Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women around the world, and it is also a common cause of death in female patients with malignant tumors in China, which seriously harms women's health. At present, with the application of comprehensive treatment approaches, breast cancer has become one of the most effective solid tumors. Platinum drugs are widely used in malignant tumors, and they are also commonly used as effective chemotherapeutic drugs for breast cancer. To regulate the application of platinum drugs in breast cancer, the experts from Breast Cancer Group, Branch of Oncologist, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, discuss and approve the "Guidelines for clinical application of platinum drugs in breast cancer (2023 edition)" . This guideline is developed from the "Expert consensus on the clinical application of platinums in advanced breast cancer (2020 version)" , which is updated from the latest evidence based on breast cancer at home and abroad, for platinum drugs in breast cancer clinical use, application scheme, efficacy analysis and treatment of adverse effects. This guideline aims to guide clinicians to use drugs rationally, and to further standardize the diagnosis and treatment.
Female ; Humans ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology* ; Platinum/therapeutic use* ; Consensus ; China

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is prone to recurrence and metastasis, which is the subtype of poorest prognosis. Chemotherapy is the main treatment, although there is lack of effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. The unsatisfactory efficacy of chemotherapy has been a bottleneck in improving the outcome of TNBC. Platinum compounds act directly on DNA to kill tumor cells, and they have a stronger killing effect on tumor cells carrying DNA damage repair (DDR) defects, which is an important entry point to improve the efficacy of TNBC. Biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of platinum drugs in TNBC treatment have always been a hot topic. The DDR pathway contains a large number of related genes, and recent studies have shown that deficiencies in the DDR pathway may be associated with the efficacy of platinum drugs, which is expected to be a biomarker for predicting the efficacy of platinum drugs in breast cancer treatment.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; DNA Damage ; DNA Repair ; Humans ; Pharmaceutical Preparations ; Platinum/therapeutic use* ; Platinum Compounds/therapeutic use* ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics*

BACKGROUNDNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a squamous-cell carcinoma especially prevailing among the natives of southern China. The regimen of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) that include platinum and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the standard treatment for NPC. However, its clinical use is limited by its toxicity. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the regimen of CCRT with taxanes and platinum versus the regimen of CCRT with 5-FU and platinum in NPC treatment.

METHODSMedline, the Cochrane library, and the Chinese medical literature database were searched for eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (Version 5.2).

RESULTSSix random controlled trials (RCTs) including 514 patients met our criteria. Meta-analysis showed that the regimen of CCRT with taxanes and platinum had an improved significant difference in complete remission (CR) and less incidence rate in adverse reactions such as gastrointestinal impairment grades III-IV, liver and kidney impairment grades I-II, and radiodermatitis grades III-IV versus the conventional regimen of CCRT with 5-FU and platinum, while the longterm effectiveness rate of overall survival, locoregional failure-free survival, or distant metastasis failure-free survival between the two groups was therapeutic equivalence.

CONCLUSIONSThe regimen of CCRT with taxanes and platinum in NPC therapy may be more efficient and safe compared to the conventional modality of 5-FU and platinum in CCRT. However, we need more high-quality studies of multi-center and randomized double-blind clinical trials to further compare, analyze, and confirm the findings.

Carcinoma ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Fluorouracil ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Platinum ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Taxoids ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

Platinum drugs are widely used in the treatment of various solid tumors, but their resistance to platinum is the most significant obstacle to successful treatment. Copper transporter 1 (CTR1) is the specific transporter for copper, and it mainly locates at the plasma membrane and plays a role in pumping copper into the cell. CTR1 is also the major platinum influx transporter and plays a key role in platinum resistance. The expression, polymorphism, and degradation of CTR1 affect platinum resistance in tumors. Therefore, CTR1 may be a potential predictive biomarker of platinum resistance and a therapeutic target for overcoming platinum resistance.
Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Cation Transport Proteins ; genetics ; metabolism ; Cisplatin ; therapeutic use ; Copper ; Copper Transporter 1 ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; genetics ; Platinum ; therapeutic use ; Research ; trends

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has shown promising results in patients with locally advanced penile cancer. However, no consensus exists on its applications for locally advanced penile cancer. Thus, it is unclear which kind of chemotherapy regimen is the best choice. Consequently, a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE was performed in March 2021 to assess the efficacy and safety of NAC for the treatment of patients with locally advanced penile cancer. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias in each study. This study synthesized 14 published studies. The study revealed that patients who achieved an objective response to NAC obtained a better survival outcome compared with those who did not achieve an objective response. In addition, the objective response rates (ORRs) and pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 0.57 and 0.11, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 toxicity was 0.36. Subgroup analysis found that the ORR and pCR of the taxane-platinum (TP) regimen group performed better than those of the nontaxane-platinum (NTP) regimen group (0.57 vs 0.54 and 0.14 vs 0.07, respectively). Moreover, the TP regimen group had more frequent toxicity than the NTP regimen group (0.41 vs 0.26). However, further studies were warranted to confirm the findings.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Male ; Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods* ; Penile Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Platinum ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEWhether gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy is superior to gemcitabine or platinum single-agent chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still in dispute, and the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combining platinum chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC.

