BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the bare-metal stent era, routine follow-up coronary angiography (RFU CAG) was used to ensure stent patency. With the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) with better safety and efficacy profiles, RFU CAG has been performed less often. There are few data on the clinical impact of RFU CAG after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients with coronary artery disease; the aim of this study was to examine this issue. METHODS: We analyzed clinical outcomes retrospectively of 259 patients who were event-free at 12-month after stent implantation and did not undergo RFU CAG (clinical follow-up group) and 364 patients who were event-free prior to RFU CAG (angiographic follow-up group). Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimated total survival and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival did not differ between the groups (p = 0.100 and p = 0.461, respectively). The cumulative MACE rate was also not different between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 2.02). In the angiographic follow-up group, 8.8% revascularization was seen at RFU CAG. CONCLUSIONS: RFU CAG did not affect long-term clinical outcome after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients.
Aged ; *Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Coronary Artery Disease/radiography/*therapy ; Coronary Restenosis/etiology/radiography/surgery ; Coronary Vessels/*radiography ; Disease Progression ; Disease-Free Survival ; *Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction/etiology/radiography/surgery ; Patient Selection ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects/*instrumentation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prosthesis Design ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although drug-eluting stents (DESs) effectively reduce restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), they also delay re-endothelialization and impair microvascular function, resulting in adverse clinical outcomes. Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capturing stents, by providing a functional endothelial layer on the stent, have beneficial effects on microvascular function. However, data on coronary microvascular function in patients with EPC stents versus DESs are lacking. METHODS: Seventy-four patients who previously underwent PCI were enrolled in this study. Microvascular function was evaluated 6 months after PCI based on the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) and the coronary flow reserve (CFR). IMR was calculated as the ratio of the mean distal coronary pressure at maximal hyperemia to the inverse of the hyperemic mean transit time (hTmn). The CFR was calculated by dividing the hTmn by the baseline mean transit time. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (age, 67.2 +/- 9.6 years; male:female, 15:6) with an EPC stent and 53 patients (age, 61.5 +/- 14.7 years; male:female, 40:13) with second-generation DESs were included in the study. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the two groups. Angiography performed 6 months postoperatively did not show significant differences in their CFR values. However, patients with the EPC stent had a significantly lower IMR than patients with second-generation DESs (median, 25.5 [interquartile range, 12.85 to 28.18] vs. 29.0 [interquartile range, 15.42 to 39.23]; p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Microvascular dysfunction was significantly improved after 6 months in patients with EPC stents compared to those with DESs. The complete re-endothelialization achieved with the EPC stent may provide clinical benefits over DESs, especially in patients with microvascular dysfunction.
Aged ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis/physiopathology/*therapy ; *Coronary Circulation ; Coronary Vessels/*physiopathology/radiography ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; *Endothelial Progenitor Cells/radiography ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Microvessels/*physiopathology/radiography ; Middle Aged ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/*instrumentation ; Prosthesis Design ; *Re-Epithelialization ; *Stents ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Resistance

No abstract available.
Coronary Artery Disease/*therapy ; *Coronary Circulation ; Coronary Vessels/*physiopathology ; *Endothelial Progenitor Cells ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Microvessels/*physiopathology ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/*instrumentation ; *Re-Epithelialization ; *Stents

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; instrumentation

No abstract available.
Aged ; Angina Pectoris/diagnosis/etiology ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease/*complications/diagnosis/therapy ; Coronary Stenosis/*complications/diagnosis/therapy ; Coronary Vessel Anomalies/*complications/diagnosis ; Humans ; Male ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: While drug-eluting stents (DESs) have shown favorable outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared to bare metal stents (BMSs), there are concerns about the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) with DESs. Because intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance may help optimize stent placement and improve outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients, we evaluated the impact of IVUS-guided BMS versus DES implantation on long-term outcomes in primary PCI. METHODS: In all, 239 STEMI patients received DES (n = 172) or BMS (n = 67) under IVUS guidance in primary PCI. The 3-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and ST was evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference in all cause mortality or MI. However, the incidence of TVR was 23.9% with BMS versus 9.3% with DES (p = 0.005). Thus, the number of MACEs was significantly lower with DES (11.0% vs. 29.9%; p = 0.001). The incidence of definite or probable ST was not different (1.5% vs. 2.3%; p = 1.0). IVUS-guided DES implantation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.78; p = 0.017), stent length (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.06; p = 0.046), and multivessel disease (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.11 to 8.15; p = 0.030) were independent predictors of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with primary PCI under IVUS guidance, the use of DES reduced the incidence of 3-year TVR versus BMS. However, all cause mortality and MI were similar between the groups. The incidence of ST was low in both groups.
Aged ; Drug-Eluting Stents/*statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction/mortality/*surgery ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/*instrumentation/statistics & numerical data ; Reoperation/statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; *Ultrasonography, Interventional

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Combination single-pill therapy can improve cost-effectiveness in a typical medical therapy. However, there is a little evidence about the efficacy and tolerability of combination single-pill antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS: From June to November 2012, in total, 142 patients who met the following criteria were enrolled: at least 18 years old; successful PCI with DES at least 3 months earlier; and regular medication of aspirin and clopidogrel with no side effects. After VerifyNow P2Y12 and aspirin assays, the combination single pill of aspirin and clopidogrel was given and laboratory tests were repeated 6 weeks later. RESULTS: At baseline, the incidence of aspirin resistance, defined as aspirin reaction unit (ARU) > or = 550, was 9.2%, that of clopidogrel resistance, defined as P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) > or = 230, was 46.5%, and that of percent inhibition of PRU < 20% was 32.4%. At follow-up, the incidence of resistance by ARU value was 7.0%, 50.0% by PRU value, and 35.9% by percentage inhibition of PRU, respectively. The mean values of ARU (431.5 +/- 63.6 vs. 439.8 +/- 55.2; p = 0.216) and PRU (227.5 +/- 71.4 vs. 223.3 +/- 76.0; p = 0.350) were not significantly different before versus after antiplatelet-combination single-pill therapy. Five adverse events (3.5%) were observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Combination single-pill antiplatelet therapy, which may reduce daily pill burden for patients after PCI with DES, demonstrated similar efficacy to separate dual-pill antiplatelet therapy.
Aged ; Antiplatyhelmintic Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Aspirin/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Drug Combinations ; Drug Resistance ; *Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Intention to Treat Analysis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Ischemia/blood/diagnosis/*therapy ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects/*instrumentation ; Platelet Function Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Tablets ; Ticlopidine/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

No abstract available.
Aged ; Cardiovascular Agents/*administration & dosage ; Drug-Eluting Stents/*adverse effects ; *Femoral Artery/radiography/ultrasonography ; Foreign-Body Migration/diagnosis/*etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/*adverse effects/instrumentation ; Prosthesis Design ; Sirolimus/*administration & dosage ; Ultrasonography, Interventional

No abstract available.
Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic/*chemically induced/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Biopsy ; Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis/drug therapy/*etiology ; Drug-Eluting Stents/*adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/*adverse effects/instrumentation ; Sirolimus/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives ; Steroids/therapeutic use ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome

No abstract available.
Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/*complications/diagnosis/surgery ; Adrenalectomy ; Adrenocortical Adenoma/*complications/diagnosis/surgery ; Adult ; Biopsy ; Coronary Angiography ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Humans ; Hyperaldosteronism/diagnosis/*etiology ; Male ; Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis/*etiology/therapy ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome