INTRODUCTIONThe SingHealth Residency General Surgery Programme replaced the basic and advanced specialist training (AST) system in Singapore in 2010. The relative merits of both systems continue to be debated, especially the operational readiness of graduating residents. We set out to compare the operative and endoscopic volumes of graduates from the AST system with those from the first graduating batch of the residency programme during their registrar (or equivalent) years, as a reflection of procedural experience gained during traineeship.

METHODSOperative and endoscopic records of four graduating residents and seven AST system trainees were extracted from the cluster-wide Operating Theatre Management system and compared. Surgeries were analysed as registrar-level operations and their corresponding subspecialties.

RESULTSRegistrars and senior residents performed a mean of 1,182 and 533 general surgical operations, respectively. Median percentage loss in operative volume was 50.6% (range 9.6%-75.5%). The mean number of total gastroscopies and colonoscopies performed by registrars (total gastroscopy, n = 819; total colonoscopy, n = 743) and senior residents (total gastroscopy, n = 376; total colonoscopy, n = 412) indicated a mean loss of 54.1% and 44.6%, respectively, in gastroscopic and colonoscopic experience.

CONCLUSIONThe residency programme aims to provide robust and complete surgical training. The operational readiness of its graduates is often scrutinised against that from the old system. Although a significant difference in surgical and endoscopic volumes was observed between the two trainee groups, this is only one marker of surgical experience and technical competence.

INTRODUCTIONThis study aims to determine if the quantitative method of region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of lesion attenuation on CT may be a useful adjunct to the conventional approach of diagnosis by visual assessment in assessing tracer wash-out in hepatocellular carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODSFrom a surgical database of 289 patients from 2 institutions, all patients with complete surgical, pathological and preoperative multiphasic CT scans available for review were selected. For each phase of scanning, HU readings of lesion obtained (Lesion(arterial), Lesion(PV) and Lesion(equilibrium)) were analysed using receiver operating curves (ROC) to determine the optimal method and cut-off value for quantitative assessment of tumour wash-out (Lesion(arterial - equilibrium), Lesion(PV - equilibrium) or Lesion(peak - equilibrium)).

RESULTSNinety-four patients with one lesion each met the inclusion criteria. The area under the curve (AUC) values for Lesion(arterial - equilibrium) (0.941) was higher than the AUC for Lesion(pv - equilibrium) (0.484) and for Lesion(peak - equilibrium) (0.667). Based on ROC analysis, a cut-off of 10HU value for Lesion(arterial - equilibrium) would yield sensitivity and specificity of 91.5% and 80.9%, respectively. ROI analysis detected 9/21 (42.9%) of lesions missed by visual analysis. Combined ROI and visual analysis yields a sensitivity of 82/94 (87.2%) compared to 73/94 (77.7%) for visual analysis alone.

CONCLUSIONUsing a cut-off of 10 HU attenuation difference between the arterial and equilibrium phases is a simple and objective method that can be included as an adjunct to visual assessment to improve sensitivity for determining lesion wash-out on CT.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery ; Confidence Intervals ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Humans ; Liver ; pathology ; Liver Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Preoperative Period ; ROC Curve ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; instrumentation ; Young Adult

INTRODUCTIONThe use of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has increased worldwide due to the reported advantages associated with this minimally invasive procedure. However, widespread adoption is hindered by its technical complexity. Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) was introduced to overcome this limitation, but worldwide experience with RDP is still lacking. There is presently evidence that RDP is associated with decreased conversion rate and increased splenic preservation as compared to LDP.

METHODSWe conducted a prospective study on our initial experience with robotic spleen-saving, vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SSVP-DP) between July 2013 and April 2014.

RESULTSThree consecutive patients underwent attempted robotic SSVP-DP. The indications were a 2.1-cm indeterminate cystic neoplasm, 4.5-cm solid pseudopapillary neoplasm and 1.2-cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour. For all three patients, the procedure was completed without conversion, and the spleen, with its main vessels, was successfully conserved. The median total operation time, blood loss and postoperative stay were 350 (range 300-540) minutes, 200 (range 50-300) mL and 7 (range 6-14) days, respectively. Two patients had minor Clavien-Dindo Grade I complications (one Grade A pancreatic fistula and one postoperative ileus). One patient had a Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa complication (Grade B pancreatic fistula requiring percutaneous drainage). All patients were well at the time of reporting after at least six months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONOur preliminary experience with robotic SSVP-DP confirmed the feasibility of the procedure.

Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organ Sparing Treatments ; Pancreatectomy ; methods ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; surgery ; Patient Positioning ; Prospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Singapore ; Spleen ; surgery ; Young Adult

INTRODUCTIONExperience with robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery remains limited worldwide. In this study, we report our early experience with RAL HPB surgery in Singapore.

METHODSA retrospective review of the first 20 consecutive patients who underwent RAL HPB surgery at a single institution over a 34-month period from February 2013 to November 2015 was conducted. The 20 cases were performed by three principal surgeons, of which 17 (85.0%) were performed by a single surgeon.

RESULTSThe median age of patients was 56 (range 22-75) years and median tumour size was 4.0 (range 1.2-7.5) cm. The surgeries performed included left-sided pancreatectomies (n = 10), hepatectomies (n = 7), triple bypass with bile duct exploration for obstructing pancreatic head cancer with choledocholithiasis (n = 1), cholecystectomy for Mirizzi's syndrome (n = 1) and gastric resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (n = 1). The median operation time was 445 (range 80-825) minutes and median blood loss was 350 (range 0-1,200) mL. There was only 1 (5%) open conversion. There were 2 (10.0%) major morbidities (> Grade II on the Clavien-Dindo classification) and no 30-day/in-hospital mortalities. There was no reoperation for postoperative complications. The median postoperative stay was 5.5 (range 3-22) days.

CONCLUSIONOur initial experience confirms the feasibility and safety of RAL HPB surgery.

Adult ; Aged ; Bile Ducts ; surgery ; Cholecystectomy ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Pancreas ; surgery ; Pancreatectomy ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Singapore ; Young Adult

INTRODUCTIONIn this study, we report our initial experience with robotic hepatectomy.

METHODSConsecutive patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy at Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, from February 2013 to February 2015 were enrolled in this study. The difficulty level of operations was graded using a novel scoring system for laparoscopic hepatectomies.

RESULTSDuring the two-year period, five consecutive robotic hepatectomies were performed (one left lateral sectionectomy, one non-anatomical segment II/III resection, one anatomical segment V resection with cholecystectomy, one extended right posterior sectionectomy and one non-anatomical segment V/VI resection). Two hepatectomies were performed for suspected hepatocellular carcinoma, two for solitary liver metastases and one for a large symptomatic haemangioma. The median age of the patients was 53 (range 38-66) years and the median tumour size was 2.5 (range 2.1-7.3) cm. The median total operation time was 340 (range 155-825) minutes and the median volume of blood loss was 300 (range 50-1,200) mL. There were no open conversions and no mortalities or major morbidities (> Clavien-Dindo Grade II). The difficulty level of the operations was graded as low in one case (Score 2), intermediate in three cases (Score 5, 6 and 6) and high in one case (Score 10). There was one minor morbidity, where the patient experienced Grade A bile leakage, which resolved spontaneously. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 5 (range 4-7) days.

CONCLUSIONOur initial experience confirmed the feasibility and safety of robotic hepatectomy.

Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hepatectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Liver Neoplasms ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Prospective Studies ; Robotics ; Singapore

INTRODUCTIONWe aimed to analyse the changing trends, safety and outcomes associated with the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) at a single centre.

METHODSA retrospective review of patients who underwent LLR from 2006 to 2014 at our institution was performed. To explore the evolution of LLR, the study was divided into three equal consecutive time periods (Period 1: 2006-2008, Period 2: 2009-2011, and Period 3: 2012-2014).

RESULTSAmong 195 patients who underwent LLR, 24 (12.3%) required open conversions, 68 (34.9%) had resection of tumours in the difficult posterosuperior segments and 12 (6.2%) underwent major (≥ 3 segments) hepatectomies. Median operation time was 210 (range 40-620) minutes and median postoperative stay was 4 (range 1-26) days. Major postoperative morbidity (> Grade II) occurred in 11 (5.6%) patients and 90-day/in-hospital mortality was 1 (0.5%). During the study, the number of LLRs performed showed an increasing trend (Period 1: n = 22; Period 2: n = 19; Period 3: n = 154). Other statistically significant trends were: (a) increase in malignant neoplasms resected; (b) increase in resections of difficult posterosuperior segments; (c) longer median operation time; and (d) decrease in open conversion rates.

CONCLUSIONOver the study period, the number of LLRs increased rapidly. LLR was increasingly performed for malignant neoplasms and lesions located in the difficult posterosuperior segments, resulting in longer operation times. However, open conversion rates decreased, and there was no change in postoperative morbidity and other perioperative outcomes.