OBJECTIVETo evaluate the scapular free flap for penile reconstruction.

METHODSSix patients with penile loss were reconstructed by transferring a scapular free flap with implanting a Malleable penile prosthesis.

RESULTSAll of the flaps survived completely. With the follow-ups from six to twelve months, the reconstructed penile had excellent configuration and good function.

CONCLUSIONThe above mentioned technique could be a good method for penile reconstruction.

Follow-Up Studies ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation ; methods ; Penile Prosthesis ; Penis ; surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Scapula

A circumcising incision to deglove the penis for penile prosthesis (PP) implantation can increase the risk of ischemic injury to the glans penis. In order to avoid vascular complications, we describe a novel technique utilizing a ventral incision to perform the PP implantation and a double-dorsal patch graft, or “sliding technique” (ST), in patients with severe Peyronie's disease (PD). Three patients with severe PD and erectile dysfunction at our institution underwent ST and PP implantation through a ventral incision. This new approach was not only successful in facilitating the ST and PP implantation in these patients but also allowed for adequate exposure of the penile shaft with no reported loss of sensation. We also conducted a review of current literature regarding the approaches for PD. While ischemic complications of PP implantation and ST are rare, there are reports of ischemic injury in patients undergoing a circumcising incision. The combination of a circumcising incision and a patient's underlying peripheral artery disease potentially raises a patient's risk of this rare complication. Our innovative ventral incision provides an alternative method for PP implantation and ST in order to avoid ischemia of the penis, while still allowing for adequate exposure.
Adult ; Aged ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Penile Implantation/methods* ; Penile Induration/surgery* ; Penile Prosthesis ; Penis/surgery* ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control* ; Skin Transplantation/methods*

Penile implant usage dates to the 16th century yet penile implants to treat erectile dysfunction did not occur until nearly four centuries later. The modern era of penile implants has progressed rapidly over the past 50 years as physicians' knowledge of effective materials for penile prostheses and surgical techniques has improved. Herein, we describe the history of penile prosthetics and the constant quest to improve the technology. Elements of the design from the first inflatable penile prosthesis by Scott and colleagues and the Small-Carrion malleable penile prosthesis are still found in present iterations of these devices. While there have been significant improvements in penile prosthesis design, the promise of an ideal prosthetic device remains elusive. As other erectile dysfunction therapies emerge, penile prostheses will have to continue to demonstrate a competitive advantage. A particular strength of penile prostheses is their efficacy regardless of etiology, thus allowing treatment of even the most refractory cases.
Biomedical Technology ; Erectile Dysfunction/*surgery/*therapy ; Forecasting ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation/*methods ; Penile Prosthesis/*trends ; Penis/*surgery

AIMTo present a simple technique during penile prosthesis implantation that promotes the perception of increased phallic length.

METHODSThe penoscrotal web is defined. A "check mark" incision is made with excision of scrotal tissue. Excellent exposure is provided for implantation of the cylinders, pump and reservoir. Wound closure is performed longitudinally.

RESULTSThis technique is a modified extension of surgeries described in the pediatric literature for webbed penis. Loss of penile length following penile implantation surgery is worrisome for patients suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED). This technique helps with patient satisfaction, cosmetic results, and improves perception of penile length.

CONCLUSIONVentral phalloplasty is a safe, technically simple procedure that may be performed in concert with penile prosthesis implantation or as a stand alone procedure under certain circumstances.

Erectile Dysfunction ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; Penis ; pathology ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effects of surgery treatment on serious penile lesions and malformation.

