1.How to Encourage Best Peer Reviewers: An Empiric Approach.
Omid MAHIAN ; Somchai WONGWISES
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(4):506-506
No abstract available.
Humans
;
*Peer Review, Research
2.Recognizing Our Peer Reviewers of 2012.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2013;46(2):61-61
No abstract available.
Humans
;
*Peer Review, Research
4.Authorship and Contributorship in Scholarly Journals.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(6):801-802
No abstract available.
*Authorship
;
Editorial Policies
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing
5.Safeguarding the Integrity of Science Communication by Restraining 'Rational Cheating' in Peer Review.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(11):1450-1452
Peer review is the pillar of the integrity of science communication. It is often beset with flaws as well as accusations of unreliability and lack of predictive validity. 'Rational cheating' by reviewers is a threat to the validity of peer review. It may diminish the value of good papers by unfavourable appraisals of the reviewers whose own works have lower scientific merits. This article analyzes the mechanics and defects of peer review and focuses on rational cheating in peer review, its implications, and options to restrain it.
Peer Review, Research/*ethics
;
Societies, Medical/ethics
6.Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(7):970-971
No abstract available.
*Biomedical Research
;
*Peer Review
;
Periodicals as Topic
;
Publishing
7.Our Valuable Contributors: Reviewers of 2017.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2018;51(2):63-63
No abstract available.
Periodicals as Topic*
;
Publishing*
;
Peer Review, Research
8.Peer Review System and Right to Reply.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2009;30(9):669-669
No abstract available.
Peer Review
9.Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers.
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2017;44(3):177-178
No abstract available.
Peer Review*
10.Analysis of Publications on Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society in 2004.
Hyun Tai CHUNG ; Hee Jin YANG ; Ji Suk CHOI ; Dong Gyu KIM
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2004;36(6):510-513
The authors present an analysis of papers published on Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society(JKNS) in 2004. There were 217 peer reviewed articles. 118 were clinical articles, 78 were case reports, 17 were laboratory investigations, two were technical reports, and the other two were special articles. This distribution was not statistically different from 2003(p=0.53). Number of English articles was increased with statistical significance (p<0.001). There were 46 English clinical articles, 72 English case reports, nine English laboratory investigations, and so on. The trends in papers on JKNS in 2004 are thought to be desirable ones for JKNS to become an internationally evaluated journal.
Peer Review
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail