BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the subclinical balance dysfunction in elderly people taking antiepileptic drugs. METHODS: We recruited sixty-three patients who were at least 50 years old, without complaint of dizziness or imbalance, and on a stable dose of carbamazepine, lamotrigine or levetiracetam. Their balance scores were compared with those of newly diagnosed untreated age- and sex-matched epilepsy patients (n=21). All the subjects underwent balance measurements that included an activities-specific balance confidence scale, quantitative caloric and rotational chair testing and posturography. The spectral frequency analysis of body sway while standing upright was also investigated. Sensory organization (SOT) and motor control tests were done by computerized dynamic posturography (CDP). RESULTS: The sway distance and area of center of pressure significantly increased in the patients treated with carbamazepine. Spectral frequency analysis of this group showed a significantly increased spectral power at low and middle frequencies on the antero-posterior (Y) plane and at low frequencies on the lateral (X) plane. CDP showed no significant differences in SOT results among the groups. However, motor control test revealed increased latencies and slowed adaptations in the carbamazepine group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that newer drugs such as lamotrigine or levetiracetam may induce less disequilibrium than carbamazepine in older people on monotherapy for epilepsy. The disturbance is likely related to slowed central postural reflexes.
Aged ; Anticonvulsants ; Carbamazepine ; Cytidine Diphosphate ; Dizziness ; Epilepsy ; Humans ; Piracetam ; Triazines

Hiccups may be considered a form of myoclonus of diaphragm. Valproic acid has been considered the drug of choice in treatment of intractable hiccups; however, its various adverse events limit its use in the clinical basis, especially in elderly or complicated patients. Levetiracetam was known as a safe antiepileptic drug. However, the anti-hiccup property of the levetiracetam has been rarely reported. We report a 69-year old male patient who developed sudden persistent hiccups and was successfully treated with levetiracetam. Levetiracetam should be considered as alternative treatment option in selected patients with intractable hiccups.
Aged ; Diaphragm ; Hiccup ; Humans ; Male ; Myoclonus ; Piracetam ; Valproic Acid

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam adjunctive therapy for reducing the rate of seizure frequency in children with intractable pediatric epilepsy. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 86 patients with intractable pediatric epilepsy who visited our hospital between March 1989 and February 2009. Levetiracetam was included in the previous anticonvulsant regimen for at least 6 months and the reduction in the rate of seizure frequency was determined in follow-up examinations. We analyzed demographic data, seizure types, antiepileptic drug history, levetiracetam dose, adverse effects of levetiracetam therapy, treatment outcome, electroencephalogram findings, etc. RESULTS: More than 50% reduction in the seizure frequency was observed in 62 of the 86 (72.1%) patients; 44 patients (51.1%) became seizure free, while the seizure frequency increased in 5.8% patients. The associations between seizure reduction rate and age, associated diseases, seizure types, and seizure frequency before treatment were not significant. However, the duration of disease, dose of levetiracetam, duration and frequency of anticonvulsant administration before levetiracetam therapy were significantly correlated. Electroencephalogram findings and the cause of epilepsy showed partial correlation. Forty (46%) patients showed adverse symptoms; the symptoms in the order of their frequency were somnolence, hyperactivity, irritability, aggressiveness, tiredness, etc. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study provide the evidence that levetiracetam adjunctive therapy is efficacious and well tolerated in various refractory childhood epilepsy cases.
Child ; Electroencephalography ; Epilepsy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Piracetam ; Seizures ; Treatment Outcome

Levetiracetam has not been reported to cause purpura. We report a case of purpura associated with levetiracetam. A 81-year-old man suffered from post-stroke seizure. Seizure was well controlled with valproate. Valproate was discontinued due to pancytopenia and levetiracetam was prescribed when he was admitted with pneumonia. A few days later, he recovered from pancytopenia and pneumonia. However, he was rehospitalized due to multiple variable sized-purpura on the whole body surface without thrombocytopenia. After discontinuing levetiracetam, purpura disappeared.
Aged, 80 and over ; Humans ; Pancytopenia ; Piracetam ; Pneumonia ; Purpura ; Seizures ; Thrombocytopenia ; Valproic Acid

BACKGROUND: Seizures occur in 2-20% of stroke patients. Recent studies have reported that post-stroke seizures are associated with poorer functional outcomesand higher mortality. However there are no official guidelines on how to use antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in stroke-related seizures. In this study we surveyed neurologists and neurosurgeons and compared the responses of subgroups categorized by department, specialty and workplace discrimination using a questionnaire containing questions concerning the present tendency to use AEDs in stroke patients. METHODS: 256 neurologists and neurosurgeons participated in the survey. The research instrument was a questionnaire comprising 9 parts and 30 questions. The questions concerned stroke mechanism, the prophylactic use of AEDs, and the choice of AED in early and late onset post-stroke seizures. RESULTS: Tendencies to use prophylactic AEDs in stroke differed depending on specialty and workplace(neurologist vs. neurosurgeon; 17.8% vs. 83.1%, p<0.001, hospital vs. university staff; 46.2% vs. 28.4%, p=0.05). The most commonly used prophylactic AEDs were valproic acid (75%) and levetiracetam (60%). Carbamazepine was the most commonly used AED and phenytoin and phenobarbital were still used in all subgroups to treat post-stroke seizures. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences between neurologists (17.8%) and neurosurgeons (83.1%) in the use of prophylactic AEDs after stroke. Valproic acid and levetiracetam are considered first-line prophylactic AEDs by neurosurgeon. Phenytoin and phenobarbital are still used in post-stroke seizure although they have been reported to have an adverse influence on motor recovery. We suggest that proper guidelines should be established for the use of AEDs in stroke-related seizures.
Anticonvulsants ; Carbamazepine ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Humans ; Phenobarbital ; Phenytoin ; Piracetam ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Seizures ; Stroke ; Valproic Acid

PURPOSE: Levetiracetam hasa been used in adjuvant therapy. It has also been used in monotherapy in other countries and therefore, we also studied the effect and efficacy of Levetiracetam monotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the types of epilepsy, EEG, and drug dosage. We studied 101 epilepsy children treated by Levitiracetam monotherapy who had visited our hospital from August 2007 to July 2009. RESULTS: Participants were aged one month to 20 years. The mean age of Levetiacetam therapy was initially 11+/-4 years (from 3 years to 21 years), and the type of epilepsy was partial in 57.4% and generalized in 42.6%. The mean dose I initially began at 6+/-4 mg/kg/day (from 2 mg/kg/day to 30 mg/kg/day) with a mean final dose of 30+/-8 mg/kg/day (from 6 mg/kg/day to 60 mg/kg/day), a mean duration of therapy of 21+/-11months, and a duration of therapy ranging from one to 38months. Further, 60.3% of patients became seizure free and 96.9% exhibited at least a 50% reduction in seizure over a 12 month period. Side effects included behavioral change (8), asthenia (2), cognitive change (1), rash (2), headache (5), inadequate seizure control (2), and increased seizure (5). Levetiracetam was discontinued due to inadequate seizure control (2), increased seizure (5) and side effects (2). CONCLUSION: We studied the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy of Levetiracetam and found that it was effective and tolerable in monotherapy for epilepsy.
Aged ; Anticonvulsants ; Asthenia ; Child ; Electroencephalography ; Epilepsy ; Exanthema ; Headache ; Humans ; Piracetam ; Retrospective Studies ; Seizures

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the safety and the reduction in seizure frequency of levetiracetam adjunctive therapy for pediatric epilepsy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 29 pediatric intractable epilepsy patients(male 19 and female 10). They all experienced more than two seizures per month, and were not controlled by initial combined two or more conventional antiepileptic drugs. They were followed up for over at least 3 months after prescribed levetiracetam from October 2005 to December 2006 at Sanggyepaik Hospital. RESULTS: 13 patients(44.8%) out of 29 showed reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50%, and 7 patients(24.1%) more than 75%. Of 14 patients who had generalized epilepsies including 9 patients with Lennox?Gastaut syndrome, 2 patients with severe myolonic epilepsy in infancy, 1 patient with late?onset infantile spasm, and 2 patients with undetermined generalized epilepsy, 4 patients(28.6%) showed seizure reduction of more than 50% and 1 patient(7.1%) of more than 75%. Of 15 patients who had partial seizures, 9 patients(60.0%) showed seizure reduction of more than 50% and 6 patients(40.0%) of more than 75%. There were significant differences between generalized seizure and partial seizure in those with more than 75% seizure reduction rate(Fisher's exact test, P=0.03). The mean maintenance dosage of drug was 34.8 mg/kg per day(5.7?71.4 mg/kg per day). The number of patients who showed adverse reactions was 9(31.0%) patients:increased seizure frequency in 4(13.8%) patients who discontinued levetiracetam, sedation in 3 patients and increased secretion and loss of appetite in one patient respectively in a descending order of of frequency. CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam is believed to be an effective, and safe anticonvulsant when used as an adjunctive therapy for various refractory childhood epilepsies.
Anticonvulsants ; Appetite ; Child ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy, Generalized ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Medical Records ; Piracetam ; Retrospective Studies ; Seizures ; Spasms, Infantile

OBJECTIVETo evaluate of the efficacy and safety of adjunctive levetiracetam (LEV) in children younger than 4 years with refractory epilepsy.

METHODSOne hundred and twelve children at age of 4 months to 4 years with refractory epilepsy received LEV as adjunctive therapy. LEV was administered in two equal daily doses of 10 mg/kg. The dose was increased by 10 mg/kg every week up to the target dose (20-40 mg/kg). The efficacy and tolerability were evaluated.

RESULTSAt an average follow-up period of 13 months (6-22 months), LEV administration was found to be effective in 43 children (38.4%) (responders showing more than a 50% decrease in seizure frequency) and 14 children (12.5%) became seizure-free. Fifty-three children (47.3%) did not respond to the treatment and 2 children (1.8%) worsened. The therapy-related adverse events were mild, including restlessness, reduction in sleep time, night terrors, debility, somnolence, nausea and vomiting. The adverse events were either tolerable or resolved in time with dosage reduction in most of children, and only 3 cases required discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONSLEV as adjunctive therapy is effective and well-tolerated in children younger than 4 years with refractory epilepsy, suggesting that it represents a valid option for the treatment of refractory epilepsy in this age group.

Anticonvulsants ; therapeutic use ; Child, Preschool ; Epilepsy ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Piracetam ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVELevetiracetam has been widely used for childhood epilepsy, but there is no high quality evidence to support its use. This study performed a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of levetiracetam therapy for childhood epilepsy.

METHODSThe papers related to levetiracetam therapy for childhood epilepsy published up to March, 2009 were retrieved electronically from the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Database, Wanfang and Weipu Chinese Journals Full-text Database. The relevant papers on randomized control trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were studied by meta analysis.

RESULTSTwo papers that met the inclusion criteria were included. The first paper involved 198 patients, including 108 cases in the levetiracetam therapy group and 97 cases in the placebo group. Seven cases (6.9%) were seizure free in the levetiracetam therapy group compared with 1 case (1%) in the placebo group (p<0.01) 14 weeks after treatment. Levetiracetam therapy decreased significantly the frequency of seizures compared with the placebo treatment. The second paper involved 39 patients, including 21 cases in the levetiracetam therapy group and 18 cases in the oxcarbazepine therapy group. Nineteen cases (90.5%) were seizure-free in the levetiracetam therapy group compared with 13 cases (72.2%) in the oxcarbazepine therapy group (P=0.410) during a follow-up of 12-24 months. The adverse effects in the levetiracetam therapy group were not significantly different from the placebo and the oxcarbazepine therapy groups.

CONCLUSIONSThe current evidence shows that levetiracetam therapy is effective for childhood epilepsy. However, it needs to be proved by the multi-centre, large sample RCTs.

Anticonvulsants ; therapeutic use ; Child ; Epilepsy ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Piracetam ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

One month following carbon monoxide poisoning, a 39 year-old man developed incontinence, memory impairment, disorientation and emotional instability. He was hospitalized 7weeks later, and during hospitalization he exhibited myoclonic movements of the neck and lower limbs. He was given piracetam intravenously for 11 days. The myoclonus was significantly reduced by the third day of treatment and had disappeared by the seventh day. There was no recurrence following cessation of treatment.
Adult ; Carbon Monoxide Poisoning/complications* ; Human ; Male ; Myoclonus/drug therapy ; Myoclonus/etiology* ; Piracetam/therapeutic use* ; Pyrrolidinones/therapeutic use*