BACKGROUND: Barium swallow is performed following esophagectomy to evaluate the anastomosis for detection of leaks and to assess the emptying of the gastric conduit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the barium swallow study in diagnosing anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent esophagectomy from January 2000 to December 2013 at our institution were investigated. Barium swallow was routinely done between days 5-7 to detect a leak. These results were compared to clinically determined leaks (defined by neck wound infection requiring jejunal feeds and or parenteral nutrition) during the postoperative period. The sensitivity and specificity of barium swallow in diagnosing clinically significant anastomotic leaks was determined. RESULTS: A total of 395 esophagectomies were performed (mean age, 62.2 years). The indications for the esophagectomy were as follows: malignancy (n=320), high-grade dysplasia (n=14), perforation (n=27), benign stricture (n=7), achalasia (n=16), and other (n=11). A variety of techniques were used including transhiatal (n=351), McKeown (n=35), and Ivor Lewis (n=9) esophagectomies. Operative mortality was 2.8% (n=11). Three hundred and sixty-eight patients (93%) underwent barium swallow study after esophagectomy. Clinically significant anastomotic leak was identified in 36 patients (9.8%). Barium swallow was able to detect only 13/36 clinically significant leaks. The sensitivity of the swallow in diagnosing a leak was 36% and specificity was 97%. The positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow study in detecting leaks were 59% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Barium swallow is an insensitive but specific test for detecting leaks at the cervical anastomotic site after esophagectomy.
Anastomotic Leak* ; Barium* ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Esophageal Achalasia ; Esophagectomy* ; Esophagus ; Humans ; Mortality ; Neck ; Postoperative Period ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Wound Infection

The relationship between infections and stroke has not been fully characterized, probably delaying the development of specific treatments. This narrative review addresses mechanisms of stroke linked to infections, including hypercoagulability, endothelial dysfunction, vasculitis, and impaired thrombolysis. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, may promote the development of stroke, which may represent its most severe neurological complication. The development of specific therapies for infection-associated stroke remains a profound challenge. Perhaps the most important remaining issue is the distinction between infections that trigger a stroke versus infections that are truly incidental. This distinction likely requires the establishment of appropriate biomarkers, candidates of which are elevated levels of fibrin Ddimer and anticardiolipin/antiphospholipid antibodies. These candidate biomarkers might have potential use in identifying pathogenic infections preceding stroke, which is a precursor to establishing specific therapies for this syndrome.