1.Characteristics and Prevalence of Sequelae after COVID-19: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Se Ju LEE ; Yae Jee BAEK ; Su Hwan LEE ; Jung Ho KIM ; Jin Young AHN ; Jooyun KIM ; Ji Hoon JEON ; Hyeri SEOK ; Won Suk CHOI ; Dae Won PARK ; Yunsang CHOI ; Kyoung-Ho SONG ; Eu Suk KIM ; Hong Bin KIM ; Jae-Hoon KO ; Kyong Ran PECK ; Jae-Phil CHOI ; Jun Hyoung KIM ; Hee-Sung KIM ; Hye Won JEONG ; Jun Yong CHOI
Infection and Chemotherapy 2025;57(1):72-80
Background:
The World Health Organization has declared the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency. However, this did not indicate the end of COVID-19. Several months after the infection, numerous patients complain of respiratory or nonspecific symptoms; this condition is called long COVID. Even patients with mild COVID-19 can experience long COVID, thus the burden of long COVID remains considerable. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively analyze the effects of long COVID using multi-faceted assessments.
Materials and Methods:
We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 2020 and September 2021 in six tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after discharge. Long COVID was defined as the persistence of three or more COVID-19-related symptoms. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of long COVID after the period of COVID-19.
Results:
During the study period, 290 patients were enrolled. Among them, 54.5 and 34.6% experienced long COVID within 6 months and after more than 18 months, respectively. Several patients showed abnormal results when tested for post-traumatic stress disorder (17.4%) and anxiety (31.9%) after 18 months. In patients who underwent follow-up chest computed tomography 18 months after COVID-19, abnormal findings remained at 51.9%. Males (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.53; P=0.004) and elderly (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09; P=0.04) showed a significant association with long COVID after 12–18 months in a multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Conclusion
Many patients still showed long COVID after 18 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection. When managing these patients, the assessment of multiple aspects is necessary.
2.Characteristics and Prevalence of Sequelae after COVID-19: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Se Ju LEE ; Yae Jee BAEK ; Su Hwan LEE ; Jung Ho KIM ; Jin Young AHN ; Jooyun KIM ; Ji Hoon JEON ; Hyeri SEOK ; Won Suk CHOI ; Dae Won PARK ; Yunsang CHOI ; Kyoung-Ho SONG ; Eu Suk KIM ; Hong Bin KIM ; Jae-Hoon KO ; Kyong Ran PECK ; Jae-Phil CHOI ; Jun Hyoung KIM ; Hee-Sung KIM ; Hye Won JEONG ; Jun Yong CHOI
Infection and Chemotherapy 2025;57(1):72-80
Background:
The World Health Organization has declared the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency. However, this did not indicate the end of COVID-19. Several months after the infection, numerous patients complain of respiratory or nonspecific symptoms; this condition is called long COVID. Even patients with mild COVID-19 can experience long COVID, thus the burden of long COVID remains considerable. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively analyze the effects of long COVID using multi-faceted assessments.
Materials and Methods:
We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 2020 and September 2021 in six tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after discharge. Long COVID was defined as the persistence of three or more COVID-19-related symptoms. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of long COVID after the period of COVID-19.
Results:
During the study period, 290 patients were enrolled. Among them, 54.5 and 34.6% experienced long COVID within 6 months and after more than 18 months, respectively. Several patients showed abnormal results when tested for post-traumatic stress disorder (17.4%) and anxiety (31.9%) after 18 months. In patients who underwent follow-up chest computed tomography 18 months after COVID-19, abnormal findings remained at 51.9%. Males (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.53; P=0.004) and elderly (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09; P=0.04) showed a significant association with long COVID after 12–18 months in a multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Conclusion
Many patients still showed long COVID after 18 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection. When managing these patients, the assessment of multiple aspects is necessary.
3.Characteristics and Prevalence of Sequelae after COVID-19: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Se Ju LEE ; Yae Jee BAEK ; Su Hwan LEE ; Jung Ho KIM ; Jin Young AHN ; Jooyun KIM ; Ji Hoon JEON ; Hyeri SEOK ; Won Suk CHOI ; Dae Won PARK ; Yunsang CHOI ; Kyoung-Ho SONG ; Eu Suk KIM ; Hong Bin KIM ; Jae-Hoon KO ; Kyong Ran PECK ; Jae-Phil CHOI ; Jun Hyoung KIM ; Hee-Sung KIM ; Hye Won JEONG ; Jun Yong CHOI
Infection and Chemotherapy 2025;57(1):72-80
Background:
The World Health Organization has declared the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency. However, this did not indicate the end of COVID-19. Several months after the infection, numerous patients complain of respiratory or nonspecific symptoms; this condition is called long COVID. Even patients with mild COVID-19 can experience long COVID, thus the burden of long COVID remains considerable. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively analyze the effects of long COVID using multi-faceted assessments.
Materials and Methods:
We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 2020 and September 2021 in six tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after discharge. Long COVID was defined as the persistence of three or more COVID-19-related symptoms. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of long COVID after the period of COVID-19.
