Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are widely used in the management of bleeding gastric varices (GV). More recently, several studies have demonstrated balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) as an effective treatment method for bleeding isolated GV, especially in patients with contraindications for a TIPS placement. Both TIPS and BRTO can effectively treat bleeding GV with low rebleeding rates. Careful patient selection for TIPS and BRTO procedures is required to best treat the patient's individual clinical situation.
Balloon Occlusion ; Embolization, Therapeutic ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices* ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Methods ; Patient Selection ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical* ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic

Summary of Event: A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stent (Viatorr) was misplaced into main portal vein and superior mesenteric vein. This misplaced covered stent was then successfully retrieved using the rigid endobronchial forceps. Teaching Point: Before release the covered portion of the TIPS stent (Viatorr), it is necessary to confirm the position of uncovered portion in portal vein and covered portion in parenchymal tract. The endobronchial forceps technique is a safe and efficient method for retrieving a misplaced TIPS stent.
Device Removal ; Mesenteric Veins ; Methods ; Portal Vein ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical* ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; Stents* ; Surgical Instruments*

No abstract available.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/*surgery ; Electroporation/*methods ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/*surgery ; Male ; *Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; *Stents

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; etiology ; surgery ; Liver Cirrhosis ; complications ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; methods

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, efficacy and long-term patency of parallel shunts (PS) in the management of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2007 and October 2010, 18 patients (13 men and 5 women) who underwent TIPS revision with the creation of PS were evaluated retrospectively. In the first 10 patients, a 10-mm-diameter Wallgraft endoprosthesis was deployed; in the latter 8 patients, an 8-mm-diameter Fluency endoprosthesis was deployed. RESULTS: The creation of PS was technically successful in all patients. The mean +/- standard deviation portosystemic pressure gradient before and after the procedure was 25.5 +/- 7.3 mm Hg (range, 16-37 mm Hg) and 10.9 +/- 2.3 mm Hg (range, 7-16 mm Hg), respectively. The duration of follow-up was 16.7 +/- 10.8 months (range, 6-42 months). The primary shunt patency rates at 12 months after the creation of PS was 70% with Wallgraft endoprostheses and 87.5% with Fluency endoprostheses. CONCLUSION: TIPS revision with the creation of PS is a safe, effective and durable method for treating shunt dysfunction.
Adult ; Aged ; Blood Pressure Determination ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polytetrafluoroethylene ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/adverse effects/*methods ; Prosthesis Design ; Reoperation/methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents

OBJECTIVETo determine the outcome of hepatic venousaplasty and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of the Budd-Chiari syndrome with occlusion of the hepatic veins.

METHODSFifty patients of the Budd-Chiari syndrome with occlusion of the hepatic veins (23 males and 27 females, with a mean age of (39 ± 11) years) were elected for venousaplasty or TIPS. The average of Child-Pugh scores was 9.6 ± 2.6. Three patients had a acute course of the disease, while 47 patients had a subacute or a chronic course of the disease. The clinical presentation was ascites in all 50 cases, with concomitant upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 10 patients, hepatorenal syndrome in 4 patients and impaired liver function in all patients. Hepatic venousplasty was performed for 12 patients with occlusion of hepatic venous. Hepatic and inferior caval venousplasty were performed for 6 patients with occlusion of hepatic and inferior caval vein. TIPS was performed for 13 patients with occlusion of small hepatic vein. Modified TIPS was performed for 19 patients with extensive occlusion of hepatic vein.

RESULTSThe procedure of treatment was successfully performed in all patients. The shunt reduced the portosystemic pressure gradient from (41 ± 10) to (27 ± 6) cmH2O (1 cmH2O = 0.098 kPa, t = 20.20, P = 0.001) and improved the portal flow velocity from (14 ± 10) to (52 ± 14) cm/s (t = 15.02, P = 0.001) after TIPS or modified TIPS. Clinical symptoms and the biochemical test results improved significantly during 3 weeks after hepatic venousplasty and shunt treatment. During the hospitalization, the death occurred in 1 case due to hepatic failure and the acute occlusion of shunt was treated with secondary intervention in another case. The mean follow-up was (82 ± 46) months. The revisions of shunt with TIPS were needed in 2 patients and the inflation of stenosised hepatic vein in another 2 patients during the follow-up. All patients were still observed.

CONCLUSIONHepatic venousaplasty and TIPS provide an excellent outcome in patients of Budd-Chiari syndrome with occlusion of the hepatic veins.

Adult ; Angioplasty ; Budd-Chiari Syndrome ; surgery ; Female ; Hepatic Veins ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

We report in a 65-year-old man hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stent-graft which was successfully treated with irreversible electroporation (IRE). IRE is a new non-thermal tissue ablation technique which uses electrical pulses to induce cell necrosis by irreversible membrane poration. IRE proved to be more advantageous in the ablation of perivascular tumor with little injury to the surrounding structures.
Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis/*surgery ; Electroporation/*methods ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis/*surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; *Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; *Stents ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonography, Doppler

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of transmesenteric vein extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TEPS) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV). Methods: The clinical data of CTPV patients with patency or partial patency of the superior mesenteric vein treated with TIPS or TEPS treatment in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Henan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected. The differences in baseline data, surgical success rate, complication rate, incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy, and other related indicators between TIPS and TEPS group were statistically analyzed by independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to calculate the cumulative patency rate of the shunt and the recurrence rate of postoperative portal hypertension symptoms in both groups. Results: The surgical success rate (100% vs. 65.52%), surgical complication rate (6.67% vs. 36.84%), cumulative shunt patency rate (100% vs. 70.70%), and cumulative symptom recurrence rate (0% vs. 25.71%) of the TEPS group and TIPS group were statistically significantly different (P < 0.05). The time of establishing the shunt [28 (2141) min vs. 82 (51206) min], the number of stents used [1 (12) vs. 2 (15)], and the length of the shunt [10 (912) cm vs. 16 (1220) cm] were statistically significant between the two groups (t = -3.764, -4.059, -1.765, P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative hepatic encephalopathy in the TEPS group and TIPS group was 6.67% and 15.79% respectively, with no statistically significant difference (Fisher's exact probability method, P = 0.613). The pressure of superior mesenteric vein decreased from (29.33 ± 1.99) mmHg to (14.60 ± 2.80) mmHg in the TEPS group and from (29.68 ± 2.31) mmHg to (15.79 ± 3.01) mmHg in TIPS group after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 16.625, 15.959, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The best indication of TEPS is in CTPV patients with patency or partial patency of the superior mesenteric vein. TEPS improves the accuracy and success rate of surgery and reduces the incidence of complications.
Humans ; Portal Vein/surgery* ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/methods* ; Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology* ; Treatment Outcome ; Hypertension, Portal/complications* ; Retrospective Studies ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology*

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of transcaval transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with occluded previous TIPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 1996 and December 2000 we performed five transcaval TIPS procedures in four patients with recurrent gastric cardiac variceal bleeding. All four had occluded TIPS, which was between the hepatic and portal vein. The interval between initial TIPS placement and revisional procedures with transcaval TIPS varied between three and 31 months; one patient underwent transcaval TIPS twice, with a 31-month interval. After revision of the occluded shunt failed, direct cavoportal puncture at the retrohepatic segment of the IVC was attempted. RESULTS: Transcaval TIPS placement was technically successful in all cases. In three, tractography revealed slight leakage of contrast materials into hepatic subcapsular or subdiaphragmatic pericaval space. There was no evidence of propagation of extravasated contrast materials through the retroperitoneal space or spillage into the peritoneal space. After the tract was dilated by a bare stent, no patient experienced trans-stent bleeding and no serious procedure-related complications occurred. After successful shunt creation, variceal bleeding ceased in all patients. CONCLUSION: Transcaval TIPS placement is an effective and safe alternative treatment in patients with occluded previous TIPS and no hepatic veins suitable for new TIPS.
Esophageal and Gastric Varices/*surgery ; Feasibility Studies ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*surgery ; Human ; Male ; Middle Age ; Portal Vein/radiography/*surgery ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical/*methods ; *Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; Reoperation ; Stents ; Treatment Failure ; Vascular Patency ; Vena Cava, Inferior/radiography/*surgery

Variceal bleeding from enterostomy site is an unusual complication of portal hypertension. The bleeding, however, is often recurrent and may be fatal. The hemorrhage can be managed with local measures in most patients, but when these fail, surgical interventions or portosystemic shunt may be required. Herein, we report a case in which recurrent bleeding from stomal varices, developed after a colectomy for rectal cancer, was successfully treated by placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with coil embolization. Although several treatment options are available for this entity, we consider that TIPS with coil embolization offers minimally invasive and definitive treatment.
Colectomy/adverse effects ; Contrast Media/pharmacology ; Embolization, Therapeutic/*methods ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices/surgery ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods ; Treatment Outcome