METHODSWe searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from VIP, CBM, CNKI, the Cochrane library, PUBMED and EMBASE. We traced the related references and experts in this field and communicated with other authors to obtain the information that has not been found. We made quality assessment of qualified RCTs assessed by the exclusion and inclusion criteria and used RevMan 5.0 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform meta-analysis.

RESULTSFour RCTs were eligible and included 984 patients. Meta analysis results suggested that: compared with gecitabine single-agent chemotherapy, the combination had a statistically significant benefit in increasing the response rate (OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.79-6.05, P = 0.000 1) and 2-year survival rate (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.45-7.12, P = 0.004) while increased the risk of the incidence of adverse reactions, especially the grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 8.16, 95% CI: 1.71-39.07, P = 0.009); compared with cisplatin single-agent chemotherapy, the combination had a statistically significant benefit in increasing the response rate (OR = 3.51, 95% CI: 2.20-5.60, P < 0.01) and 1-year survival rate (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16-2.41, P = 0.006) while increased the risk of the incidence of adverse reactions, especially the grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (OR = 28.55, 95% CI: 14.06-57.04, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONCompared with single-agent chemotherapy, the combining can significantly improve the efficiency and survival rate while increase the toxicity rare. The results still need to be proved by high quality RCTs.

Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Deoxycytidine ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Platinum ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUNDCombination paclitaxel and carboplatin is currently a first-line regimen for ovarian cancer. However, many patients develop tumor recurrence or drug resistance to this regimen. The study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of an oxaliplatin + epirubicin + ifosfamide regimen for the treatment of recurrent and drug-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODSA retrospective analysis of 73 patients with recurrent and drug-resistant ovarian cancer was performed; 38 cases of them received oxaliplatin + epirubicin + ifosfamide regimens (IAP group), 35 patients received non-oxaliplatinbased chemotherapy regimens (control group). The therapeutic effects and side effects of the oxaliplatin + epirubicin + ifosfamide regimen were analyzed and summarized. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare progression-free and overall survival between the two groups.

RESULTSOf the 38 patients in the IAP group, 14 patients (36.84%) achieved complete remission, 12 (31.58%) achieved partial remission, 2 (5.26%) achieved stable disease and 10 (26.32%) developed progressive disease. The overall effective rate (complete or partial remission) of the IAP regime was 68.42%. While, of the 35 patients in the control group, 12 patients (34.29%) achieved complete remission, 3 (8.57%) achieved partial remission, 5 (14.29%) achieved stable disease and 15 (42.86%) developed progressive disease. The overall effective rate was 42.86%, which was lower than that in the IAP group (P = 0.035, χ(2) = 4.836). Progression-free survival was 9.5 months (0-64 months) in the IAP group vs. 3 months (0-74 months) in the non-oxaliplatin group (P = 0.014 by Kaplan-Meier survival curves; HR = 2.260; 95%CI 1.117-4.573; P = 0.023 by Cox proportional hazards regression). Median overall survival was 46 months (9-124 months) in the IAP group vs. 35 months (9-108 months) in non-oxaliplatin group (P = 0.018 by Kaplan-Meier survival curves; HR = 2.272; 95%CI 1.123-4.598; P = 0.022 by Cox proportional hazards regression). In IAP group, 15.79% (6/38) of the patients suffered grade III-IV bone marrow arrest. The main non-hematological side effects of the IAP regimen included nausea and vomiting (21.05%, 8/38), peripheral neurotoxicity (15.79%, 6/38) and hepatic or renal lesions (2.63%, 1/38). The main side effects of the two chemotherapy regimens showed no statistical difference.

CONCLUSIONThe oxaliplatin-based IAP regimen is potentially effective for salvage chemotherapy in patients with recurrent and drug-resistant ovarian cancer, with a better therapeutic effect and tolerable side effects.

Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial ; drug therapy ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; therapeutic use ; Ovarian Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Platinum ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo compare the effect of first-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with lung metastases from triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODSSixty-five eligible patients were divided into platinum-treated group and non-platinum-treated group according to the first-line therapy. Factors predicting the chemotherapeutic efficacy included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response (OR).

RESULTSIn the platinum-treated group of 32 patients, 2 cases (6.3%) achieved CR, 16 cases (50.0%) achieved PR, 11 (34.4%) cases achieved SD, and 3 patients (9.4%) achieved PD. In the non-platinum-treated group of 33 patients, 2 cases (6.1%) achieved CR, 6 cases (18.2%) achieved PR, 16 cases (48.5%) achieved SD, and 9 cases (27.3%) achieved PD. Median PFS was significantly longer in the platinum-treated group than in the non-platinum-treated group (10 months vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.012), and OS was also improved (32 months vs. 22 months, P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis of several factors including local-regional lymph node involvement, lung metastasis-related symptoms, first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, disease-free interval, size and number of lung lesions, showed that first-line platinum-based chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for TNBC patients with lung metastases.

CONCLUSIONSCompared with non-platinum-based chemotherapy, the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy can improve PFS and OS in TNBC patients with metastases confined to the lungs.

Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Neoplasms, Second Primary ; Platinum ; therapeutic use ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms ; drug therapy

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is one of the driver genes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have shown that the efficacy of pemetrexed in HER2-mutant NSCLC is controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of pemetrexed combined with platinum chemotherapy in patients with HER2-mutant and HER2 wild-type lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The clinical data of 106 cases of EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, KRAS, BRAF, RET and MET-negative patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who diagnosed by histopathology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively reviewed. The relationships between HER2 gene status, clinical characteristics and response and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: All of the 106 patients' HER2 status were determined. HER2 mutations occurred in 32 cases (30.2%), no mutations in 74 cases (69.8%). HER2 mutations were common in young, non-smoking and female patients. All patients received first-line pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of patients with HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma were significantly higher than those without HER2 mutations (40.6% vs 14.9%, χ²=8.464, P=0.004; 93.8% vs 68.9%, χ²=6.327, P=0.012), and the difference was statistically significant. According to univariate analysis, the PFS was significantly associated with the brain metastases, maintenance chemotherapy and HER2 gene status (P<0.05), but not with age, gender, smoking history, oligometastases, liver metastases and type of platinum (P>0.05). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that HER2 mutation was an independent positive prognostic factor of PFS (P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with first-line pemetrexed combined with platinum chemotherapy have greater clinical benefit than HER2 wild-type patients.
Adenocarcinoma of Lung ; drug therapy ; genetics ; pathology ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Genes, erbB-2 ; genetics ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Pemetrexed ; therapeutic use ; Platinum ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive disease arising from pleural mesothelial cells. Advanced pleural mesothelioma has a poor prognosis, with a median survival of no more than 15 months. First line standard chemotherapy regimen recommended is Pemetrexed based chemotherapy regimen, with or without bevacizumab. There is no consensus on whether patients who have received first-line standard chemotherapy can benefit from pemetrexed maintenance chemotherapy. The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed maintenance therapy (PMT) after treatment with a pemetrexed and platinum regimen for patients with MPM. METHODS: A total of 40 MPM patients were collected from Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2013 to January 2018, eligible patients were unresectable MPM, without disease progression following 4 to 6 cycles of pemetrexed and platinum, including pemetrexed maintenance therapy group (22 cases) and observation group (18 cases). The last follow-up was conducted in January 2020. The primary endpoint were progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival (OS), the efficacy, adverse reactions of PMT. RESULTS: The median PFS in the PMT arm was longer than that in the observation arm (8.5 mon vs 3 mon, P=0.008), but there was no significant difference in median OS (26.4 mon vs 15.7 mon, P=0.177). Objective response rate (ORR) of two group were 22.7% and 0%, respectively. The grade 3-4 toxicity in PMT group included grade 4 neutropenia in 1 patient (4.5%), grade 3 neutropenia in 1 patient (4.5%), grade 4 anemia in 1 patient (4.5%) and grade 3 nausea and anorexia in 1 patient (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS Pemetrexed maintenance therapy following initial pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy improve PFS in patients with MPM, and is well tolerated.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Cisplatin/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Mesothelioma/drug therapy* ; Mesothelioma, Malignant ; Neutropenia ; Pemetrexed/therapeutic use* ; Platinum/therapeutic use* ; Pleural Neoplasms/drug therapy*