1.How to Encourage Best Peer Reviewers: An Empiric Approach.
Omid MAHIAN ; Somchai WONGWISES
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(4):506-506
No abstract available.
Humans
;
*Peer Review, Research
2.Recognizing Our Peer Reviewers of 2012.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2013;46(2):61-61
No abstract available.
Humans
;
*Peer Review, Research
4.Authorship and Contributorship in Scholarly Journals.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(6):801-802
No abstract available.
*Authorship
;
Editorial Policies
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing
5.Safeguarding the Integrity of Science Communication by Restraining 'Rational Cheating' in Peer Review.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(11):1450-1452
Peer review is the pillar of the integrity of science communication. It is often beset with flaws as well as accusations of unreliability and lack of predictive validity. 'Rational cheating' by reviewers is a threat to the validity of peer review. It may diminish the value of good papers by unfavourable appraisals of the reviewers whose own works have lower scientific merits. This article analyzes the mechanics and defects of peer review and focuses on rational cheating in peer review, its implications, and options to restrain it.
Peer Review, Research/*ethics
;
Societies, Medical/ethics
6.Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(7):970-971
No abstract available.
*Biomedical Research
;
*Peer Review
;
Periodicals as Topic
;
Publishing
7.Our Valuable Contributors: Reviewers of 2017.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2018;51(2):63-63
No abstract available.
Periodicals as Topic*
;
Publishing*
;
Peer Review, Research
8.Practice of a Web-Based Paper Submission and Review System of a "Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association".
Kyung Ryeol CHA ; Ju Han KIM ; Byoung Hoon OH
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2005;44(3):281-286
The procedure of the online paper submission to the Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association is consisted of seven steps:entering type, author, title, keyword and abstracts of the paper, author's affiliation, uploading the paper file, and completion of submission. Six steps before the completion of submission could be reversed. But after this, no change will be possible. When editor decide that the paper is eligible, correspondence author will get the acceptance letter. The review of the paper will be done by selective reviewers. They will login to the system for the evaluation. The efficacy and the convenience of this system will be heightened by user's feedback (ex, systemic error, inconvenience, improvements, and ideas).
Peer Review
9.Peer Review.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2010;31(3):169-170
No abstract available.
Peer Review
10.The Korean Journal of Radiology Launches an Online Manuscript Submission and Tracking System for Peer Review.
Jung Eun CHEON ; Kyung Soo LEE
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 2005;53(3):157-157
No abstract available.
Peer Review*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail