Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is non-fatal conditions which can markedly affect a patient's quality of life. Multiple recently developed pelvic reconstructive surgeries have led to a recent expansion in China. In this study, we would like to discuss various aspects of the evaluation and management of POP and raise the question of what is sufficient evidence for the adoption of innovative treatments for POP.
China ; epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo evaluate clinical effectiveness of total pelvic floor reconstruction surgery for repair of severe pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 21 patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse. The anatomical outcomes were evaluated by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation, functional effectiveness by Prolapse Quality of Life method, and sexual function and operation-related complications were also analyzed.

RESULTSAll surgical operations were accomplished successfully by the same surgeon. No impairment of bladder, urethra, rectum, or great vessels was noted, and no patient required blood transfusion. The mean operation duration was (63±19) minutes, and the mean intra-operative blood loss was (143±72) ml. One patients experienced post-operative urinary retention for 7 days, and the remaining 20 patients were able to micturate spontaneously 1-2 day after surgery. The post-operative morbidity rate was 14.3%. Three patients (14.3%) experienced mesh erosion. Of 12 patients who were sexually active, two patients suffered from algopareunia from dyspareunia, one from de novo overactive bladder, and one from stress urinary incontinence Questionnaire scores showed that the overall post operative quality of life was improved significantly (P=0.000), while quality of sexual life significantly degraded (P=0.044) The anatomic cure rate was 95.2% (20/21), and the patient subjective satisfaction rate was 85.7% (18/21)

CONCLUSIONSThe total pelvic floor reconstruction is a safe and effective approach for the repair of severe pelvic organ prolapse, although its functional effectiveness is not as notable as anatomical outcomes However, the complications such as mesh erosion, low urinary tract symptoms, algopareunia, and dyspareunia should be carefully managed.

Aged ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Floor ; surgery ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes and safety of robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) in patients with uterine/vaginal vault prolapse. METHODS: Between January 2009 and June 2015, 16 women with apical prolapse underwent RSC. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination was performed, and treatment success was defined as the presence of grade 0 or I apical prolapse upon POP-Q examination at the final follow-up. Pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-SF 20) was administered at every follow-up. A treatment satisfaction questionnaire was administered by telephone to evaluate patient satisfaction with the operation. RESULTS: Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–68 years), and follow-up duration was 25.3 months (IQR, 5.4–34.0 months). Thirteen women (81.3%) had ≥grade III apical prolapse. Operation time was 251 minutes (IQR, 236–288 minutes), and blood loss was 75 mL (IQR, 50–150 mL). Median hospital stay was 4 days (IQR, 3–5 days). At the final follow-up, treatment success was reported in all patients, who presented grade 0 (n=8, 57.1%) and grade I (n=6, 42.9%) apical prolapse. Dramatic improvements in PFDI-SF 20 scores were noted after RSC (from 39 to 4; P=0.001). Most patients (12 of 13) were satisfied with RSC. An intraoperative complication (sacral venous plexus injury) was reported in 1 patient, and there was no conversion to open surgery. Mesh erosion was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: RSC is an efficient and safe surgical option for apical prolapse repair. Most patients were satisfied with RSC. Thus, RSC might be one of the best treatment options for apical prolapse in women.
Conversion to Open Surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; Length of Stay ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pelvic Floor ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse* ; Prolapse ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Telephone ; Uterine Prolapse

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse on female sexual function and to assess correlations between the two using two current standardized questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2009 to September 2010, 143 patients with posterior compartment or combined vaginal prolapse were included. We assessed surgical outcomes according to anatomical change in the vagina and results of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function questionnaire (PISQ-12) both pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Among the 143 preoperative patients, 99 and 84 patients responded to the PISQ-12 and FSFI, respectively. The mean PISQ-12 score increased after surgery (p<0.001). Specifically, postoperative scores for questions 8 and 12 were higher than their respective preoperative scores (p<0.001). Postoperatively, mean FSFI score changed only slightly (p=0.76), and only the score for the satisfaction domain was improved (p=0.023). In regards to vaginal anatomy, vaginal length was significantly greater postoperatively (6.99+/-0.18 vs. 7.56+/-1.08, p<0.001), and postoperative vaginal caliber was narrowed to a two-finger width. CONCLUSION: In this study, surgery for pelvic organ prolapse was shown to affect female sexual function. Moreover, menopause was associated with a change in postoperative sexual function.
Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse/*physiopathology/*surgery ; Questionnaires ; Sexual Behavior/*physiology

Quality of life is adversely affected by pelvic organ prolapse, the prevalence of which is increasing because of the persistently growing older population. Today, the tension-free vaginal mesh kit has grown in popularity owing to its comparable cure rate to traditional reconstructive surgery and the feasibility of an early return to normal life. However, significant debate remains over the long-term cure rate and the safety of tension-free vaginal mesh in the United States. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends obtaining informed consent about the safety and cure rate when the patient chooses surgery using the tension-free vaginal mesh kit or meshes before surgery. The goal of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse is the restoration of anatomic defects. This review article provides an overview of basic surgical techniques and the results, advantages, and disadvantages of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
*Disease Management ; Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Humans ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse/*surgery ; Quality of Life

Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Surgical mesh has been used since the 1950s to repair abdominal hernias. In the 1970s, gynecologists began using surgical mesh products to indicate the repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and in the 1990s, gynecologists began using surgical mesh for POP. Then the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first surgical mesh product specifically for use in POP. Surgical mesh materials can be divided into several categories. Most surgical mesh devices cleared for POP procedures are composed of non-absorbable synthetic polypropylene. Mesh can be placed in the anterior vaginal wall to aid in the correction of cystocele (anterior repair), in the posterior vaginal wall to aid in correction of rectocele (posterior repair), or attached to the top of the vagina to correct uterine prolapse or vaginal apical prolapse (apical repair). Over the past decades, surgical mesh products for transvaginal POP repair became incorporated into "kits" that included tools to aid in the delivery and insertion of the mesh. Surgical mesh kits continue to evolve, adding new insertion tools, tissue fixation anchors, surgical techniques, and ab- sorbable and biological materials. This procedure has been performed popularly. It was also performed increased in China. But this new technique met some trouble recently and let shake in urogynecology.
China ; Female ; Humans ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse ; surgery ; Surgical Mesh ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration ; Vagina ; surgery

BACKGROUNDAlthough repair augmented with mesh has been proved its priority in anatomical and functional recovery after anterior compartment reconstruction, the data about posterior compartment are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare bowel functional outcome of posterior vaginal compartment repair with and without mesh in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODSThis was a prospective, double-blind, clinical pilot study of 22 postmenopausal women with symptomatic POP (overall POP-quantification [POP-Q] Stage III-IV) who underwent total pelvic floor reconstruction. Patients were grouped according to the use of mesh for posterior vaginal compartment repair: A mesh group and a nonmesh group. POP-Q stage, the pelvic floor impact questionnaire short form-7 (PFIQ-7) and anorectal manometry were evaluated before and 3 months after surgery. Anatomical success was defined as POP-Q Stage II or less. A t-test was used to compare preoperative with postoperative data in the two groups.

RESULTSTotally, 17 (71%) were available for the follow-up. POP-Q measurements improved significantly compared to baseline (P < 0.05) in both groups. No recurrence was observed. Subjects in both groups reported improvement in pelvic floor symptoms, and there was no significant difference in the PFIQ-7 score between groups at follow-up (P > 0.05). Compared with baseline, the nonmesh group exhibited a statistically significant decrease in anal residual pressure, a significant increase in the anorectal pressure difference during bowel movement, and a reduced rate of dyssynergia defecation pattern (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSProvided there is sufficient support for the anterior wall and apex of vagina with mesh, posterior compartment repair without mesh may be as effective as repair with mesh for anatomical recovery while providing better anorectal motor function.

Aged ; Constipation ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Manometry ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse ; surgery ; Surgical Mesh ; adverse effects

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical outcome of a novel approach for pelvic floor reconstruction using synthetic mesh (modified total pelvic floor reconstruction) for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODSModified total pelvic floor reconstruction was performed in 30 patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse (including vault prolapse). The clinical outcome of each patient was assessed.

RESULTSThe mean operation time was (74.2 +/- 21.5) minutes, and the mean blood loss was (103.3 +/- 40.1) ml. Among them, 23 patients (76.7%) were able to micturate spontaneously the next morning after surgery, with residual urine less than 100 ml. The mean post-operative hospital stay was (4.2 +/- 1.8) days. All patients were followed up for a medium of 6 months. Totally 93.3% and 96.7% of patients were objectively (according to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitive Examination score) and subjectively (according to Prolapse Quality of Life) cured, respectively. During follow-up, only one patient was found to have asymptomatic erosion, and de novo urgent urinary incontinence was seen in 6.7% of patients. The most prominent complication was dyspareunia (66.7%). Although the post-operative sexual function was reported to be worse, no significant difference between patients' pre- and post-operative Pelvic Organ Prolapse/ Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire-12 scores was noted.

