1.Influence of hydrotherapy combined with breathing training on lung function and activity ability of patients with thoracolumbar spinal cord injury
Deng YANG ; Ying CHEN ; Ye WANG ; Weitao WANG ; Cheng YANG ; Qiang MA ; Pengsheng HUI ; Shuyan QIE
Clinical Medicine of China 2021;37(3):269-274
Objective:To explore the effect of hydrotherapy combined with breathing training on lung function and mobility of patients with thoracolumbar spinal cord injury.Methods:A total of 80 patients with thoracolumbar spinal cord injury admitted to Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from April 2018 to March 2020 were selected as observation objects.A prospective cohort study was conducted and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 40 cases in each group.The control group was given routine rehabilitation therapy combined with respiratory training.On the basis of the control group, the observation group was treated with water therapy.The indexes of lung function, motor function, lower limb muscle tension, function evaluation and activities of daily living were compared between the two groups.Results:After intervention, the observation group′s forced vital capacity (FVC) was (3.86±0.82) L, the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was (3.76±0.68) L, the maximum ventilation (MVV) was (102.34±10.38) L/min, the maximum suction pressure (MIP) is (50.36±4.62) cmH 2O; the control group FVC was (3.41±0.76) L, and FEV1 was ( 3.35±0.63) L, MVV was (90.67±11.68) L/min, MIP was (44.38±4.85) cmH 2O, the difference between the two groups is statistically significant ( t=2.546, 2.797, 4.723, 5.646, respectively, all P<0.05). After the intervention, the motor function score of the american spinal injury association (ASIA) of the observation group was (58.62±7.56) points, and the modified ashworth scale (MAS) score was (2.74±0.89) points; The ASIA motor function score of the control group was (42.24±6.40) points, and the MAS score was (3.36±0.94) points.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( t=10.459 and -3.029, respectively, all P<0.05). After intervention, the observation group′s spinal cord independence measure (SCIM III) score was (75.33±10.72) points, and the modified barthel index (MBI) was (66.64±6.34) points; the SCIM III score of the control group was (68.34±9.55) points, and the MBI score was (57.52±6.77) points, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( t=3.079 and 6.219, respectively, all P<0.05). Conclusion:Hydrotherapy combined with breathing training can significantly improve lung function and respiratory muscle strength in patients with thoracolumbar spinal cord injury, and improve motor function and ability of daily living.
2.Comparison of open reduction and locking plating versus closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nailing in treatment of humeral surgical neck fractures
Pengsheng YE ; Shuxiang CHEN ; Peng SUO ; Jinrong HU ; Jian CHEN ; Zhonghua CHEN ; Zhiming XU
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2021;23(8):723-726
Objective:To compare the curative efficacy in the treatment of humeral surgical neck fractures between open reduction and locking plating versus closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nailing.Methods:From July 2018 to July 2020, 60 patients with humeral surgical neck fracture were treated at Department of Orthorpaedic Trauma, Jiangmen Wuyi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. They were 24 males and 36 females, aged from 40 to 70 years and injured at the left side in 35 cases and at the right side in 25 ones. Of them, 30 underwent open reduction and locking plating (open group) and the other 30 closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nailing (closed group). The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical incision length, fracture healing time, Neer shoulder function scoring 3 months after surgery, and postoperative complications.Results:There were no statistically significant differences between the open and closed groups in preoperative general data, showing they were comparable ( P>0.05). The length of surgical incision [(5.2±1.1) cm], operation time [(34.3±12.7) min], intraoperative blood loss [(52.5±7.3) mL] and fracture healing time [(9.2±1.5) weeks] in the closed group were significantly better than those in the open group [(11.1±2.5) cm, (69.4±21.4) min, (123.5±5.2) mL and (14.2±3.4) weeks)] ( P<0.05). The excellent and good rate by Neer shoulder function scoring at 3 months after operation in the closed group (93.3%, 28/30) was significantly higher than that in the open group (66.7%, 20/30) ( P<0.05). There were no postoperative complications in either group. Conclusion:In the treatment of humeral surgical neck fractures, the curative efficacy of closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nailing is better than that of open reduction and locking plating.