To investigate the effect of the aroma therapy and music intervention on anxious and pain for the breast cancer patients in the perioperative period and the potential mechanisms.
 Methods: A total of 100 breast cancer patients who received surgical treatment in the comprehensive hospitals of Hunan province were recruited for this study. Patients were assigned randomly into a control group, an aroma therapy group, a music intervention group, and a joint-therapy group (n=25 per group). The patients in the control group received regular post-surgical nursery, while the patients from other groups received aroma therapy, music intervention, or both in addition to the regular nursery. The scale of anxiety and pain were measured. The measurements were carried at three time points, namely 30 min before the surgery (T1), 30 min after the recovery period of anesthesia (T2), and 4 hours after the removal of anesthesia tubing (T3). Repeated ANOVA was used to perform statistic analysis.
 Results: The scale of pain was significantly increased at the post-operation (T2, T3) compared to pre-surgery (T1). The therapeutic group showed significant decrease in pain at post-operation (T3) comparing with the control group (P<0.05). The scale of anxiety was the highest at pre-surgery (T1). During anaesthesia recovery, the anxiety of patients at post-operation T2 and T3 in the therapeutic groups significantly decreased compared with the control group (P<0.05).
 Conclusion: Both the aroma therapy and the music therapy can decrease the stress-responsive anxiety and pain for the breast cancer patients in the perioperative period.
Analysis of Variance ; Anxiety ; therapy ; Aromatherapy ; Breast Neoplasms ; nursing ; psychology ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Music Therapy ; Pain, Postoperative ; therapy ; Perioperative Period ; Preoperative Care ; Time Factors

Humans ; Monitoring, Intraoperative ; methods ; Perioperative Care ; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive ; nursing ; therapy

Decisions about stopping or continuing medications perioperatively should be based on withdrawal potential, the potential for disease progression if therapy is interrupted, and the potential for drug interactions with anesthesia. In general, most medications are tolerated well through surgery and do not interfere with anesthetic administration. Therefore, most drugs should be continued through the morning of surgery. However, some medications are known to influence surgical risk or surgical decisions (e.g., antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, some hormonal therapies, and herbal remedies), so it is important to obtain a complete medication list from the patient and to advise adjusting doses or discontinuing certain potentially complicating medications in advance of surgery. This article reviews general recommendations for perioperative management of a number of common medication classes.
Anesthesia* ; Anticoagulants ; Disease Progression ; Drug Interactions ; Humans ; Medication Therapy Management ; Perioperative Care ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; Preanesthetic Medication

INTRODUCTIONObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. Patients at risk of OSA as determined by pre-anaesthesia screening based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists checklist were divided into 2 groups for comparison: (i) those who proceeded to elective surgery under a risk management protocol without undergoing formal polysomnography preoperatively and; (ii) those who underwent polysomnography and any subsequent OSA treatment as required before elective surgery. We hypothesised that it is clinically safe and acceptable for patients identified on screening as OSA at-risk to proceed for elective surgery without delay for polysomnography, with no increase in postoperative complications if managed on a perioperative risk reduction protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODSA retrospective review of patients presenting to the preanaesthesia clinic over an 18-month period and identified to be OSA at-risk on screening checklist was conducted (n = 463). The incidence of postoperative complications for each category of OSA severity (mild-moderate and severe) in the 2 study groups was compared.

RESULTSThere was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of cardiac (3.3% vs 2.3%), respiratory (14.3% vs 12.5%), and neurologic complications (0.6% vs 0%) between the screening-only and polysomnography-confirmed OSA groups respectively (P >0.05). There was good agreement of the OSA risk that is identified by screening checklist with OSA severity as determined on formal polysomnography (kappa coefficient = 0.953).

CONCLUSIONPreviously undiagnosed OSA is common in the presurgical population. In our study, there was no significant increase in postoperative complications in patients managed on the OSA risk management protocol. With this protocol, it is clinically safe to proceed with elective surgery without delay for formal polysomnography confirmation.

Adult ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Perioperative Care ; Polysomnography ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Preoperative Care ; Risk Reduction Behavior ; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive ; diagnosis

Adult ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Odontoid Process ; injuries ; Perioperative Nursing ; Postoperative Care ; Spinal Fractures ; surgery

Humans ; Monitoring, Intraoperative ; methods ; trends ; Perioperative Care ; methods ; trends

Humans ; Hypothermia ; Perioperative Care ; Intraoperative Complications ; Patients ; Body Temperature

Preoperative assessment and optimization of a patient's condition are important components of anesthesia practice. Improvements in evaluation and management can potentially reduce adverse events, improve patient and caregiver satisfaction, and reduce costs. Although routine preoperative laboratory tests are ordered in many institutions, history taking and physical examination provide more information about patients than laboratory tests do. Therefore, history taking and physical examination should be used to direct test ordering, and a test should be ordered only if the results will impact the decision to proceed with the planned procedure or alter the care plans. Preoperative laboratory tests without specific indications lack clinical usefulness and may actually lead to patient injury because of unnecessary interventions, delay of surgery, anxiety, and even inappropriate therapies. After sufficient discussion between anesthesiologists and surgeons in each institution, diagnostic testing guidelines for the preoperative evaluation should be developed to improve patient care, standardize clinical practice, improve efficiency, and reduce costs. For preoperative management for infants, preoperative evaluation is similar to that for the adult, but reducing anxiety of patients and their parents is especially important. Although many nonpharmacologic methods are used to reduce anxiety, the pharmacologic methods are more effective than nonparmacologic methods. The administration of sedative premedication to infants who are about to undergo anesthesia and surgery can result in beneficial effects during the preoperative and postoperative periods by decreasing anxiety, increasing cooperation during anesthesia induction, and reducing negative postoperative behavioral responses.
Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anxiety ; Caregivers ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Humans ; Infant* ; Parents ; Patient Care ; Physical Examination ; Postoperative Period ; Preanesthetic Medication ; Premedication ; Preoperative Care

OBJECTIVETo analyze the causes of perioperative complications of single-stage surgical management for spinal tuberculosis.

METHODSOne hundred and twenty patients with thoracic, lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis were treated by single-stage surgical management from January 1997 to January 2006 in our unit, including seventy-five males and forty-five females. The mean age was 34.5 (range 17 to 68) years old. The lesion ranged from T(6) to S(1). The anterior procedures of anterior debridement, interbody fusion and anterior fixation were carried out in sixty-five cases, posterior procedures in twenty-six cases, and combined anterior and posterior procedures in twenty-nine cases, respectively. The complications that occurred during surgical procedure and 1 month after operation were recorded. Underlying causes were analysed.

RESULTSThere were 10 cases (8.3%) were recorded of mild to severe complications during perioperative period in 120 patients. The complications and underlying causes were as follows: (1) A patient died from liver failure and blood coagulation dysfunction after operation due to inappropriate surgical timing (n = 1), in which case the patient with lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis also suffered from alcoholic liver sclerosis and dysfunction. (2) False diabetes insipidus (n = 1) and deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs (n = 1) occurred as result of surgical trauma. (3) Tear of iliac vein (n = 1) occurred with lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis because of unclear anatomical relationships when anterior debridement was performed. Injury of lumbar nerve roots (n = 3) and hemothorax (n = 1) also occurred due to mispractice of surgical procedures. (4) Paralysis intestinal obstruction and hypokalemia (n = 2) occurred after anterior procedures for lumbar spinal tuberculosis as a result of other reasons.

CONCLUSIONSImproper perioperative care will lead to complications of single-stage surgical procedures for spinal tuberculosis. Emphasis should be put on preoperative evaluation, surgical planning, and postoperative caring for prevention of complications.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Perioperative Care ; adverse effects ; methods ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies ; Tuberculosis, Spinal ; surgery

PURPOSE: This study was aimed at identifying the types of perceptions of ethical issues among perioperative nurses. METHODS: Q-methodology focusing on individual subjectivity was used with data collected in November 2016. Thirty-four Q-statements were selected and scored by the 35 participants on a 9-point scale with normal distribution. Participants were perioperative nurses working in advanced general hospitals and general hospitals. The data were analyzed using the PC-QUANL program. RESULTS: total of 35 perioperative nurses were classified into 4 factors based on the following viewpoints: self-centered (type 1), onlooking and avoiding (type 2), patient-centered (type 3), and problem-centered (type 4). The 4 factors accounted for 57.84% of the total variance. Individual contributions of factors 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 41.80%, 7.18%, 5.20%, and 3.66%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The major contribution of this study is the clarification of perioperative nurses' subjective perceptions of ethical issues. These findings can be used in formulating effective strategies for nursing educators, professional nurses, and nursing administrators to improve ethical decision-making abilities and to perform ethical nursing care by the appropriate management of ethical issues in everyday nursing practice.
Administrative Personnel ; Ethics* ; Ethics, Nursing ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Nursing ; Nursing Care ; Perioperative Nursing ; Q-Sort