Purpose: The effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) for pain relief after hip arthroplasty is a topic of ongoing debate. This study aimed to examine the association of PENG block with lower consumption of opioids during the first 24 hours following surgery compared to SFIB. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 60 patients scheduled for an elective posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized according to two groups: ultrasound-guided PENG block (PENG group) or SFIB (SFIB group). The 24-hour consumption of intravenous fentanyl was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included perioperative consumption of intravenous fentanyl, pain scores, sensorimotor function, and functional measures. Results: No significant intergroup difference was observed in 24-hour total fentanyl consumption (SFIB group: 117.4±99.8 μg, PENG group: 145.9±122.7 μg; mean difference: 22.6 μg [95% confidence interval –36.6 to 81.8]; P=0.45). No statistically significant difference in terms of fentanyl consumption in intraoperative, post-anesthetic care unit, at 6-hour and 48-hour postoperatively was observed between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in scores for rest and dynamic pain for all aspects of hip joint and surgical incision were observed between the groups (P>0.05). Better cutaneous sensory perception in the hip region and 12-hour postoperative quadriceps muscle strength at 90° were observed in the PENG group compared with the SFIB group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to SFIB, the addition of PENG block to multimodal analgesia did not reduce fentanyl consumption or pain scores after posterior approach THA.

Purpose: The effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) for pain relief after hip arthroplasty is a topic of ongoing debate. This study aimed to examine the association of PENG block with lower consumption of opioids during the first 24 hours following surgery compared to SFIB. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 60 patients scheduled for an elective posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized according to two groups: ultrasound-guided PENG block (PENG group) or SFIB (SFIB group). The 24-hour consumption of intravenous fentanyl was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included perioperative consumption of intravenous fentanyl, pain scores, sensorimotor function, and functional measures. Results: No significant intergroup difference was observed in 24-hour total fentanyl consumption (SFIB group: 117.4±99.8 μg, PENG group: 145.9±122.7 μg; mean difference: 22.6 μg [95% confidence interval –36.6 to 81.8]; P=0.45). No statistically significant difference in terms of fentanyl consumption in intraoperative, post-anesthetic care unit, at 6-hour and 48-hour postoperatively was observed between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in scores for rest and dynamic pain for all aspects of hip joint and surgical incision were observed between the groups (P>0.05). Better cutaneous sensory perception in the hip region and 12-hour postoperative quadriceps muscle strength at 90° were observed in the PENG group compared with the SFIB group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to SFIB, the addition of PENG block to multimodal analgesia did not reduce fentanyl consumption or pain scores after posterior approach THA.

Purpose: The effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) for pain relief after hip arthroplasty is a topic of ongoing debate. This study aimed to examine the association of PENG block with lower consumption of opioids during the first 24 hours following surgery compared to SFIB. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 60 patients scheduled for an elective posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized according to two groups: ultrasound-guided PENG block (PENG group) or SFIB (SFIB group). The 24-hour consumption of intravenous fentanyl was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included perioperative consumption of intravenous fentanyl, pain scores, sensorimotor function, and functional measures. Results: No significant intergroup difference was observed in 24-hour total fentanyl consumption (SFIB group: 117.4±99.8 μg, PENG group: 145.9±122.7 μg; mean difference: 22.6 μg [95% confidence interval –36.6 to 81.8]; P=0.45). No statistically significant difference in terms of fentanyl consumption in intraoperative, post-anesthetic care unit, at 6-hour and 48-hour postoperatively was observed between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in scores for rest and dynamic pain for all aspects of hip joint and surgical incision were observed between the groups (P>0.05). Better cutaneous sensory perception in the hip region and 12-hour postoperative quadriceps muscle strength at 90° were observed in the PENG group compared with the SFIB group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to SFIB, the addition of PENG block to multimodal analgesia did not reduce fentanyl consumption or pain scores after posterior approach THA.