illness, history of inappropriate emotions, marital status and number of children. CONCLUSION: Sex based differences in SZ/schizoaffective disorder are present in the USA and India at greater than chance probabilities. The majority of the variables differ across the samples. The biological underpinnings of these variables need further investigation.
Female ; Humans ; India ; Male ; Marital Status ; Multivariate Analysis ; Psychopathology ; Schizophrenia