Results:
During the study period, 290 patients were enrolled. Among them, 54.5 and 34.6% experienced long COVID within 6 months and after more than 18 months, respectively. Several patients showed abnormal results when tested for post-traumatic stress disorder (17.4%) and anxiety (31.9%) after 18 months. In patients who underwent follow-up chest computed tomography 18 months after COVID-19, abnormal findings remained at 51.9%. Males (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.53; P=0.004) and elderly (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09; P=0.04) showed a significant association with long COVID after 12–18 months in a multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Conclusion
Many patients still showed long COVID after 18 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection. When managing these patients, the assessment of multiple aspects is necessary.
4.Corrigendum: Correction of Funding in the Article “List of occupational diseases among farmers in Korea: a literature review”
Hansoo SONG ; Seok-Ju YOO ; Won-Ju PARK ; Seunghyeon CHO ; Ki Soo PARK ; Joo Hyun SUNG ; Sang Jin PARK ; Seong-yong YOON ; Kyeongsoo KIM ; Dong-phil CHOI ; Hye-min KIM ; Bounggyun JU ; Kanwoo YOUN
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2025;37(1):e16-
5.List of occupational diseases among farmers in Korea: a literature review
Hansoo SONG ; Seok-Ju YOO ; Won-Ju PARK ; Seunghyeon CHO ; Ki Soo PARK ; Joo Hyun SUNG ; Sang Jin PARK ; Seong-yong YOON ; Kyeongsoo KIM ; Dong-phil CHOI ; Hye-min KIM ; Bounggyun JU ; Kanwoo YOUN
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2025;37(1):e2-
A comprehensive list of occupational diseases among farmers is crucial for both compensation and prevention efforts. In Korea, most farmers are self-employed, and some occupational diseases are compensated through farmer safety insurance. However, it is not harmonized with industrial accident compensation insurance and does not adequately reflect the true burden of occupational diseases among farmers. To address this gap, the authors compiled a list of occupational diseases tailored to Korean farmers by reviewing the International Labor Organization’s list of occupational diseases, the Korean Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance List, the occupational disease lists of other countries, and relevant literature on farmers’ work-related diseases.
6.Does the Drain Can Prevent Hematoma After Thyroidectomy?
Sang Min LEE ; Min Seok KIM ; Seung Hoon WOO ; Sang Joon LEE ; Phil-Sang CHUNG
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(12):614-620
Background and Objectives:
Post-thyroidectomy hematoma is reported in about 0.7%- 2.1% of patients who underwent thyroidectomy. A drain is frequently placed after surgery to prevent swelling and hematoma. This study aims to compare clinical differences and postoperative complications depending on the presence or absence of a drain, and to identify the factors affecting hematoma after thyroidectomy.Subjects and Method This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy from March 2019 to Jun 2023. We examined patient’s age, gender, underlying diseases, use of antithrombotic drug, surgery type, thyroid volume, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications (hematoma and vocal cord palsy) by examining medical records.
Results:
Of 587 patients enrolled in the study, the drain was placed in 369 (62.9%) patients, and not in 218 (37.1%) patients. The mean age, incidence of hypertension and Grave’s disease comorbidity, antithrombotic drug use, number of patients who underwent neck dissection, thyroid volume, operating time, and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the drain placed group (p<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the ratio of vocal cord palsy and hematoma occurrence between the two groups. In logistic regression analysis, diabetes, the use of antithrombotic drugs, neck dissection, and larger thyroid volume were identified as risk factors for the occurrence of hematoma (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Surgeons tended to place the drain in patients with high bleeding tendency after thyroidectomy, but there was no difference in the incidence of hematoma according to drain placement. Rather, patients’ length of hospital stay increased due to the placement of drain.
7.Does the Drain Can Prevent Hematoma After Thyroidectomy?
Sang Min LEE ; Min Seok KIM ; Seung Hoon WOO ; Sang Joon LEE ; Phil-Sang CHUNG
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(12):614-620
Background and Objectives:
Post-thyroidectomy hematoma is reported in about 0.7%- 2.1% of patients who underwent thyroidectomy. A drain is frequently placed after surgery to prevent swelling and hematoma. This study aims to compare clinical differences and postoperative complications depending on the presence or absence of a drain, and to identify the factors affecting hematoma after thyroidectomy.Subjects and Method This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy from March 2019 to Jun 2023. We examined patient’s age, gender, underlying diseases, use of antithrombotic drug, surgery type, thyroid volume, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications (hematoma and vocal cord palsy) by examining medical records.
Results:
Of 587 patients enrolled in the study, the drain was placed in 369 (62.9%) patients, and not in 218 (37.1%) patients. The mean age, incidence of hypertension and Grave’s disease comorbidity, antithrombotic drug use, number of patients who underwent neck dissection, thyroid volume, operating time, and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the drain placed group (p<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the ratio of vocal cord palsy and hematoma occurrence between the two groups. In logistic regression analysis, diabetes, the use of antithrombotic drugs, neck dissection, and larger thyroid volume were identified as risk factors for the occurrence of hematoma (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Surgeons tended to place the drain in patients with high bleeding tendency after thyroidectomy, but there was no difference in the incidence of hematoma according to drain placement. Rather, patients’ length of hospital stay increased due to the placement of drain.
