1.Incidence and Management of Bleeding Complications Following Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy.
Nieun SEO ; Ji Hoon SHIN ; Gi Young KO ; Hyun Ki YOON ; Dong Il GWON ; Jin Hyoung KIM ; Kyu Bo SUNG
Korean Journal of Radiology 2012;13(2):174-181
OBJECTIVE: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a serious complication that sometimes occurs after percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG). We evaluated the incidence of bleeding complications after a PRG and its management including transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 574 patients who underwent PRG in our institution between 2000 and 2010. Eight patients (1.4%) had symptoms or signs of upper GI bleeding after PRG. RESULTS: The initial presentation was hematemesis (n = 3), melena (n = 2), hematochezia (n = 2) and bloody drainage through the gastrostomy tube (n = 1). The time interval between PRG placement and detection of bleeding ranged from immediately after to 3 days later (mean: 28 hours). The mean decrease in hemoglobin concentration was 3.69 g/dL (range, 0.9 to 6.8 g/dL). In three patients, bleeding was controlled by transfusion (n = 2) or compression of the gastrostomy site (n = 1). The remaining five patients underwent an angiography because bleeding could not be controlled by transfusion only. In one patient, the bleeding focus was not evident on angiography or endoscopy, and wedge resection including the tube insertion site was performed for hemostasis. The other four patients underwent prophylactic (n = 1) or therapeutic (n = 3) TAEs. In three patients, successful hemostasis was achieved by TAE, whereas the remaining one patient underwent exploration due to persistent bleeding despite TAE. CONCLUSION: We observed an incidence of upper GI bleeding complicating the PRG of 1.4%. TAE following conservative management appears to be safe and effective for hemostasis.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Embolization, Therapeutic/*methods
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis/*epidemiology/*therapy
;
*Gastrostomy
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Postoperative Hemorrhage/diagnosis/*epidemiology/*therapy
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Evaluation of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS Scores for Predicting Long-term Out-of-Hospital Bleeding after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
Xue-Yan ZHAO ; Jian-Xin LI ; Xiao-Fang TANG ; Ying XIAN ; Jing-Jing XU ; Ying SONG ; Lin JIANG ; Lian-Jun XU ; Jue CHEN ; Yin ZHANG ; Lei SONG ; Li-Jian GAO ; Zhan GAO ; Jun ZHANG ; Yuan WU ; Shu-Bin QIAO ; Yue-Jin YANG ; Run-Lin GAO ; Bo XU ; Jin-Qing YUAN
Chinese Medical Journal 2018;131(3):262-267
BACKGROUND:
There is scanty evidence concerning the ability of Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy and Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ACUITY-HORIZONS) scores to predict out-of-hospital bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to assess and compare the long-term prognostic value of these scores regarding out-of-hospital bleeding risk in such patients.
METHODS:
We performed a prospective observational study of 10,724 patients undergoing PCI between January and December 2013 in Fuwai Hospital, China. All patients were followed up for 2 years and evaluated through the Fuwai Hospital Follow-up Center. Major bleeding was defined as Types 2, 3, and 5 according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Definition criteria.
RESULTS:
During a 2-year follow-up, 245 of 9782 patients (2.5%) had major bleeding (MB). CRUSADE (21.00 [12.00, 29.75] vs. 18.00 [11.00, 26.00], P < 0.001) and ACUITY-HORIZONS (9.00 [3.00, 14.00] vs. 6.00 [3.00, 12.00], P < 0.001) risk scores were both significantly higher in the MB than non-MB groups. Both scores showed a moderate predictive value for MB in the whole study cohort (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve [AUROC], 0.565; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.529-0.601, P = 0.001; AUROC, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.529-0.603, P < 0.001, respectively) and in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subgroup (AUROC: 0.579, 95% CI: 0.531-0.627, P = 0.001; AUROC, 0.591; 95% CI, 0.544-0.638, P < 0.001, respectively). However, neither score was a significant predictor in the non-ACS subgroup (P > 0.05). The value of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in the whole cohort, ACS subgroup, or non-ACS subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS
CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores showed statistically significant but relatively limited long-term prognostic value for out-of-hospital MB after PCI with DES in a cohort of Chinese patients. The value of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in the whole cohort, ACS subgroup, or non-ACS subgroup.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
;
therapy
;
Aged
;
Angina, Unstable
;
therapy
;
Drug-Eluting Stents
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Myocardial Infarction
;
therapy
;
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
;
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
;
adverse effects
;
Postoperative Hemorrhage
;
chemically induced
;
diagnosis
;
epidemiology
;
surgery
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic
;
Prognosis
;
Prospective Studies
;
Research Design
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
Treatment Outcome