1.Laser therapy in peri-implantitis treatment: literature review.
Kyung Joong LEE ; Jong Ho LEE ; Kee Yeon KUM ; Young Jun LIM
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science 2015;31(4):340-348
Peri-implantitis is the most common reason for a late failure and can occur even after years of successful osseointegration. The role of microbial plaque accumulation in the development of peri-implantitis has been well documented. On the other hand, the ideal method of implant surface decontamination to re-establish the health of peri-implant tissue remains to be determined. Removal of bacterial deposits is essential in the treatment of peri-implant infections, and various therapeutic approaches have been described in the literature, including mechanical debridement, disinfection with chemotherapeutic agents, and laser therapy. Recently, there has been a plenitude of scientific data regarding the use of laser irradiation to achieve titanium surface decontamination. Thus, research is focusing on lasers' potential use in the treatment of peri-implantitis. The aim of this literature review is to analyze and evaluate the efficacy of laser therapy for the treatment of peri-implantitis.
Debridement
;
Decontamination
;
Dental Implants
;
Disinfection
;
Hand
;
Laser Therapy*
;
Osseointegration
;
Peri-Implantitis*
;
Titanium
3.Role of decontamination treatment for implant surface in the treatment of peri-implantitis.
Chunyu ZENG ; Zhefu WANG ; Yunzhou CAI ; Ting ZENG ; Yanqing YANG ; Yuehong WANG
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2022;47(4):521-528
Peri-implantitis, characterized by inflammation of tissues around implants and gradual loss of supporting bone tissue, has become one of the main causes for implant failure. Thoroughly removing the plaque biofilm on the implant surface is the first principle in the treatment of peri-implantitis. For this reason, various decontamination methods have been proposed, which can be divided into 2 categories: Removing biofilm and killing microorganisms according to the effect of plaque biofilm on the implant surface. However, at present, there is no decontamination method that can completely remove the plaque biofilm on the implant surface, and it lacks of clinical recommended guidelines. To understand the advantages and disadvantages, effectiveness and safety for different implant surface decontamination methods is of great significance to guide the clinical selection for peri-implantitis treatment.
Bone and Bones
;
Decontamination
;
Dental Implants
;
Humans
;
Inflammation
;
Peri-Implantitis/therapy*
;
Prostheses and Implants
4.Efficacy of combined application of glycine powder air-polishing in non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases.
Fei SUN ; Si Qi LI ; Yi Ping WEI ; Jin Sheng ZHONG ; Cui WANG ; Wen Jie HU
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2022;54(1):119-125
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the clinical efficacy of combined application of glycine powder air-polishing and mechanical submucosal debridement in non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases.
METHODS:
A randomized controlled clinical study was carried out on patients diagnosed with peri-implant diseases in the Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, between May of 2020 and June of 2021.Twenty-eight patients with totally sixty-two implants were enrolled.The patients were randomly divided into the test group and control group. The patients in the test group (13 subjects/32 implants) received mechanical submucosal debridement using titanium curettes combined with application of glycine powder air-polishing, while the control group (15 subjects/30 implants) received mechanical submucosal debridement using titanium only. Clinical parameters, such as plaque index (PLI), pocket probing depth (PPD), bleeding index (BI) and the percentage of suppuration on probing on implants' level (SoP%) were measured at baseline and 8 weeks after non-surgical intervention. Changes and group differences of clinical parameters of the implants before and 8 weeks after non-surgical intervention were compared.
RESULTS:
Mean PLI, PPD, BI of both the test group and control group significantly reduced 8 weeks after non-surgical intervention (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the test group achieved lower BI (2.7±0.8 vs. 2.2±0.7, P < 0.05), more reduction of BI (0.6±0.7 vs. 1.1±0.6, P < 0.01) and more reduction of SoP% (21.9% vs. 10%, P < 0.05) after non-surgical intervention. Both the control and test groups exhibited comparable PLI and PPD reductions (P>0.05). For the implants diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis, the test group revealed more signi-ficant reduction in BI and SoP% than the control group (1.0±0.7 vs. 0.4±0.7, P=0.02; 6.3% vs. 0, P=0.012). There was no significant difference existing in PLI and PD improvement between the control group and test group (P>0.05). For the implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis, there was no significant difference existing in PLI, PPD, BI and SoP% improvement values between the test and control groups (P>0.05). No complications or discomforts were reported during the study.
CONCLUSION
Both treatment procedures could relieve the inflammation of peri-implant soft tissue. Non-surgical mechanical submucosal debridement combined application of glycine powder air-polishing is associated with significant reduction of soft tissue bleeding and suppuration on probing especially in the implants diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis.
Dental Implants
;
Glycine
;
Humans
;
Peri-Implantitis/therapy*
;
Periodontal Index
;
Periodontics
;
Powders
;
Treatment Outcome
5.Photobiomodulation and implants: implications for dentistry.
Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2013;43(6):262-268
The use of dental implants has become a mainstay of rehabilitative and restorative dentistry. With an impressive clinical success rate, there remain a few minor clinical issues with the use of implants such as peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. The use of laser technology with implants has a fascinating breadth of applications, beginning from their precision manufacturing to clinical uses for surgical site preparation, reducing pain and inflammation, and promoting osseointegration and tissue regeneration. This latter aspect is the focus of this review, which outlines various studies of implants and laser therapy in animal models. The use of low level light therapy or photobiomodulation has demonstrated its efficacy in these studies. Besides more research studies to understand its molecular mechanisms, significant efforts are needed to standardize the clinical dosing and delivery protocols for laser therapy to ensure the maximal efficacy and safety of this potent clinical tool for photobiomodulation.
Dental Implants
;
Dentistry*
;
Inflammation
;
Laser Therapy
;
Low-Level Light Therapy
;
Models, Animal
;
Mucositis
;
Osseointegration
;
Peri-Implantitis
;
Phototherapy
;
Regeneration
6.Risk management in clinical orthodontic treatment.
Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2012;47(3):144-147