Since 1990, descriptive studies about the concept of client advocacy have been published in the health journals. However, empirical studies of the concept are still lacking. There are not enough bases to apply the concept of client advocacy in nursing practice. The purpose of this paper is to encourage empirical research about client advocacy by clarification of the concept and to discusses application of the theory in child healthcare. The literature was reviewed that empirical studies on client advocacy conducted after the year 2000. The changing trends in the client advocacy concept was examined; it was changed from the philosophical concept to nursing action and changed from individual advocacy to collective advocacy, with the rise of the self advocacy concept. The research trends on client advocacy evolves from descriptive study to quasi-experimental study and instrument development study, with diversification and expansion of research methods, advocates, clients and settings. The advocacy role of the nurse in child healthcare is significant due to the child's lack of self determination ability. In ill child care, the application of individual advocacy is potent, while in healthy child care, collective advocacy, policy advocacy, and social advocacy is effective.
Child ; Child Care ; Delivery of Health Care ; Empirical Research ; Humans ; Patient Advocacy ; Personal Autonomy

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care (PCC) and integrative care approach are widely advocated. However, their implementation usually requires an extended consultation time. Despite significant advances in medical diagnosis and treatment, no studies have examined consultation time and patient centeredness in Korea. METHODS: We conducted a “15-Minute Consultation” for first-time patients in outpatient clinics of 13 departments. A control group was selected from the same physicians' first-time patients, adjusting for age and gender. A total of 275 patients were selected for receiving in-depth consultation and 141 control patients were selected for regular consultation. Data were collected from patients using a questionnaire comprising a patient-centeredness scale and items on potential predictors such as socio-demographic and clinical factors. We also investigated the participating physician's professionalism. RESULTS: As compared to the control group, the in-depth consultation group scored higher on 5 variables associated with PCC, including (patients' perception of) medical professionals, wait and consultation times, treatment, patient advocacy, and patient satisfaction. While 92.4% of patients in the in-depth consultation group reported that the consultation time was sufficient, only 69.0% of those in the control group reported the same (P < 0.01). In the in-depth consultation group, scores on satisfaction level were the highest for the department of internal medicine, followed by departments of surgery and pediatrics. Participating physicians' improved satisfaction following the intervention proved that in-depth consultation facilitated building a rapport with patients. CONCLUSION: This study illustrated that the provision of sufficiently long consultation for serious and rare diseases could improve PCC and physicians' professionalism. Health authorities should reshuffle the healthcare delivery system and provide sufficient consultation time to ensure PCC and medical professionalism.
Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Delivery of Health Care ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Korea ; Outpatients ; Patient Advocacy ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patient-Centered Care ; Pediatrics ; Professionalism ; Rare Diseases ; Tertiary Care Centers

PURPOSE: This descriptive study aimed to compare the perception of the acceptable foods for the neutropenic diet between nurses and patients by food type. METHODS: The participants were 225 nurses working at chemotherapy wards and 71 patients in chemotherapy treatment. Data were collected with a self-administered questionnaire from January 2 to February 24, 2012, and analyzed with SPSS 12.0 program using descriptive statistics and the chi2-test. RESULTS: Eighty-eight point eight percent of nurses and 76.1% of cancer patients thought the patients needed the neutropenic diets. The most important decisional criteria to determine dietary restriction was neutrophil count for nurses and food type for patients. The two groups showed significantly different allowance to raw fruits and raw vegetables, sterilized canned juice, fried vegetables, yogurt, uncooked tofu, salted fish, cooked fish, cooked shellfish, uncooked grain powder, jellified food, home-made bread/cookies, nuts including peanuts, instant coffee or tea and tea brewed. In general, patients were more permissive about the neutropenic diet than nurses. CONCLUSION: It is recommended to consider patients' preference as well as nurses' professional knowledge and publish standardized clinical diet guidelines for neutropenic patients with collaboration between nurses and patient representatives.
Arachis ; Edible Grain ; Coffee ; Cooperative Behavior ; Diet* ; Drug Therapy ; Fruit ; Humans ; Neutropenia ; Neutrophils ; Nuts ; Patient Advocacy ; Shellfish ; Soy Foods ; Tea ; Vegetables ; Yogurt

The aging process is linked to changes in the physiological function of organs and changes in body composition that alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs and pharmacodynamic responses. Comorbidity and polypharmacy in the elderly decreases tolerability of drugs, leading to greater vulnerability to adverse drug reactions than that observed in younger adults. In geriatric pharmacotherapy, the general recommendation is dose reduction and slow titration, which is based on pharmacokinetic considerations and concern for adverse drug reactions, rather than clinical trial data. Older patients are under-represented in clinical trials. In the absence of evidence, extrapolation of risk-benefit ratios from younger adults to geriatric populations is not necessarily valid. Sound evidence through prospective clinical trials is essential, and geriatric societies, governments, and patient advocacy groups should collaborate to promote the inclusion of older people in clinical trials. It is believed that all involved in clinical trials have both an obligation and an opportunity to eliminate age discrimination in clinical trial practice.
Adult ; Aged* ; Ageism ; Aging ; Body Composition ; Comorbidity ; Drug Therapy ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Geriatrics ; Humans ; Patient Advocacy ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology, Clinical* ; Polypharmacy

Medical reports are required to support court applications to appoint a deputy to make decisions on behalf of a person who has lost mental capacity. The doctor writing such a medical report needs to be able to systematically assess the mental capacity of the person in question, in order to gather the necessary evidence for the court to make a decision. If the medical report is not adequate, the application will be rejected and the appointment of the deputy delayed. This article sets out best practices for performing the assessment and writing the medical report, common errors, and issues of concern.
Documentation ; Humans ; Mental Competency ; legislation & jurisprudence ; Patient Advocacy ; legislation & jurisprudence ; Physicians ; legislation & jurisprudence ; Proxy ; legislation & jurisprudence ; Singapore ; Third-Party Consent ; legislation & jurisprudence ; Vulnerable Populations ; legislation & jurisprudence ; Writing