8.Does the Drain Can Prevent Hematoma After Thyroidectomy?
Sang Min LEE ; Min Seok KIM ; Seung Hoon WOO ; Sang Joon LEE ; Phil-Sang CHUNG
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(12):614-620
Background and Objectives:
Post-thyroidectomy hematoma is reported in about 0.7%- 2.1% of patients who underwent thyroidectomy. A drain is frequently placed after surgery to prevent swelling and hematoma. This study aims to compare clinical differences and postoperative complications depending on the presence or absence of a drain, and to identify the factors affecting hematoma after thyroidectomy.Subjects and Method This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy from March 2019 to Jun 2023. We examined patient’s age, gender, underlying diseases, use of antithrombotic drug, surgery type, thyroid volume, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications (hematoma and vocal cord palsy) by examining medical records.
Results:
Of 587 patients enrolled in the study, the drain was placed in 369 (62.9%) patients, and not in 218 (37.1%) patients. The mean age, incidence of hypertension and Grave’s disease comorbidity, antithrombotic drug use, number of patients who underwent neck dissection, thyroid volume, operating time, and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the drain placed group (p<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the ratio of vocal cord palsy and hematoma occurrence between the two groups. In logistic regression analysis, diabetes, the use of antithrombotic drugs, neck dissection, and larger thyroid volume were identified as risk factors for the occurrence of hematoma (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Surgeons tended to place the drain in patients with high bleeding tendency after thyroidectomy, but there was no difference in the incidence of hematoma according to drain placement. Rather, patients’ length of hospital stay increased due to the placement of drain.
9.Does the Drain Can Prevent Hematoma After Thyroidectomy?
Sang Min LEE ; Min Seok KIM ; Seung Hoon WOO ; Sang Joon LEE ; Phil-Sang CHUNG
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(12):614-620
Background and Objectives:
Post-thyroidectomy hematoma is reported in about 0.7%- 2.1% of patients who underwent thyroidectomy. A drain is frequently placed after surgery to prevent swelling and hematoma. This study aims to compare clinical differences and postoperative complications depending on the presence or absence of a drain, and to identify the factors affecting hematoma after thyroidectomy.Subjects and Method This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy from March 2019 to Jun 2023. We examined patient’s age, gender, underlying diseases, use of antithrombotic drug, surgery type, thyroid volume, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications (hematoma and vocal cord palsy) by examining medical records.
Results:
Of 587 patients enrolled in the study, the drain was placed in 369 (62.9%) patients, and not in 218 (37.1%) patients. The mean age, incidence of hypertension and Grave’s disease comorbidity, antithrombotic drug use, number of patients who underwent neck dissection, thyroid volume, operating time, and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the drain placed group (p<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the ratio of vocal cord palsy and hematoma occurrence between the two groups. In logistic regression analysis, diabetes, the use of antithrombotic drugs, neck dissection, and larger thyroid volume were identified as risk factors for the occurrence of hematoma (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Surgeons tended to place the drain in patients with high bleeding tendency after thyroidectomy, but there was no difference in the incidence of hematoma according to drain placement. Rather, patients’ length of hospital stay increased due to the placement of drain.
10.Does the Drain Can Prevent Hematoma After Thyroidectomy?
Sang Min LEE ; Min Seok KIM ; Seung Hoon WOO ; Sang Joon LEE ; Phil-Sang CHUNG
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(12):614-620
Background and Objectives:
Post-thyroidectomy hematoma is reported in about 0.7%- 2.1% of patients who underwent thyroidectomy. A drain is frequently placed after surgery to prevent swelling and hematoma. This study aims to compare clinical differences and postoperative complications depending on the presence or absence of a drain, and to identify the factors affecting hematoma after thyroidectomy.Subjects and Method This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy from March 2019 to Jun 2023. We examined patient’s age, gender, underlying diseases, use of antithrombotic drug, surgery type, thyroid volume, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications (hematoma and vocal cord palsy) by examining medical records.
Results:
Of 587 patients enrolled in the study, the drain was placed in 369 (62.9%) patients, and not in 218 (37.1%) patients. The mean age, incidence of hypertension and Grave’s disease comorbidity, antithrombotic drug use, number of patients who underwent neck dissection, thyroid volume, operating time, and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the drain placed group (p<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the ratio of vocal cord palsy and hematoma occurrence between the two groups. In logistic regression analysis, diabetes, the use of antithrombotic drugs, neck dissection, and larger thyroid volume were identified as risk factors for the occurrence of hematoma (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Surgeons tended to place the drain in patients with high bleeding tendency after thyroidectomy, but there was no difference in the incidence of hematoma according to drain placement. Rather, patients’ length of hospital stay increased due to the placement of drain.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail