1.Plagiarism.
Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2008;29(3):167-174
No abstract available.
Plagiarism
2.Plagiarism: Challenges and Criteria.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2017;38(4):239-239
No abstract available.
Plagiarism*
3.Plagiarism: Challenges and Criteria.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2017;38(4):239-239
No abstract available.
Plagiarism*
4.Plagiarism Detection.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2013;34(6):371-371
No abstract available.
Plagiarism*
5.The Detection of Plagiarism.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2017;38(1):1-1
No abstract available.
Plagiarism*
6.Letter to the Editor: Plagiarism in Scientific Writings: Is There Any Way Out?.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2017;32(8):1377-1378
No abstract available.
Plagiarism*
7.Plagiarism
Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2019;49(2):59-59
No abstract available.
Plagiarism
8.Plagiarism: a Viewpoint from India.
Durga Prasanna MISRA ; Vinod RAVINDRAN ; Anupam WAKHLU ; Aman SHARMA ; Vikas AGARWAL ; Vir Singh NEGI
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2017;32(11):1734-1735
No abstract available.
India*
;
Plagiarism*
9.Journal of Clinical Neurology: Notice of Concern.
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2009;5(4):203-203
We have noticed that several sentences in a review article by Drs. Jung and Roh published in J Clin Neurol [Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in cerebrovascular disease, J Clin Neurol 2008;4(4):139-147] are identical from those in an article by Dr. Rouhl et al. published in Stroke [Endothelial progenitor cell research in stroke: a potential shift in pathophysiological and therapeutical concepts, Stroke 2008;39(7):2158-2165]. The text of the Jung and Roh article neither mentions nor cites the article by Rouhl and colleagues. A review of this case by the editorial committee of Journal of Clinical Neurology concluded that Drs. Jung and Roh plagiarized the paper by Rouhl and colleagues. Drs. Jung and Roh have acknowledged the plagiarism in the original manuscript and given clear credit for the work of Dr. Rouhl and colleagues in a letter published in this issue as an "Apology". I regret that this has happened and that this plagiarism was not identified prior to publication.
Neurology
;
Plagiarism
;
Publications
;
Stem Cells
;
Stroke
10.Plagiarism Continues to Affect Scholarly Journals.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2017;32(2):183-185
I have encountered 3 cases of plagiarism as editor of the Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS). The first one was copying figures from a JKMS article without citation, the second was submission of a copied manuscript of a published article to JKMS, and the third was publishing a copied JKMS article in another journal. The first and third cases violated copyrights of JKMS, but the violating journals made no action on the misconduct. The second and third cases were slightly modified copies of the source articles but similarity check by the Crosscheck could not identify the text overlap initially and after one year reported 96% overlap for the second case. The similarity of the third case was reported 3%. The Crosscheck must upgrade its system for better reliable screening of text plagiarism. The copy of the second case was committed by a corrupt Chinese editing company and also by some unethical researchers. In conclusion, plagiarism still threatens the trustworthiness of the publishing enterprises and is a cumbersome burden for editors of scholarly journals. We require a better system to increase the vigilance and to prevent the misconduct.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Copyright
;
Humans
;
Mass Screening
;
Plagiarism*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail