Children living in the internally displaced person (IDP) camp are at higher risk of stunting. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence and to identify the associated factors of stunting among children aged 6–59 months at Myaing-Gyi-Ngu IDP camp in Kayin State, Myanmar. According to the World Health Organization Child Growth Standards, children with a height-for-age Z-scores below −2 standard deviation of the reference median (HAZ ≤ −2) were classified as stunted. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the strong predictors. Prevalence of stunting has been found very high (59.4%). Adjusted model revealed that children living with illiterate mothers (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–3.24), being third/later-birth child (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.13–3.14), consuming less than 4 food groups (OR, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.94–9.16), and older age of child (OR, 6.36 for 13–24 months; 95% CI, 2.74–14.74, 7.45 for 25–36 months; 95% CI, 3.21–17.25 and 12.75 for 37–59 months; 95% CI, 5.51–29.52) had higher odds of becoming stunted. The levels of support availability, presumed support and support received of mothers were generally low, but no significant associations were observed. In conclusion, this study showed high prevalence of stunting, but low dietary diversity and social support in the IDP camp. Due to the significant association of dietary diversity scores with stunting, interventions aiming at improving dietary diversity should be taken to reduce the stunting among children in the IDPs camp.
Child ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Growth Disorders ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mothers ; Myanmar ; Prevalence ; World Health Organization

health concerns, triggering an escalated burden to healthsystems worldwide. The pandemic has altered people’sliving norms, yet coherently escalating countries’ socio-economic instability. This real-time consensus review aimsto describe the epidemiological trends of COVID-19pandemic across six South-East Asian nations, and country-specific experiences on pandemic preparedness, responsesand interventions.Methods: Consensus-driven approach between authorsfrom the six selected countries was applied. Countryspecific policy documents, official government mediastatements, mainstream news portals, global statisticsdatabases and latest published literature available betweenJanuary-October 2020 were utilised for information retrieval.Situational and epidemiological trend analyses wereconducted. Country-specific interventions and challengeswere described. Based on evidence appraised, a descriptiveframework was considered through a consensus. Theauthors subsequently outlined the lessons learned,challenges ahead and interventions that needs to be in placeto control the pandemic. Results: The total number of people infected with COVID-19between 1 January and 16 November 2020 had reached48,520 in Malaysia, 58,124 in Singapore, 3,875 in Thailand,470,648 in Indonesia, 409,574 in Philippines and 70,161 inMyanmar. The total number of people infected with COVID-19 in the six countries from January to 31 October 2020 were936,866 cases and the mortality rate was 2.42%. Indonesiahad 410,088 cases with a mortality rate of 3.38%, Philippineshad 380,729 cases with a mortality rate of 1.90%, Myanmarhad 52,706 cases with a mortality rate of 2.34%, Thailand had3,780 cases with a mortality rate of 1.56%, Malaysia had31,548 cases with a mortality rate of 0.79%, and Singaporehad 58,015 cases with a mortality rate of 0.05% over the 10-month period. Each country response varied depending onits real-time situations based on the number of active casesand economic situation of the country. Conclusion: The number of COVID-19 cases in thesecountries waxed and waned over the 10-month period, thenumber of cases may be coming down in one country, andvice versa in another. Each country, if acting alone, will notbe able to control this pandemic. Sharing of information andresources across nations is the key to successful control ofthe pandemic. There is a need to reflect on how thepandemic affects individuals, families and the community asa whole. There are many people who cannot afford to beisolated from their families and daily wage workers whocannot afford to miss work. Are we as a medical community,only empathising with our patients or are we doing ourutmost to uphold them during this time of crisis? Are thereany other avenues which can curb the epidemic whilereducing its impact on the health and socio-economiccondition of the individual, community and the nation?