This article describes cases of applying non-surgical treatment including scaling and root planing, occlusal adjustment and tooth splinting of periodontally compromised lower anterior incisors Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed over a 1–3-year period. All clinical parameters and radiographic bone levels improved in both cases. Dramatic regeneration of alveolar bone and lamina dura were observed on radiographic images, and no specific complications occurred during the follow-up period. Within the limitations of this study, these cases demonstrated the possibility of tooth rescue through non-surgical treatment and splinting of periodontally compromised teeth typically considered for extraction.
Bone Regeneration ; Dental Occlusion, Traumatic ; Follow-Up Studies ; Incisor ; Occlusal Adjustment ; Periodontal Splints ; Regeneration ; Root Planing ; Splints ; Tooth

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study with 4–12 years of follow-up was to compare the marginal bone loss (MBL) between external-connection (EC) and internal-connection (IC) dental implants in posterior areas without periodontal or peri-implant disease on the adjacent teeth or implants. Additional factors influencing MBL were also evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed using dental records and radiographic data obtained from patients who had undergone dental implant treatment in the posterior area from March 2006 to March 2007. All the implants that were included had follow-up periods of more than 4 years after loading and satisfied the implant success criteria, without any peri-implant or periodontal disease on the adjacent implants or teeth. They were divided into 2 groups: EC and IC. Subgroup comparisons were conducted according to splinting and the use of cement in the restorations. A statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for comparisons between 2 groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparisons among more than 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 355 implants in 170 patients (206 EC and 149 IC) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this study. The mean MBL was 0.47 mm and 0.15 mm in the EC and IC implants, respectively, which was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Comparisons according to splinting (MBL of single implants: 0.34 mm, MBL of splinted implants: 0.31 mm, P=0.676) and cement use (MBL of cemented implants: 0.27 mm, MBL of non-cemented implants: 0.35 mm, P=0.178) showed no statistically significant differences in MBL, regardless of the implant connection type. CONCLUSIONS: IC implants showed a more favorable bone response regarding MBL in posterior areas without peri-implantitis or periodontal disease.
Alveolar Bone Loss ; Dental Implant-Abutment Design ; Dental Implants ; Dental Records ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Peri-Implantitis ; Periodontal Diseases ; Retrospective Studies ; Splints ; Tooth

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) position of the center of resistance of 4 mandibular anterior teeth, 6 mandibular anterior teeth, and the complete mandibular dentition by using 3D finite-element analysis. METHODS: Finite-element models included the complete mandibular dentition, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. The crowns of teeth in each group were fixed with buccal and lingual arch wires and lingual splint wires to minimize individual tooth movement and to evenly disperse the forces onto the teeth. Each group of teeth was subdivided into 0.5-mm intervals horizontally and vertically, and a force of 200 g was applied on each group. The center of resistance was defined as the point where the applied force induced parallel movement. RESULTS: The center of resistance of the 4 mandibular anterior teeth group was 13.0 mm apical and 6.0 mm posterior, that of the 6 mandibular anterior teeth group was 13.5 mm apical and 8.5 mm posterior, and that of the complete mandibular dentition group was 13.5 mm apical and 25.0 mm posterior to the incisal edge of the mandibular central incisors. CONCLUSIONS: Finite-element analysis was useful in determining the 3D position of the center of resistance of the 4 mandibular anterior teeth group, 6 mandibular anterior teeth group, and complete mandibular dentition group.
Crowns ; Dentition* ; Incisor ; Periodontal Ligament ; Splints ; Tooth ; Tooth Movement

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars, using data collected during from 2002 to 2015. METHODS: Traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was assessed by examining clinical parameters (bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, fremitus, and tooth mobility) and radiographic parameters (loss of supporting bone and widening of the periodontal ligament space) over a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical factors (gender, age, implant type, maxillary or mandibular position, opposing teeth, and duration of functional loading) were evaluated statistically in order to characterize the relationship between implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars. RESULTS: The study inclusion criteria were met by 283 patients, who had received 347 implants in the posterior region. The incidence of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was significantly higher for splinted implants (P=0.004), implants in the maxillary region (P<0.001), and when implants were present in the opposing teeth (P<0.001). The other clinical factors of gender, age, and duration of functional loading were not significantly associated with traumatic occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the risk of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars increased when splinted implants were placed in the maxillary molar region and when the teeth opposing an implant also contained implants.
Bicuspid* ; Dental Implants* ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Follow-Up Studies* ; Humans ; Incidence ; Molar ; Periodontal Ligament ; Retrospective Studies ; Splints ; Tooth ; Tooth Mobility

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical performance of glass fiber reinforced resin-bonded fixed partial denture(GFR-RBFPD) as a periodontal splint on abutment teeth with reduced periodontal support.

METHODSThirty fixed-fixed GFR-RBFPD were delivered to restore anterior partial edentulous dentitions. The adjacent abutment teeth had severely reduced periodontal support and were not indicated for full crown retained FPD. The success rate and functional survival rate had been recorded and the periodontal condition had been evaluated for 4 years. The results were statistically analyzed with single factor variance analysis and chi square test(α=0.05).

RESULTSIn the first, second, and third year following restoration, one connector fractured in each year and they were repaired with adhesive resin and the pontics were kept in place for function. In the third and fourth years after restoration, there was one pontic displacement with fracture of connectors. The total survive rate was 83%(25/30) and the functional survival rate was 93% (28/30) at the end of the fourth year. The main reason of failure was fracture of connector. About 22%(13/60) of the adjacent teeth showed marginal bone height decrease, while the other 78% (47/60) increased with statistic significant difference from one year after the restoration to the end of the observation term(P<0.05). The periodontal condition of the adjacent teeth was improved after the restoration.

CONCLUSIONSThe four years clinical evaluation indicates that the GFR-RBFPD may be used as fixed prostheses to replace lost one to three anterior teeth with reduced periodontal support of abutment teeth.

Composite Resins ; Dental Abutments ; Dental Restoration Failure ; statistics & numerical data ; Denture Design ; Denture Retention ; Denture, Partial, Fixed ; Denture, Partial, Fixed, Resin-Bonded ; Glass ; Humans ; Incisor ; Periodontal Splints ; Time Factors

When an implant-supported maxillary full-arch fixed prosthesis is planned for patients with the horizontal and vertical bone resorption induced by periodontal disease, it is necessary to consider the masticatory function, esthetics and phonetics when placing implants. For this reason, thorough clinical and radiological diagnosis is necessary. Extensive bone and soft tissue grafting may be required as well. Since there is no clear guideline for proper number of implants, segment or splinting of substructure and method of retaining prosthesis, these should be considered during diagnostic process. This clinical report describes a patient who has experienced several tooth extractions and periodontal treatment due to severe periodontitis on maxilla and mandible. With bone and soft tissue graft before dental implant placement, the patient have satisfactory result in esthetic and functional aspect with the implant-supported maxillary full-arch fixed prosthesis opposing mandibular natural dentition.
Bone Resorption ; Dental Implants ; Dentition* ; Diagnosis ; Esthetics ; Humans ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Periodontal Diseases ; Periodontitis ; Phonetics ; Prostheses and Implants* ; Splints ; Tissue Transplantation ; Tooth Extraction ; Transplants

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro. METHODS: Roots of human mandibular central incisors were covered with silicone, mimicking the periodontal ligament, and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. The specimens (N = 50), with two teeth each, were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10/group) according to the retainer materials: (1) Interlig (E-glass), (2) everStick Ortho (E-glass), (3) DentaPreg Splint (S2-glass), (4) Ribbond (polyethylene), and (5) Quad Cat wire (stainless steel). After the recommended adhesive procedures, the retainers were bonded to the teeth by using flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow). The teeth were subjected to 10,00,000 cyclic loads (8 Hz, 3 - 100 N, 45degrees angle, under 37 +/- 3degrees C water) at their incisoproximal contact, and debonding forces were measured with a universal testing machine (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Failure sites were examined under a stereomicroscope (x40 magnification). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: All the specimens survived the cyclic loading. Their mean debonding forces were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The DentaPreg Splint group (80%) showed the highest incidence of complete adhesive debonding, followed by the Interlig group (60%). The everStick Ortho group (80%) presented predominantly partial adhesive debonding. The Quad Cat wire group (50%) presented overlying composite detachment. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclic loading did not cause debonding. The retainers presented similar debonding forces but different failure types. Braided stainless steel wire retainers presented the most repairable failure type.
Adenine ; Adhesives ; Animals ; Carbamates ; Cats ; Collodion ; Composite Resins ; Deoxycytidine ; Drug Combinations ; Fatigue ; Humans ; Incidence ; Incisor ; Organophosphonates ; Periodontal Ligament ; Polyethylene ; Polyethylenes ; Polymethyl Methacrylate ; Quinolones ; Recurrence ; Retention (Psychology) ; Silicones ; Splints ; Stainless Steel ; Thiazoles ; Tooth ; Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination

Adult ; Aggressive Periodontitis ; complications ; drug therapy ; therapy ; Anti-Infective Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; complications ; drug therapy ; Dental Scaling ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Isoxazoles ; therapeutic use ; Methotrexate ; therapeutic use ; Metronidazole ; therapeutic use ; Periodontal Splints ; Root Canal Therapy ; Spiramycin ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the 3-dimensional position of the center of resistance of the 4 maxillary anterior teeth, 6 maxillary anterior teeth, and the full maxillary dentition using 3-dimensional finite element analysis. METHODS: Finite element models included the whole upper dentition, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. The crowns of the teeth in each group were fixed with buccal and lingual arch wires and lingual splint wires to minimize individual tooth movement and to evenly disperse the forces to the teeth. A force of 100 g or 200 g was applied to the wire beam extended from the incisal edge of the upper central incisor, and displacement of teeth was evaluated. The center of resistance was defined as the point where the applied force induced parallel movement. RESULTS: The results of study showed that the center of resistance of the 4 maxillary anterior teeth group, the 6 maxillary anterior teeth group, and the full maxillary dentition group were at 13.5 mm apical and 12.0 mm posterior, 13.5 mm apical and 14.0 mm posterior, and 11.0 mm apical and 26.5 mm posterior to the incisal edge of the upper central incisor, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is thought that the results from this finite element models will improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment.
Crowns ; Dentition ; Displacement (Psychology) ; Finite Element Analysis ; Incisor ; Periodontal Ligament ; Splints ; Tooth ; Tooth Movement

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in the center of resistance of the maxillary teeth in relation to alveolar bone loss. METHODS: A finite element model, which included the upper dentition and periodontal ligament, was designed according to the amount of bone loss (0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm). The teeth in each group were fixed with buccal and lingual arch wires and splint wires. Retraction and intrusion forces of 200 g for 4 and 6 anterior teeth groups and 400 g for the full dentition group were applied. RESULTS: The centers of resistance were at 13.5 mm, 14.5 mm, 15 mm apical and 12 mm, 12 mm, 12.5 mm posterior in the 4 incisor group; 13.5 mm, 14.5 mm, 15 mm apical and 14 mm, 14 mm, 14.5 mm posterior in the 6 anterior teeth group; and 11 mm, 13 mm, 14.5 mm apical and 26.5 mm, 27 mm, 25.5 mm posterior in the full dentition group respectively according to 0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: The center of resistance shifted apically and posteriorly as alveolar bone loss increased in 4 and 6 anterior teeth groups. However, in the full dentition group, the center of resistance shifted apically and anteriorly in the 4 mm bone loss model.
Alveolar Bone Loss ; Dentition ; Finite Element Analysis ; Incisor ; Periodontal Ligament ; Splints ; Tooth