1.Trend of blood lactate level in acute aluminum phosphide poisoning
Erfantalab PEYMAN ; Soltaninejad KAMBIZ ; Shadnia SHAHIN ; Zamani NASIM ; Hassanian-Moghaddam HOSSEIN ; Mahdavinejad AREZOU ; Damaneh Hashemi BEHROOZ
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2017;8(2):116-120
BACKGROUND:Aluminum phosphide (AlP) poisoning is common in the developing countries. There is no specific antidote for the treatment of acute AlP poisoning. Early diagnosis of poisoning and outcome predictors may facilitate treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to determine the trend of blood lactate level in acute AlP poisoning to evaluate its role as a prognostic factor. METHODS:This was a prospective study on acute AlP intoxicated patients during one year. Demographic data, clinical and laboratory data on admission, and outcome were recorded in a self-made questionnaire. Blood lactate levels were analyzed every two hours for 24 hours. RESULTS:Thirty-nine (27 male, 12 female) patients were included in the study. The mortality rate was 38.5%. The mean blood pressure, pulse rate, blood pH and serum bicarbonate level were significantly different between the survivors and non-survivors groups. Blood lactate level was significantly higher in the non-survivors group during 8 to 16 hours post ingestion. CONCLUSION:Blood lactate level could be used as an index of severity of acute AlP poisoning.
2.Speech Intelligibility in Persian Hearing Impaired Children with Cochlear Implants and Hearing Aids.
Mohammad REZAEI ; Maryam EMADI ; Peyman ZAMANI ; Farhad FARAHANI ; Gohar LOTFI
Journal of Audiology & Otology 2017;21(1):57-60
The aim of present study is to evaluate and compare speech intelligibility in hearing impaired children with cochlear implants (CI) and hearing aid (HA) users and children with normal hearing (NH). The sample consisted of 45 Persian-speaking children aged 3 to 5-years-old. They were divided into three groups, and each group had 15, children, children with CI and children using hearing aids in Hamadan. Participants was evaluated by the test of speech intelligibility level. Results of ANOVA on speech intelligibility test showed that NH children had significantly better reading performance than hearing impaired children with CI and HA. Post-hoc analysis, using Scheffe test, indicated that the mean score of speech intelligibility of normal children was higher than the HA and CI groups; but the difference was not significant between mean of speech intelligibility in children with hearing loss that use cochlear implant and those using HA. It is clear that even with remarkabkle advances in HA technology, many hearing impaired children continue to find speech production a challenging problem. Given that speech intelligibility is a key element in proper communication and social interaction, consequently, educational and rehabilitation programs are essential to improve speech intelligibility of children with hearing loss.
Child*
;
Cochlear Implants*
;
Hearing Aids*
;
Hearing Loss
;
Hearing*
;
Humans
;
Interpersonal Relations
;
Rehabilitation
;
Speech Intelligibility*
3.Spoken and Written Narrative in Persian-Speaking Students Who Received Cochlear Implant and/or Hearing Aid.
Peyman ZAMANI ; Zahra SOLEYMANI ; Vahid RASHEDI ; Farhad FARAHANI ; Gohar LOTFI ; Mohammad REZAEI
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2018;11(4):250-258
OBJECTIVES: To compare narrative skills between fourth and fifth grades of Persian-speaking students with hearing impairments and typical hearing students of the same grade and also to evaluate the effects of group, sex, hearing age, and educational grade of the students on their spoken/written narrative performance. METHODS: The subjects were 174 students aged 10–13 years, 54 of whom wore cochlear implants, 60 suffered from moderate to severe hearing losses and wore hearing aids, with the remaining 60 students being typical hearing in terms of the sense of hearing. The micro- and macrostructure components of spoken and written narrative were elicited from a pictorial story (The Playful Little Elephant) and then scored by raters. RESULTS: Compared to the typical hearing, the students with hearing impairments had significantly lower scores in all of the microstructure components of narratives. However, the findings showed no significant difference among different groups in macrostructure components of narratives. It was also revealed that the students had equal performance in spoken and written narrative. Finally, factor analysis manifested that group, sex, hearing age, and educational level of children might alter the outcome measures in various interactions. CONCLUSION: Although cochlear implantation was more effective than hearing aid on spoken and written narrative skills, the Persian-speaking students with hearing impairments were seen to need additional trainings on microstructure components of spoken/written narrative.
Child
;
Cochlear Implantation
;
Cochlear Implants*
;
Hearing Aids*
;
Hearing Loss
;
Hearing*
;
Humans
;
Narration
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)