CONCLUSIONModified total pelvic floor reconstruction is a safe, effective, and micro-invasive approach for severe pelvic organ prolapse repair; however, dyspareunia remains a main concern.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Dyspareunia ; etiology ; Humans ; Pelvic Floor ; surgery ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse ; complications ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Quality of Life ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: It has been a global trend that increasing complications related to pelvic floor surgeries have been reported over time. The current study aimed to outline the development of Chinese pelvic floor surgeries related to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) over the past 14 years and investigate the potential influence of enhanced monitoring conducted by the Chinese Association of Urogynecology since 2011. METHODS: A total of 44,594 women with POP who underwent pelvic floor surgeries between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2018 were included from 22 tertiary academic medical centers. The data were reported voluntarily and obtained from a database. We compared the proportion of each procedure in the 7 years before and 7 years after September 30, 2011. The data were analyzed by performing Z test (one-sided). RESULTS: The number of different procedures during October 1, 2011-September 30, 2018 was more than twice that during October 1, 2004-September 30, 2011. Regarding pelvic floor surgeries related to POP, the rate of synthetic mesh procedures increased from 38.1% (5298/13,906) during October 1, 2004-September 30, 2011 to 46.0% (14,107/30,688) during October 1, 2011-September 30, 2018, whereas the rate of non-mesh procedures decreased from 61.9% (8608/13,906) to 54.0% (16,581/30,688) (Z = 15.53, P < 0.001). Regarding synthetic mesh surgeries related to POP, the rates of transvaginal placement of surgical mesh (TVM) procedures decreased from 94.1% (4983/5298) to 82.2% (11,603/14,107) (Z = 20.79, P < 0.001), but the rate of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) procedures increased from 5.9% (315/5298) to 17.8% (2504/14,107). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of synthetic mesh procedures increased while that of non-mesh procedures decreased significantly. The rate of TVM procedures decreased while the rate of LSC procedures increased significantly. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03620565, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov.
China ; Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Pelvic Floor/surgery* ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery* ; Surgical Mesh/adverse effects* ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagina

OBJECTIVETo explore the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic tunnel-like peri-anterior superior iliac spine suspension(L-TASISS) or combined with stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with outlet obstructive constipation (OOC).

METHODSA total of 119 POP patients complicated with OOC( II( to IIII( stage evaluated by POP-Q) received L-TASISS or combined with STARR in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from August 2010 to January 2015. Clinical and follow-up data of these patients were analyzed retrospectively and compared before and after operation.

RESULTSAmong 119 cases, 51 cases(42.9%) underwent L-TASISS alone, and 68 cases (57.1%) received L-TASISS combined with STARR. All the 119 patients were successfully operated without conversion to open surgery. The operation time was (67.8±10.9) minutes, the intra-operative blood loss was (10.3±3.8) ml, the indwelling catheter time was (3.6±1.1) days, and hospital stay was (5.1±1.8) days. One month after operation, abdominal wall pain or stress occurred in 15 cases, of whom 3 cases were improved by local block injection, 1 case by incision stitches release, the rest ameliorated spontaneously within 3 months after surgery. No potential ureterostenosis, hydroureterosis, internal iliac vascular thrombosis resulting from compression of the mesh and other complications related to the mesh were found. One year after operation, all the patients were followed up. The OOC remission rate was 78.2%(93/119), of whom 76 cases were satisfied and 17 patients were completely satisfied. One case(0.8%) with stress urinary incontinence did not improve. Fifteen cases(12.6%) with algopareunia or dyspareunia did not achieve remission, but there was no new algopareunia or dyspareunia case. Eleven patients (9.2%) presented recurrence of symptoms, of whom 9 cases(7.6%) complained of sensation of incomplete evacuation. Two cases(1.7%) were graded as POP-Q II(, and 1 case (0.8%) as POP-Q III( after surgery. Constipation Score of all the patients was 1.4±0.9 (compared to 7.8±3.6 preoperatively) according to Rome III( criteria. Enterocele occurred in 53 cases (44.5%) preoperatively corresponded with only 1 case (0.8%) after operation (χ(2)=64.77, P=0.000). One hundred and six cases (86.6%) with defecation difficulties and 87 cases (73.1%) with sensation of incomplete evacuation before operation were significantly improved after surgery, corresponding with 7(5.9%) and 9 (7.6%) symptomatic cases respectively (χ(2)=155.78, P=0.000). Three cases (2.5%) with preoperative fecal incontinence symptoms were improved after operation as well.

CONCLUSIONThe procedure of L-TASISS or combined with STARR for POP patients with OCC has good short-term efficacy, and is safe and feasible.

Constipation ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Fecal Incontinence ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse ; surgery ; Rectal Prolapse ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome