No abstract available.
Child* ; Humans ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate*

No abstract available.
Child* ; Humans ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pulmonary function changes of ozone exposure in Corona and Slitter workers exposed to an ozone level ranging from 0.022~0.061 ppm. METHODS: Forty-two subjects were exposed for 8hrs to ozone every day. We perfomed pulmonary function testing immediately before and after work and self-administered, portable peak flow meter measurements were self-conducted by the workers over a 5-day (Monday to Friday) period. RESULTS: Ozone concentrations in the workplace ranging from 0.050~0.061 ppm at Corona and 0.022~0.023 ppm at Slitter in 2006. A small decrement in forced-vital capacity were observed among Corona workers from 93.9% to 91.3% (p=0.012) and also in employment duration below ten years. We found no significant differences in before and after FVC and FEV1 among Slitter workers. All daily (Monday to Friday) peak expiratory flow rates declined in magnitude after two days of ozone exposure, compared with first day exposure. CONCLUSION: We concluded that daily ozone exposure in the workplace slightly decreased pulmonary function and that PEFR variability is greatest on the 2nd day of ozone exposure.
Employment ; Ozone* ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ; Respiratory Function Tests

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid is most potent and effective anti-inflammatory medication currently available and inhaled form has been used in the long-term control of asthma. Fluticasone propionate(Flixotide/Flovent : FP) is highly potent and topically active inhaled corticosteroid and has at least twice the potency of beclomethasone dipropionate(BDP) in the control of asthma. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of FP and BDP in several aspects. METHOD: Fifty patients with asthma were treated in a randomized, parallel group study of 4 weeks duration. During 2-week run-in period beta2-agonist was administered. After run-in period, FP 500 micro gram/day was administered via Diskhaler or BDP 800 micro gram/day via reservoir dry-power device. During the run-in and treatment period, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate(PEFR) were measured daily. Daytime and night-time asthma symptoms, daytime and night-time rescue bronchodilator use were checked daily. FEV1.0 and FVC were measured biweekly in both groups. RESULTS: Three patients treated with FP and seven patient treated with BDP were dropped out. Therefore forty patients completed the study. Morning and evening PEFR was increased and diurnal variation of PEFR decreased significantly in both groups. FEV1.0 increased significantly in FP treatment group but not in BDP group. There were also improvements in daytime and night-time asthma symptoms, daytime and night-time rescue bronchodilator use in both groups after treatment. there were no significant difference between groups in any of the efficacy parameters. Therapeutic effects were dimonstrated earlier in patient treated with FP than BDP. CONCLUSION: In this study, 500 micro gram/day fluticasone propionate was as effective as 800 micro gram/day beclomethasone dipropionate in the control of asthma. Therapeutic effects were demonstrated earlier in patient treated with FP than BDP without adverse effect.
Asthma ; Beclomethasone* ; Diethylpropion* ; Humans ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ; Fluticasone

BACKGROUND: Portable devices for measuring peak expiratory flow(PEF) are now of proved value in the diagnosis and management of asthma and many lightweight PEF meters have become available. However, it is necessary to determine whether peak expiratory flow rate(PEFR) measurements measured with peak flowmeters is accurate and reproducible for clinical application. The aim of the present study is to define accuracy, agreement, and precision of mini-Wright peak flow meter(MPFM) against standard pneumotachygraph. METHODS: The lung function tests by standard pneumotachygraph and PEFR measurement by MPFM were performed in a random order for 2 hours in 22 normal and 17 asthmatic subjects and also were performed for 3 successive days in 22 normals. RESULTS: The PEFR measured with MPFM was significantly related to the PEFR and FEV1 measured with standard pneumotachygraph in normal and asthmatics(for PEFR, r=0.92 p<0.001; for FEV1, r=0.78 ; p<0.001). The accuracy of MPFM was within 10%(limits of accuracy recommeded by NAEP) in all the subjects or 22 normal, mean difference from standard pneumotachygraph being I 6.5L/min(percentage of difference being 2.90%) or 1 0.6L/min(percentage of difference being 1.75%), respectively. According to the method proposed by Bland and Altman, the 95% limits of the distribution of differences between MPFM and standard pneumotachygraph after correction of PEFR using our regression equation were +38.2 and -71.5L/min in all the subjects or -20.49~ + 9.49L/min in 22 normal and was similar to the intraindividual agreements for 3 successive days in normal. There was no statistically significant difference of PEFR measured with MPFM and standard pneumotachygraph among three days(p>0.05) and the coefficient of variation(2.4 1.2%) of PEFR measured with MPFM was significantly lower than that( 5.2 3.5%) with standard pneurnotachygraph in normal (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This results suggest that the MPFM was as accurate and reproducible as standard pneumotachygraph for monitoring of PEFR in the asthmatic subjects.
Asthma ; Diagnosis ; Flowmeters ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ; Respiratory Function Tests

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown considerable disagreement when using the FEV1 and PEFR to assess the severity of an airflow obstruction. A differential classification of the severity of asthma would lead to serious differences in the evaluation and management of asthma. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the FEV1 and PEFR in asthma patients with mild symptoms. METHODS: In this study, the PEFR and FEV1 were obtained from 92 adult asthma patients with mild symptoms attending an outpatient pulmonary clinic. The mean differences and the limits of agreement in the paired measurements of the FEV1 and PEFR were calculated. RESULTS: There was a considerable correlation between the FEV1 and PEFR measurements when expressed as a % of the predicted values (r=0.686, p<0.01). The 95% limit of agreement (mean difference +/-1.96SD) between the FEV1 % and PEFR % were acceptable(-27.4%~33.8%). In addition, the weighted k(kappa) coefficient for the agreement between the FEV1 % and PEFR % was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.63-0.81), indicating excellent agreement between the two measurements. CONCLUSION: The spirometer (FEV1) and the Mini-Wright peak flow meter (PEFR) can be used interchangeably in adult asthma patients with mild symptom.
Adult ; Asthma* ; Classification ; Humans ; Outpatients ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate*

