1.Detection of HPV in cervical scrape specimens of cervical neoplasia using the polymerase chain reaction.
Seung Chul KIM ; Hak soon KIM ; Ju Cheol SONG ; Seo Ok KANG ; Young Bum CHA ; In Kwon HAN ; In Geol MOON ; Won Hee HAN ; Chong Taek PARK
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;35(9):1269-1279
No abstract available.
Polymerase Chain Reaction*
2.Detection of hepatitis viral nucleic acid sequences using polymerase chain reaction.
Korean Journal of Infectious Diseases 1991;23(4):229-233
No abstract available.
Hepatitis*
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction*
3.The Clinical Applicability of PCR and FISH in the Detection of Y-chromosome from Fetal Nucleated Red Blood Cells in Maternal Blood.
Jae Hyun CHUNG ; Kwan Ja JI ; Soon Ha YANG ; Jung Mi OH ; Cheong Rae ROH ; Young Kyu MOON ; Syng Wook KIM ; Je Ho LEE
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;40(12):2692-2697
No abstract available.
Erythrocytes*
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction*
4.Determination of sex by polymerase chain reaction (I).
Sang Hun CHA ; Tai Ho CHO ; Yong Sang SONG ; Hyo Pyo LEE
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;34(11):1568-1573
No abstract available.
Polymerase Chain Reaction*
5.Detection of human papillomaviruses in cervical interepithelial neoplasia and invasive carcinoma by in situ polymerase chain reaction.
Joon Cheol PARK ; Tae Sang KIM ; Dong Ja KIM ; Han Ik BAE ; Jeong Ran KIM
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;43(10):1738-1743
No abstract available.
Humans*
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction*
6.Detection of male-specific DNA by polymerase chain reaction.
Korean Journal of Perinatology 1993;4(3):391-400
No abstract available.
DNA*
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction*
7.Rapid determination of fetal Y-chromosome with polymerase chain reaction.
Sung Ho KANG ; Kyu Byung JUNG ; Ho Won HAN ; Young Chul KIM ; Sung Il NOH ; Ki Suk OH ; In Kwon HAN ; In Gul MOON
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;36(3):321-325
No abstract available.
Polymerase Chain Reaction*
8.Sequencing of Flic genes of Salmonella typhi, S. paratyphi A, S. paratyphi B, S. paratyphi C, and S. typhimurium and application for PCR to differentiate them
Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005;15(5):36-41
All Flic genes of Salmonella typhi, S. paratyphi A, S. paratyphi B, S. paratyphi C, and S. typhimurium code for phase 1 of H antigen (H:1) (d, a, b, c and i antigen respectively). The genes were sequenced on Sanger's principle by automatic sequenser (ABI, 3100 Avant, Genetic Analyser). The primer pairs for the Salmonella species were designed on the basis of the collected sequences. The results showed that PCR with these primers can clearly differentiate the five Salmonella strains, especially between S. paratyphi B and S. typhimurium.
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Salmonella
9.Some application of PCR in microbiology
Journal of Practical Medicine 2002;435(11):25-27
In microbiology, PCR was applied very early and widely step by step to diagnose the etiology of the infection. Especially in case of the culture of microorganism was unsuccessfully implemented or is very difficult or patient used the antibiotic before admission because PCR can be implemented in the dead microorganism. PCR contributes to verify more correctly.
microbiology
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
10.Broad Panel Respiratory Multiplex PCR (Pneumonia Panel) in improving overall survival, length of hospital stay, and antibiotic free days among patients with community acquired pneumonia - A randomized controlled trial
Michael Anderson G. Lam ; Guinevere N. Dy-Agra
Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development 2024;28(3):15-19
BACKGROUND
Broad Panel Respiratory Multiplex PCR (Pneumonia Panel) tests a panel of bacteria and viruses associated with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) which help streamline antimicrobial therapy. Recently, pneumonia panel aids clinicians in early streamlining of antimicrobials as opposed to waiting for bacterial culture results [2].
OBJECTIVETo determine whether the use of pneumonia panel improves the overall survival rate, length of hospital stay, and number of antibiotic free days among hospitalized CAP patients.
METHODOLOGYIn this RCT, adult patients admitted for CAP were randomized to perform pneumonia panel and sputum culture (pneumonia panel group) versus sputum culture only (control group). The results were relayed to the medical team and were incorporated into the medical records. Length of hospital stay, antibiotic free days in day 28, and mortality rates were the primary outcomes measured.
RESULTSEighty participants completed the study. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (p-value 0.073, 95% C.I.), duration of antibiotic therapy (p-value 0.332, 95% C.I.), and mortality rates (p-value 0.570, 95% C.I.) between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONRoutine use of pneumonia panel does not significantly reduce length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, and mortality rates among admitted patients with moderate to severe CAP. The benefit of pneumonia panel was seen on early detection of drug resistant pathogen resulting in early antibiotic escalation and shorter duration of antibiotic therapy. Further studies are necessary to show its benefit in the high risk population.
Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Pneumonia