Objective To comparatively observe the value of TIPS combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis and percutaneous transhepatic portal vein catheterization thrombolysis for acute non-cirrhotic non-neoplastic portal vein thrombosis(PVT).Methods Twenty-five patients with acute non-cirrhotic non-neoplastic PVT were retrospectively enrolled and clustered into TIPS group(n=17,underwent TIPS combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis)and liver puncture group(n=8,underwent percutaneous transhepatic portal vein catheterization thrombolysis)according to the access of thrombolysis.The technical success rate,duration of catheter-directed thrombolysis,complications within 7 days,as well as portal vein patency 3 months after treatment,Child-Pugh grading of liver function and occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy(HE)were recorded and compared between groups.Results The technical success rates were both 100%in 2 groups.There was no significant difference of the duration of catheter-directed thrombolysis between groups(P＞0.05).The thrombolytic effect in TIPS group was better than that in liver puncture group(P＜0.05).No significant difference of the occurrence of bleeding within 7 days was found between groups(P＞0.05).After 3 months'follow-up,the degree of portal vein patency in TIPS group was higher than that in liver puncture group(P＜0.05).No significant difference of Child-Pugh grading of liver function nor occurrence of HE was found between groups(both P＞0.05).Conclusion Both TIPS combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis and percutaneous transhepatic portal vein catheterization thrombolysis were effective for treating acute non-cirrhotic non-neoplastic PVT,and the thrombolytic effect of the former was better than the latter.