METHODSSixty-two patients, aged from 19 to 63 years old (mean 35 ys), were included in the study. Among them, 4 patients suffered from penis partial defection were respectively treated with restoring defective penis, penis lengthening and urethroplasty; three patients with penis completely missing were treated with penis reconstruction surgery; 22 cases with serious penile curvature were treated with the 16-dot plication technique (Lue's procedure); 15 cases with penile fracture were treated with conservative treatment for 1 case and with patch penis, corpus spongiosum, and deep penile dorsal vein ligation for 14 cases; 5 cases with post-operative complications of 3-pieces of penile prosthesis, including the prosthesis perforating to the urethra, water pump failure, broken connection tube, erection angle < 60 degrees and failure to expansion the corpus cavernosum, were treated by taking out prostheses, urethral repair cracks, replacement of the prostheses, excision of fibrosis scar and re-implantation prostheses respectively. Four cases with penis complete amputation were treated with the penis replantation; three cases of avulsion injury were treated with the replantation and free flap skin; 6 with Paget's disease of penises were treated with the lesion free skin buried in the scrotum and penis.

RESULTSAll these patients were followed up for 3 months to 4 years, with the average of 9 months. Among the 4 cases of penis partial defection, 2 patients were satisfied with the penile appearance and sexual function; 1 got some satisfactory and 1 was unsatisfied. Three cases with the loss of the penis completely were satisfied with both the postoperative appearance and urination, and 1 was not satisfied. Twenty-two cases of penile curvature deformities were corrected, and one case was recurrence. Fourteen of the 15 patients with penile fracture were followed, and all got the restoration of sexual function. Among them, 5 cases with post-operative complications, including mild bending, algopareunia, subcutaneous induration, poor hardness and poor sexual pleasure, were not further treated, and another case lost; Five cases with post-operative complications of three-pieces penile prosthesis were treated successfully, and 4 of their spouses were satisfied with their sexual function after operation, only 1 of their spouse not satisfied. Among four cases with complete amputation of penis, two cases of penis were replanted successfully while two necrosis. Three cases with avulsion were treated with skin grafting successfully. All 6 cases with penile Paget's disease were followed for 2 -4 years, and free skin grafts were all survival. One patient died of brain metastases 18 months after operation and five cases were disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONThe patients should be treated based on the procedure of andrological and urological surgery, together with microsurgical, flap or skin graft technique. The urologist should design personalized surgical procedure. Most of the patient's penis shape and erectile dysfunction can be reconstructed by our procedures, but some patients can not achieve the desired appearance or function of penis. New approaches of the treatment ought to be developed to restore both of the shape and function for those severe injury of the penis.

Adult ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Penile Implantation ; Penile Prosthesis ; Penis ; injuries ; surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Surgical Flaps ; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male ; methods ; Young Adult

AIMTo discuss important points on medical history, preoperative evaluation, real expectations, and selection of the appropriate surgical procedure to improve patient satisfaction after surgical procedures for Peyronie's disease.

METHODSRecent advances in approaches to Peyronie's disease are discussed based on the literature and personal experiences. Issues concerning surgical indication, patient selection, surgical techniques, and grafting are discussed. Lengthening procedures on the convex side of the penile curvature by means of grafting offer the best possible gain from a reconstruction standpoint. Penile rectification and rigidity are required to achieve a completely functional penis. Most patients experience associated erectile dysfunction (ED), and penile straightening alone may not be enough to restore complete function. Twenty-five patients were submitted to total penile reconstruction on length and girth with concomitant penile prosthesis implant. The maximum length restoration was possible and limited by the length of the dissected neurovascular bundle. The mean age was 55.4 years (32-69 years) and the mean angle of curvature 74.2+/-22.4 degree (0-100 degree). Pericardial grafting was used to cover the defect. The mean follow-up time was 11.2 +/- 5.9 months (3-22 months).

RESULTSMean functional penile length gain was 3.40+/-0.73 cm (2-5 cm). Penile prosthesis maintained the penis straight. No infections occurred. Sexual intercourse was restored in all patients and all reported recovered self-esteem.

CONCLUSIONImproving patient satisfaction with the surgical treatment includes proper preoperative evaluation on stable disease, penile shortening, vascular and erectile status, patient decision and selection as well as extensive discussion on surgical technique for restoring functional penis (length and rigidity). Length and girth restoration is very important for self-esteem and patient satisfaction.

Adult ; Aged ; Coitus ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Penile Implantation ; methods ; Penile Induration ; pathology ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Penis ; pathology ; surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; methods

Peyronie's disease is a common condition resulting in penile deformity, psychological bother, and sexual dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction is one common comorbid condition seen in men with Peyronie's disease, and its presence significantly impacts treatment considerations. In a man with Peyronie's disease and significant erectile dysfunction who desires the most reliable treatment, penile prosthesis placement should be strongly considered. In some instances, such as those patients with relatively mild curvature, prosthesis placement alone may result in adequate straightening. However, many patients will require additional straightening maneuvers such as manual modeling, penile plication, and tunica albuginea incision with or without grafting. For patients with severe penile shortening, penile length restoration techniques may also be considered. Herein, we provide a comprehensive clinical review of penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie's disease. Specifically, we discuss preoperative indications, intraoperative considerations, adjunctive straightening maneuvers, and postoperative outcomes.
Erectile Dysfunction/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation/methods* ; Penile Induration/surgery* ; Plastic Surgery Procedures ; Suture Techniques ; Traction ; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods*

Urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are both very prevalent conditions. Insertion of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and penile prosthesis (PP) is an effective and proven method of treatment for both conditions. With advancing age, as well as with increasing populations of patients radically treated for prostate cancer, the occurrence of both conditions found in the same patient is increasing. The purpose of this article was to analyze the available evidence for simultaneous surgical management of male ED and UI using prosthetic devices. The existing literature pertaining to dual implantation of AUS and PP was reviewed. The concomitant insertion of the PP with the male perineal sling was also considered. Concurrent ED and UI are increasingly seen in the post radical prostatectomy population, who are often younger and less willing to suffer with these conditions. Insertion of an AUS and PP, either simultaneously or as a two-stage procedure, appears to be a safe, efficacious and long-lasting method of treatment. The improvements in design of both the AUS and PP as well as the development of the single transverse scrotal incision have made simultaneous insertion of these prostheses possible. Dual implantation of the PP and male sling looks promising in a selected population. In conclusion, the insertion of the AUS and PP for the treatment of concurrent UI and ED is safe and effective. Simultaneous insertion of these prostheses in the same patient offers potential advantages in operative and recovery time and is associated with high patient satisfaction. Combination therapy should therefore be included in the arsenal of treatment of these conditions.
Equipment Failure ; statistics & numerical data ; Erectile Dysfunction ; complications ; surgery ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation ; methods ; Penile Prosthesis ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Prosthesis Implantation ; methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Incontinence ; complications ; surgery ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial

The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the standard of care in men with severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following prostate surgery and radiation. While the current AUS provides an effective, safe, and durable treatment option, it is not without its limitations and complications, especially with regard to its utility in some "high-risk" populations. This article provides a critical review of relevant publications pertaining to AUS surgery in specific high-risk groups such as men with spinal cord injury, revision cases, concurrent penile prosthesis implant, and female SUI. The discussion of each category includes a brief review of surgical challenge and a practical action-based set of recommendations. Our increased understandings of the pathophysiology of various SUI cases coupled with effective therapeutic strategies to enhance AUS surgery continue to improve clinical outcomes of many patients with SUI.
Erectile Dysfunction/surgery* ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation ; Prosthesis Implantation/methods* ; Reoperation ; Spinal Cord Injuries/complications* ; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/surgery* ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery* ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial

The field of prosthetic urology demonstrates the striking impact that simple devices can have on quality of life. Penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter implantation are the cornerstone procedures on which this specialty focuses. Modern research largely concentrates on decreasing the rates of complication and infection, as the current devices offer superior rates of satisfaction when revision is not necessary. These techniques are also able to salvage sexual function and continence in more difficult patient populations including female-to-male transgender individuals, those with ischemic priapism, and those with erectile dysfunction and incontinence secondary to prostatectomy. This review summarizes modern techniques, outcomes, and complications in the field of prosthetic urology.
Erectile Dysfunction/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation/methods* ; Penile Prosthesis ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Prostatectomy/adverse effects* ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis Implantation/methods* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology* ; Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology* ; Urethra/injuries* ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery* ; Urinary Retention/epidemiology* ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial ; Urology