Objective To compare the efficiencies of handheld ultrasound ,automated breast volume scanner ( ABVS) and breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in the diagnosis of breast cancer . Methods A retrospective review was performed in 200 women ( 210 breast lesions) underwent handheld ultrasound , ABVS and BSGI before surgery . The results were verified with histological examination . Results There was no obvious difference among the three methods in the sensitivity for the diagnosis of breast cancer( P >0 .05) . There was no difference of specificity between handheld ultrasound and ABVS ,BSGI( P = 0 .393 , 0 .139) . Compared with BSGI ,ABVS was an imaging modality with highest specificity for the diagnosis of breast cancer( P = 0 .021) ,and there was no difference between handheld ultrasound and ABVS ,BSGI ( P =0 .07 ,0 .29) . The areas under the ROC curve of handheld ultrasound ,ABVS and BSGI were 0 .855 ,0 .894 and 0 .818 ,respectively . The difference was obvious between ABVS and BSGI ( P = 0 .02) . Conclusions The diagnostic efficacy of ABVS in diagnosis of breast malignant lesions is similar to that of handheld ultrasound . BSGI has certain clinical value in the diagnosis of breast cancer ,and it is an effective supplement for breast cancer ultrasound examination .

Objective:To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in detecting minute renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) smaller than 15 mm (by ultrasonic measurement) and the strategy to improve its detection rate.Methods:Fifty-three pathologically confirmed MRCCs by surgery from November 2007 to October 2019 at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were enrolled in this retrospectively study. All of them underwent both conventional ultrasound and CEUS examinations. The clinical and imaging data were collected and analyzed. Common features, such as tumor size, location, echogenicity, morphology, border, and blood flow signals were observed on conventional ultrasound. On CEUS, the presence of enhancement, wash in and wash out pattern, perfusion uniformity within the lesions were observed.Results:Post-operative pathology confirmed 48 clear cell carcinomas, 4 papillary carcinomas, and 1 chromophobe cell carcinoma. On conventional ultrasound, 12/53 lesions showed no protrusion out of the kidney, and 41/53 cases slightly protruded out of the kidney. There was considerable difficulty in the detection of ten lesions, which was achieved with the guidance of CT/MRI, due to their dorsal location of the kidney. On conventional ultrasound, solid, hyper-echoic, color flow signal with varying degrees were the main features of MRCC.The boundary could be well- or ill-defined, and cystic changes existed in part of cases. On CEUS, most MRCCs showed simultaneous enhancement in cortical phase, iso- to hyper-enhancement at peak, and rapid washout in parenchymal phase. The comparisons of imaging features demonstrated that the characteristics were significantly different between conventional ultrasound and CEUS with regard to boundaries, blood supply, and perfusion uniformity (χ 2=12.425, 20.247, 7.185; all P<0.01). Conclusions:CEUS can significantly improve the detection rate of MRCC, which is superior to conventional ultrasound.

Objective:To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).Methods:Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 was performed on 19 papers that met the inclusion criteria, including tests for heterogeneity, relative risk ( RR), mean difference( MD) and publication bias. Results:For the Janus kinase inhibitor group compared with the control group in 19 studies, RR and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were 0.52 (95% CI: 0.44-0.62), 0.45 (95% CI: 0.25-0.83), and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03-1.43) for mortality, clinical deterioration and recovery rates, and the mean difference and 95% CI in recovery time was -0.96 (95% CI: -1.13--0.79); for adverse events (including serious adverse events, infections, embolism, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, liver dysfunction, psychiatric disorders, renal and urinary disorders), only the P-value for serious adverse events was statistically significant, P=0.010, and the RR and 95% CI were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72-0.97). Conclusions:JAK inhibitors help reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 without increasing the risk of adverse events.

Objective:To explore the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) in distinguishing of renal oncocytoma(RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma(chRCC).Methods:The ultrasonic image features of 49 ROs and 72 chRCCs between October 2007 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, all lesions underwent ultrasonic examination (including 19 ROs and 70 chRCCs with CEUS imaging) and were pathologically approved in our institution. The statistically significant parameters from univariate analyses were then entered for further multivariable Logistic regression. The value of each ultrasonic imaging feature in differentiating RO and chRCC was evaluated.Results:According to the univariate analyses, all imaging features on conventional ultrasound were not statistically different between RO and chRCC (all P>0.05), while the characteristics of tumor wash-in/out pattern, enhancement degree and homogeneity at peak time and pseudocapsule around tumor were significantly different (all P<0.05). After multivariable analyses, tumor wash-in and wash-out pattern were excluded for tumor differentiation ( P>0.05), and the parameters of enhancement degree or homogeneity at peak time and pseudocapsule around tumor were still significantly different between tumor types (all P<0.05, odd ratio was 8.683, 6.667 and 18.774 respectively). The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of these three parameters in diagnosing RO was 68.4%, 91.4% and 86.5%, respectively. Conclusions:CEUS can provide some useful information for the differentiation of RO and chRCC.

Objective:To investigate the survival of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) on the surface of inanimate objects at different temperatures.Methods:CNKI, WanFang Database, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for articles published from January 1, 2020 to June 15, 2022 with "2019-nCoV, surface, inanimate, environments, environmental, matrices, factors, conditions, contact, personal protective equipment, transmission, stability, persistence, viability, survival, survivability, infectivity, transmission". The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the data in the literature were extracted, the improved MINORS scale was used to evaluate the literature quality. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta analysis, and Stata17.0 software was used for Begg′s test and Egger′s test to evaluate the publication bias.Results:A total of 20 studies were included. Meta-analysis result showed that the survival ability of 2019-nCoV on the surface of non-porous objects (stainless steel, glass and plastic) was significantly different from that on the surface of porous objects (cloth, wood board, banknote, cotton, cardboard) ( Z=5.94, P<0.001; Z=17.85, P=0.004; Z=38.20, P<0.001). The result of subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the survival ability of the virus between banknotes and glass, plastic surfaces under the same conditions ( Z=0.81, P=0.420; Z=1.79, P=0.070). The half-life of the virus at 4 ℃ was significantly different from that at 25 ℃[ MD=47.49 h, 95% CI: 7.00~87.99, Z=2.30, P=0.020]; The half-life of the virus at 25 ℃ was also significantly different compared with that at 35 ℃[ MD=5.46 h, 95% CI: 0.13~10.78, Z=2.01, P=0.040]. Conclusions:Under the same conditions, the survival time of 2019-nCoV on the surface of nonporous objects was longer than that on the surface of porous objects, and the higher the temperature, the shorter the survival time.