Objective To analyze the application of a nursing outcome classification system in postoperative nursing of liver transplantation patients and its influence on the quality of clinical nursing records.Methods A total of 44 patients who underwent liver transplantation in a tertiary A general hospital in Zhejiang Province from March to August 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method.According to the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International-Nursing Outcomes Classification linked scale of liver transplantation,nurses used the five-level classification method to score and review the liver transplantation patients on the day after surgery,3d after surgery,7d after surgery,14d after surgery,and on the day of discharge.The nursing outcome classification scores at 5 time points were statistically analyzed.The nursing records of 44 patients with liver transplantation from June to December 2022 were retrospectively collected by convenient sampling,and 44 nursing records before Nursing Outcomes Classification application and 44 nursing records after Nursing Outcomes Classification implementation were measured by Quality of Documentation of Nursing Diagnoses,Interventions and Outcomes.Results The Nursing Outcomes Classification scores of 15 nursing diagnoses were analyzed by single factor repeated measurement,and 9 of them showed continuous improvement and significant difference at 4 measurement time points(P＜0.05).After Nursing Outcomes Classification implementation,the total score of nursing record quality,nursing diagnosis and nursing outcome record quality scores were higher than those before implementation,with statistically significant differences(P＜0.05).Conclusion The nursing outcome classification system can be used to evaluate the postoperative health status and nursing effect of adult liver transplantation patients.It has high specialty specificity and can improve the quality of nursing records.

Objective:To summarize the best evidence of prevention strategies for pressure injury in adult hospitalized burn patients.Methods:A bibliometric approach was used. Systematic searches were carried out to retrieve the published evidence of prevention strategies for pressure injury in adult hospitalized burn patients in the official websites of relevant academic organizations such as International Society for Burn injury, American Burn Association, and Japanese Dermatology Association, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, European Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance International Guidelines Website, foreign language databases such as UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, MedSci, Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-Based Practice Database, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed, and Chinese databases such as China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and China Clinical Guidelines Library. The literature types include clinical decision-making, evidence summary, guidelines, systematic review, and expert consensus. The search time was till February 21 st, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality, and other researchers extracted and graded the evidence according to the topic. Results:A total of 10 papers were included, including 6 evidence summaries, 3 guidelines, and 1 expert consensus, all with high literature quality. After extracting evidence and classifying, 27 pieces of best evidences were summarized from three aspects, including prevention training and supervision, risk assessment, and prevention measures of pressure injury.Conclusions:A total of 27 pieces of best evidences of prevention strategies for pressure injury in adult hospitalized burn patients were summarized from 3 aspects. Medical workers can follow the best evidence and give personalized prevention strategies according to the specific condition of adult hospitalized burn patients to reduce the incidence of pressure injury.

Objective To comprehensively evaluate the current clinical application status of evidence regarding immunosuppressive medication compliance management in kidney transplant patients,construct review indicators,analyze the obstacles and promoting factors,and further formulate reform strategies.Methods Using the Joanna Briggs Institute evidence-based health care model as the theoretical framework,clinical nursing issues were identified,and a systematic search,evaluation,and summarization of 38 items of evidence were conducted.An evidence-based practice group was established;review indicators were constructed;review methods were clarified.Baseline reviews of systems,healthcare professionals,patients,and their families were conducted from November 1,2022,to January 31,2023.According to the review results,the obstacles and promoting factors in the process of evidence-based practice were analyzed,and corresponding strategies were formulated.Results A total of 23 review indicators were constructed.Among them,the accurate execution rate of 15 indicators was less than 60％,and the accurate execution rate of 4 indicators was 0.The main obstacles include a lack of systems and processes in departments,poor knowledge,attitude,and practice of medical staff,a lack of standardized risk assessment,and a lack of information support for out-of-hospital management.The primary promoting factors are strong organizational leadership,multidisciplinary team support,and high participation enthusiasm of recipients and their families.Corresponding reform strategies are formulated accordingly,including process and system improvement,continuous quality monitoring,enhanced standardized training and assessment,electronic health intervention for medication compliance,and involving patients and their families in the medication compliance management process.Conclusion There is a significant gap between the evidence on immunosuppressive medication compliance management in kidney transplant patients and its clinical practice.It is essential to assess the obstacles and facilitators scientifically and comprehensively in clinical situations,employ targeted reform strategies,facilitate the translation of evidence into clinical practice,and enhance the quality of nursing care.

Objective:To construct a postoperative nursing plan for liver transplant recipients using the NANDA international, nursing outcomes classification, nursing intervention classification (NANDA-I-NOC-NIC) link (referred to as NNN-link) as the theoretical framework, so as to optimize the nursing process after liver transplantation and improve the quality of nursing.Methods:This study retrospectively collected nursing diagnoses with a postoperative usage rate of over 50% from 300 liver transplant recipients at Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021, and matched nursing outcomes and measures based on the NNN-link theory framework. After two rounds of Delphi expert consultation and group discussion, the entry content was rated, discussed, and modified to form the final version of the postoperative NNN-link for liver transplant recipients.Results:In two rounds of expert consultation, the recovery rates were 96.67% (29/30) and 100.00% (29/29) , respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. The Kendall harmony coefficients for the second round were 0.50, 0.38, 0.35. The final postoperative NNN-link for liver transplant recipients included 15 nursing diagnoses, 42 nursing outcomes, and 106 nursing measures.Conclusions:The process of constructing the postoperative NNN-link for liver transplant recipients is scientific and reasonable, and the entries are highly specialized, which can provide reference for clinical nursing after liver transplantation.