1.How to Encourage Best Peer Reviewers: An Empiric Approach.
Omid MAHIAN ; Somchai WONGWISES
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(4):506-506
No abstract available.
Humans
;
*Peer Review, Research
2.Recognizing Our Peer Reviewers of 2012.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2013;46(2):61-61
No abstract available.
Humans
;
*Peer Review, Research
4.Safeguarding the Integrity of Science Communication by Restraining 'Rational Cheating' in Peer Review.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(11):1450-1452
Peer review is the pillar of the integrity of science communication. It is often beset with flaws as well as accusations of unreliability and lack of predictive validity. 'Rational cheating' by reviewers is a threat to the validity of peer review. It may diminish the value of good papers by unfavourable appraisals of the reviewers whose own works have lower scientific merits. This article analyzes the mechanics and defects of peer review and focuses on rational cheating in peer review, its implications, and options to restrain it.
Peer Review, Research/*ethics
;
Societies, Medical/ethics
5.Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(7):970-971
No abstract available.
*Biomedical Research
;
*Peer Review
;
Periodicals as Topic
;
Publishing
6.Authorship and Contributorship in Scholarly Journals.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(6):801-802
No abstract available.
*Authorship
;
Editorial Policies
;
Peer Review, Research
;
Publishing
7.Our Valuable Contributors: Reviewers of 2017.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2018;51(2):63-63
No abstract available.
Periodicals as Topic*
;
Publishing*
;
Peer Review, Research
9.Peer Review.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2010;31(3):169-170
No abstract available.
Peer Review
10.Peer Review System and Right to Reply.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2009;30(9):669-669
No abstract available.
Peer Review
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail