1.Sonography of male breast lesions and the pathological diagnosis: a retrospective study of 10 years and literature review.
Haina ZHAO ; Yulan PENG ; Parajuly Shyam SUNDAR ; Honghao LUO ; Yushuang HE ; Lei YU
Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2014;31(1):81-84
The sonographic features of male breast lesions, which underwent ultrasound examination in our hospital for the past 10 years, were retrospectively analyzed. Sonographic features of these lesions were standardized as BI RADS image lexicon. The differences in ultrasonic malignant signs were assessed between the benign and the malig nant diseases. Between the two groups, incomplete boundary was statistically different. The specificity was above 95% within the two groups in terms of speculated margin, echogenic halo, calcification, axillary lymphadenopathy, thickening of skin and eccentric of mass to the nipple. High-frequency sonographic examination has a high level of differential diagnosis for male breast lesions.
Breast
;
pathology
;
Breast Neoplasms, Male
;
diagnosis
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Ultrasonography, Mammary
2.A multicenter study to confirm further diagnostic value of strain ratio method giving to 5-point scoring by elastography for differentiation of breast lesions
Bing OU ; Jiayi WU ; Xinchuan ZHOU ; Jiyi YAO ; Ming LIANG ; Baoming LUO ; Hui ZHI ; Yulan PENG ; Parajuly Sundar SHYAM
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography 2017;26(10):867-871
Objective To confirm whether strain ratio should be added after evaluation of lesions with 5-point elasticity scoring for differentiating breast lesions on ultrasonic elastography(UE).Methods Eight hundred and forty-six consecutive female patients with 1 071 breast lesions were recruited into a multicenter retrospective study,which involved 8 centers across China.All the patients underwent the UE procedure and the strain ratios were calculated.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,PPV and NPV were calculated for each of the two evaluation systems and the areas under the ROC curve were compared.Results The strain ratios of 559 benign lesions(2.7±1.4)and 512 malignant lesions(8.1±5.9)were significantly different (P<0.001).When the cutoff point was 3.03,strain ratio method had 81.6% sensitivity,89.7% specificity,81.7% accuracy,80.2% PPV and 84.2% NPV.The areas under the ROC curve with the strain ratio method and 5-point scoring method were 0.865 and 0.862,respectively(P =0.622).For the lesions with elasticity score 3 and 4,the areas under the ROC curve of the two Methods were 0.71 1 and 0.629, respectively(P = 0.020).Conclusions Although the two UE Methods have similar diagnostic performance,separate calculation of the strain ratios seems compulsory,especially for the lesions with elasticity score 3 and 4.