PURPOSE: To evaluate on the basis of the pulmonary function test the correlation between the extent of air trapping on HRCT with the severity of airway obstruction and also to identify the prognostic effect of the extent of air trapping after treatment of asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty five patients with clinically diagnosed bronchial asthma and air trapping, as seen on HRCT, were included in this study. We quantitatively analysed on HRCT the extent of air trapping and then statistically compared this with the clinical parameters of the pulmonary function test. We classified the patients into two groups on the basis of the pulmonary function test and clinical status : Group 1(N=35), the total number of asthmatic patients ; Group 2(N=18), relatively stable asthmatics without acute asthmatic attack who showed FEV1 of more than 80% of the predicted value. Using the functional parameters of PEFR, one of the objective indications of improvement in airway obstruction, we also classified the patients into three groups on the basis of interval between treatment and clinical improvement. The result of this was as follows ; group 1, asymptomatic group(initial PEFR within normal limit, N=7) ; group 2, early responder(improvement of PEFR within three hospital days, N=18) ; group 3, late responder(improvement of PEFRwithin fourteen hospital days should there be a number here). Using HRCT, we then statistically analysed the differences between the three groups in the extent of air trapping. RESULTS: Among the total of 35 asthmatics, the extent of air trapping on HRCT showed significant correlation with the FEV1(r=-0.6161, p<0.001) and MEFR(r=-0.6012, p<0.001). Among the relatively stable asthmatics who showed FEV1 of more than 80% of the predicted value, MEFR(r=-0.7553, p<0.001) and FEF75(r=-0.7529, p=0.012) showed statistically significant correlation with the extent of air trapping on HRCT, but there was no significant corrlation between air trapping on HRCT and FEV1. In the three groups of asthmatics classified on the basis of interval between treatment and clinical improvement, the extents of air trapping on HRCT in the asymptomatic, early responder and late responder groups was as follows: (mean valuse) 9.31%, 21.50% and 27.89%, respectively ; these differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The extent of air trapping on HRCT in asthmatics showed positive correlation with FEV1 and MEFR. Quantitative analysis of air trapping on HRCT also provides prognostic information about a patient's response to treatment.
Airway Obstruction ; Asthma ; Humans ; Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ; Respiratory Function Tests*

BACKGROUND: An assessment of the presence and the degree of reversibility of airflow obstruction is clinically important in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the time responses of spirometric parameters in response to bronchodilator have not been well investigated. METHODS: We studied 15 patients with asthma. Spirometric and mini-Wright peak expiratory flow measurements were performed at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after using single dose(200 micro gram) of inhaled bronchodilator, salbutamol. RESULTS: The mean values of forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1) and forced vital capicaty(FVC) were significantly increased at 60 minutes after using bronchodilator in comparison to 15 minutes. And peak expiratory flow rate measured by either mass flow sensor or mini-Wright peak flow meter were significantly increased at 45 minutes after using bronchodilator in comparison to 15 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: To appropriate evaluation of the bronchodilator response in patients with reversible airflow limitation, it would be useful measuring either FEV1 or PEF at the later time point 60 or 45 minutes in comparison to 15 minutes after using bronchodilator.
Albuterol* ; Asthma ; Forced Expiratory Volume ; Humans ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

BACKGROUND: Exacerbation of asthma has a negative impact on quality of life and increases the risk of fatal asthma. One of the known risk factors for patients with a history of near-fatal asthma is reduced sensitivity to dyspnea. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify patients with such risk before they experienced severe exacerbation of asthma. METHODS: We analyzed asthma symptoms and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) values of 53 patients recorded daily in a diary over a mean period of 274 days. Patients matched their symptoms to one of eight categories ranging in severity from 'absent' to 'severe attack'. We then analyzed the relationship between PEFR and asthma symptoms by dividing the PEFR value by the values of clinical parameters, including asthma symptom level.
Asthma ; Dyspnea ; Forced Expiratory Volume ; Humans ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ; Quality of Life ; Risk Factors

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and compliance of beta2- agonist according to the type of preparations in the children with asthma. METHODS: Randomly selected 30 patients, who visited to Soonchunhyang University Hospital with acute asthma attack from May to August, 2004 were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups. We evaluated asthma symptom score before and 1 week after treatment in each group. Also, we measured O2 saturation, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), heart rate, and evaluated adverse reactions during the treatment. Treatment compliance was evaluated by the face to face interview with the patients and their guardians after 1 week of treatment. RESULTS: The mean asthma symptom score before and after treatment in each group were 5.9 and 1.1 in transdermal group, 5.4 and 0.9 in inhalation group, and 5.5 and 1.3 in oral group, respectively. Mean improvement of PEFR was 23.7% predicted after treatment. There was no serious adverse reactionin each group except mild itching of patch site in one case of transdermal group. Compliance of each group was relatively good. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of acute asthma attack, there was no difference in efficacy and safety of beta-agonist among the type of preparations. Also, there was no difference in adverse reaction and compliance between the type of preparation. Therefore it will be useful to choose the preparation with better compliance in each patient for the effective treatment of childhood asthma.
Asthma* ; Child ; Compliance* ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Inhalation ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ; Pruritus