Objective:It explores critical issues of discounting in health technology assessment to provide a reference for improving discount rates in China.Methods:Based on literature review and empirical cases,it compares and analyzes the practical experience of the UK and Canada and the basis for discount rate setting in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and guidelines of various countries.Results:It is found that the social time preference and social opportunity cost approach provide research perspectives for discount rate calculation.How-ever,there are differences in the choice of discounting in international guidelines and pharmacoeconomic evaluation practices,which may reflect differences among countries regarding economic environment,healthcare systems,and values.Conclusion:It calls for more basic research on discounting and suggests the formulation of discount rates that align with our China's economic environment to provide deci-sion-makers with a reliable information foundation.

Objective:It explores critical issues of discounting in health technology assessment to provide a reference for improving discount rates in China.Methods:Based on literature review and empirical cases,it compares and analyzes the practical experience of the UK and Canada and the basis for discount rate setting in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and guidelines of various countries.Results:It is found that the social time preference and social opportunity cost approach provide research perspectives for discount rate calculation.How-ever,there are differences in the choice of discounting in international guidelines and pharmacoeconomic evaluation practices,which may reflect differences among countries regarding economic environment,healthcare systems,and values.Conclusion:It calls for more basic research on discounting and suggests the formulation of discount rates that align with our China's economic environment to provide deci-sion-makers with a reliable information foundation.

Objective:It explores critical issues of discounting in health technology assessment to provide a reference for improving discount rates in China.Methods:Based on literature review and empirical cases,it compares and analyzes the practical experience of the UK and Canada and the basis for discount rate setting in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and guidelines of various countries.Results:It is found that the social time preference and social opportunity cost approach provide research perspectives for discount rate calculation.How-ever,there are differences in the choice of discounting in international guidelines and pharmacoeconomic evaluation practices,which may reflect differences among countries regarding economic environment,healthcare systems,and values.Conclusion:It calls for more basic research on discounting and suggests the formulation of discount rates that align with our China's economic environment to provide deci-sion-makers with a reliable information foundation.

Objective:It explores critical issues of discounting in health technology assessment to provide a reference for improving discount rates in China.Methods:Based on literature review and empirical cases,it compares and analyzes the practical experience of the UK and Canada and the basis for discount rate setting in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and guidelines of various countries.Results:It is found that the social time preference and social opportunity cost approach provide research perspectives for discount rate calculation.How-ever,there are differences in the choice of discounting in international guidelines and pharmacoeconomic evaluation practices,which may reflect differences among countries regarding economic environment,healthcare systems,and values.Conclusion:It calls for more basic research on discounting and suggests the formulation of discount rates that align with our China's economic environment to provide deci-sion-makers with a reliable information foundation.

Objective:It explores critical issues of discounting in health technology assessment to provide a reference for improving discount rates in China.Methods:Based on literature review and empirical cases,it compares and analyzes the practical experience of the UK and Canada and the basis for discount rate setting in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and guidelines of various countries.Results:It is found that the social time preference and social opportunity cost approach provide research perspectives for discount rate calculation.How-ever,there are differences in the choice of discounting in international guidelines and pharmacoeconomic evaluation practices,which may reflect differences among countries regarding economic environment,healthcare systems,and values.Conclusion:It calls for more basic research on discounting and suggests the formulation of discount rates that align with our China's economic environment to provide deci-sion-makers with a reliable information foundation.

Objective:It explores critical issues of discounting in health technology assessment to provide a reference for improving discount rates in China.Methods:Based on literature review and empirical cases,it compares and analyzes the practical experience of the UK and Canada and the basis for discount rate setting in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and guidelines of various countries.Results:It is found that the social time preference and social opportunity cost approach provide research perspectives for discount rate calculation.How-ever,there are differences in the choice of discounting in international guidelines and pharmacoeconomic evaluation practices,which may reflect differences among countries regarding economic environment,healthcare systems,and values.Conclusion:It calls for more basic research on discounting and suggests the formulation of discount rates that align with our China's economic environment to provide deci-sion-makers with a reliable information foundation.

Objective:It explores critical issues of discounting in health technology assessment to provide a reference for improving discount rates in China.Methods:Based on literature review and empirical cases,it compares and analyzes the practical experience of the UK and Canada and the basis for discount rate setting in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and guidelines of various countries.Results:It is found that the social time preference and social opportunity cost approach provide research perspectives for discount rate calculation.How-ever,there are differences in the choice of discounting in international guidelines and pharmacoeconomic evaluation practices,which may reflect differences among countries regarding economic environment,healthcare systems,and values.Conclusion:It calls for more basic research on discounting and suggests the formulation of discount rates that align with our China's economic environment to provide deci-sion-makers with a reliable information foundation.

Objective:It explores critical issues of discounting in health technology assessment to provide a reference for improving discount rates in China.Methods:Based on literature review and empirical cases,it compares and analyzes the practical experience of the UK and Canada and the basis for discount rate setting in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and guidelines of various countries.Results:It is found that the social time preference and social opportunity cost approach provide research perspectives for discount rate calculation.How-ever,there are differences in the choice of discounting in international guidelines and pharmacoeconomic evaluation practices,which may reflect differences among countries regarding economic environment,healthcare systems,and values.Conclusion:It calls for more basic research on discounting and suggests the formulation of discount rates that align with our China's economic environment to provide deci-sion-makers with a reliable information foundation.

Objective:To investigate status quo of social support and social function in homeless schizophrenics.Methods:A total of 468 schizophrenics who received treatment in Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were included in this study. They were divided into homeless group ( n = 310) and non-homeless group ( n = 158) according to whether they had homeless behaviors. The basic information of admitted patients, level of social support and disease severity were surveyed among admitted patients using self-made questionnaire regarding basic information of admitted patients, Social Support Rating Scale, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Results:The numbers of schizophrenics in the aspects including male gender, rural household registration, non-local residents, no occupation, unmarried status, low level education, and age at 30-50 years in the homeless group were significantly higher than those in the non-homeless group ( χ2 = 3.58, 20.14, 18.69, 46.29, 33.16, 24.38, 29.75, all P < 0.05). The score for each SSRS domain and total score in the homeless group were significantly lower than those in the non-homeless group [(15.35 ± 5.42) points, (4.34 ± 2.78) points, (6.48 ± 1.89) points, (26.23 ± 7.35) points; (18.99 ± 3.78) points, (6.35 ± 3.23) points, (7.82 ± 2.01) points, (32.59 ± 7.02) points, t = 6.34, 10.52, 12.83, 14.68, all P < 0.001]. The score for each BPRS domain and total score in the homeless group were significantly higher than those in the non-homeless group [(19.35 ± 5.85) points, (22.58 ± 2.73) points, (18.74 ± 2.46) points, (18.48 ± 0.25) points, (16.38 ± 3.12) points, (79.43 ± 3.64) points; (12.92 ± 4.23) points, (16.24 ± 3.66) points, (16.97 ± 3.77) points, (10.58 ± 3.34) points, (6.36 ± 4.23) points, (62.72 ± 2.57) points, t = 9.92, 7.02, 6.33, 10.35, 15.74, 28.46, all P < 0.001]. Conclusion:The poor individual condition and low level of social support in patients with schizophrenia are important factors that cause homelessness.

Objective:To explore the anger emotional state,traits and expression characteristics in patients with schizophrenia with violent behavior in community.Methods:Twenty-five patients with schizopnrenia with a history of violent behavior among the community rehabilitation institutions were selected as the violent behavior group,and 74 patients with schizopnrenia without a history of violent behavior were selected as the nonviolent behavior group.The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale(BPRS)was used to assess psychiatric symptoms,and the State-Trait An-ger Expression Inventory(STAXI)was used to assess anger characteristics.Results:Compared with the nonviolent behavior group,the violent behavior group had significantly higher scores in the trait of anger(patient dimension score,rational dimension score)and expression of anger(total score,restraint dimension score)[(28.0±23.8)vs.(19.6±13.3),(55.0±30.6)vs.(40.0±21.5),(34.2±11.6)vs.(27.3±10.7),(56.0±26.1)vs.(33.7±21.1),Ps＜0.05].Higher scores of rationality dimension of anger trait(OR=3.69,95％CI:1.43-7.98)and re-straint dimension of anger expression(OR=3.25,95％CI:1.39-7.47)were risk factors for violent behaviors.Conclusion:Compared with patients with schizopnrenia without violent behavior,patients with violent behavior history may show more lack of rationality,and poorer anger restraint.