Thirty-five cases of poorly differentiated carcinoma, of the lung were examined under electron microscopy and the results were compared with that of light microscopy. The results of histological typing coincided only in ten cases. Among twenty cases of poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed by light microscopy, 60% were adenosquamous carcinoma, 20% poorly differentiated adenocar-cinoma, 10% small cell carcinoma and only 10% poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma as they were scrutinized under electron microscopy. Among 5 cases of small cell carcinoma diagnosed light microscopically, 2 cases were carcinoid, one case poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, one case smalt cell carcinoma, and one case lympnoma diagnosed electron microscopically. Among 4 cases of carcinoid diagnosed electron microscopically, 2 cases were small cell carcinoma, one case large cell carcinoma,, and only one case of carcinoid diagnosed light microscopically. The results showed that 40% of all cases were adenosquamous carcinoma as shown by electron microscopy. For purpose of providing more-accurate histological types to the clinician, it is necessary and possible to study electron microscopically the poorly differentiated carcinoma of the lung.

Objective:To evaluate the value of p16 INK4a detected by p16 INK4a immunostaining as a new generation of cervical cytology for primary screening and secondary screening in population-based cervical cancer screening, and in improving cytological diagnosis. Methods:Between 2016 and 2018, 5 747 non-pregnant women aged 25-65 years with sexual history were recruited and underwent cervical cancer screening via high-risk (HR)-HPV/liquid-based cytological test (LCT) test in Shenzhen and surrounding areas. All slides were immuno-stained using p16 INK4a technology, among them, 902 cases were offered p16 INK4a detection during primary screening, and the remaining 4 845 cases were called-back by the virtue of abnormal HR-HPV and LCT results for p16 INK4a staining. Participants with complete LCT examination, HR-HPV test, p16 INK4a staining and histopathological examination results were included in this study. The performance of p16 INK4a in primary and secondary screening, and in assisting cytology to detect high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL, including cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) Ⅱ or Ⅲ] or worse [HSIL (CIN Ⅱ) + or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ) +] were analyzed. Results:(1) One-thousand and ninety-seven cases with complete data of p16 INK4a and histology were included. Pathological diagnosis: 995 cases of normal cervix, 37 cases of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 64 cases of HSIL and one case of cervical cancer were found. Among them, 65 cases of HSIL (CIN Ⅱ) + and 34 cases of HSIL (CIN Ⅲ) + were detected. The positive rate of p16 INK4a in HSIL (CIN Ⅱ) + was higher than that in CINⅠ or normal pathology (89.2% vs 10.2%; P<0.01). (2) p16 INK4a as primary screening for HSIL (CIN Ⅱ) + or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ) + was equally sensitive to primary HR-HPV screening (89.2% vs 95.4%, 94.1% vs 94.1%; P>0.05), but more specific than HR-HPV screening (89.8% vs 82.5%, 87.7% vs 80.2%; P<0.05). p16 INK4a was equally sensitive and similarly specific to cytology (≥LSIL; P>0.05). (3) The specificity of LCT adjunctive p16 INK4a for detecting HSIL (CIN Ⅱ) + or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ) + were higher than that of LCT alone or adjunctive HR-HPV ( P<0.01), while the sensitivity were similar ( P>0.05). (4) p16 INK4a staining as secondary screening: p16 INK4a was significantly more specific (94.1% vs 89.7%, 91.9% vs 87.4%; P<0.01) and comparably sensitive (84.6% vs 90.8%, 88.2% vs 91.2%; P>0.05) to cytology for triaging primary HR-HPV screening. HPV 16/18 to colposcopy and triage other HR-HPV with p16 INK4a was equally sensitive (88.2% vs 94.1%; P=0.500) and more specific (88.3% vs 83.0%; P<0.01) than HPV 16/18 to colposcopy and triage other HR-HPV with LCT≥ atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and the referral rate decreased (14.0% vs 19.4%; P=0.005). Conclusions:For primary screening, p16 INK4a is equally specific to cytology and equally sensitive to HR-HPV screening. p16 INK4a alone could be an efficient triage after primary HR-HPV screening. In addition, p16 INK4a immunostaining could be used as an ancillary tool to cervical cytological diagnosis, and improves its accuracy in cervical cancer screening.

Objective:To investigate the use of p16 INK4a immuno-stained cytology as the primary screening for cervical cancer prevention. Methods:From March to August 2018, 902 women from Shenzhen and surrounding area were recruited for cervical cancer screening with ThinPrep Cytologic Test (TCT), cobas4800 HPV test, and p16 INK4a co-test. Colpo/biopsies were performed using the point of interest biopsy protocol of directed and random cervical biopsies plus endocervical curettage for all women, any of whose tests was positive. Two senior cytopathologists interpreted TCT and p16 INK4a test. The performance of p16 INK4a for early detection of CIN2+ and inter-observer reproducibility of the interpretation of p16 INK4a were evaluated. Results:The positive rates of HPV test, p16 INK4a co-test and TCT diagnosed as LSIL/AGC or higher grade were 8.1% (73/902), 6.8% (61/902) and 4.7% (42/902), respectively. Colposcopy referring rate was 79.6% (109/137), among which 10 cases were diagnosed as CIN2+ (5 cases of CIN2 and 5 cases of CIN3). The sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ of p16 INK4a test, TCT (LSIL/AGC or higher grade) and HPV test were 90.0%, 80.0%, 100.0% and 90.9%, 91.9%, 82.5%, respectively. Compared to TCT and HPV test, there was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between p16 INK4a and TCT/HPV test ( P>0.05). The Kappa value of the 2 cytopathologists in interpreting p16 INK4a and TCT was 0.944 and 0.425, respectively ( P<0.05). Conclusions:p16 INK4a for cervical cancer screening is equally sensitive to HPV test and specific to TCT while subjective difference of cytopathologists′ interpretation of p16 INK4a is small. Therefore, p16 INK4a can be used as a new cervical cancer screen method for its better diagnostic performance.