1.Does Anastomosis Configuration Influence Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Crohn Disease?.
Parajuli ANUJ ; Yong Sik YOON ; Chang Sik YU ; Jong Lyul LEE ; Chan Wook KIM ; In Ja PARK ; Seok Byung LIM ; Jin Cheon KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2017;33(5):173-177
PURPOSE: In this study, we evaluated the role of various anastomoses in surgical recurrence for patients with Crohn disease (CD). METHODS: We analyzed data retrospectively from consecutive laparotomy cases involving complicated CD between 1991 and 2008. Clinical data were compared in terms of reoperation-free survival (RFS) according to the types of anastomoses, the materials used for the anastomoses, and the operating surgeon. RESULTS: Of 233 patients with entero-enteric or entero-colic anastomoses, 199 (85%), 11 (5%), and 23 (10%) experienced side-to-side (SS), side-to-end (SE), and end-to-end (EE) anastomoses, respectively. The SS group had the following characteristics: more extensive bowel involvement, frequent obstruction, and greater stapler use; the SS anastomoses were also frequently made by specialized surgeons (P < 0.001–0.004). EE anastomoses were frequently made by general surgeons using a hand-sewing technique (P < 0.001). No differences in RFS were noted among the 3 groups according to the type of anastomosis and the operating surgeon. However, the hand-sewn group showed better RFS than the stapler group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The roles of the anastomotic configuration, the material used, and the operating surgeon were not significantly correlated with reoperations or complications in our retrospective CD cohort, irrespective of the higher risk of anastomosis site stricture for EE anastomoses.
Cohort Studies
;
Constriction, Pathologic
;
Crohn Disease*
;
Humans
;
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
;
Laparotomy
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Surgeons
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Sensitivity of Various Evaluating Modalities for Predicting a Pathologic Complete Response After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Sungwoo JUNG ; Anuj PARAJULI ; Chang Sik YU ; Seong Ho PARK ; Jong Seok LEE ; Ah Young KIM ; Jong Lyul LEE ; Chan Wook KIM ; Yong Sik YOON ; In Ja PARK ; Seok Byung LIM ; Jin Cheon KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2019;35(5):275-281
PURPOSE: We investigated the sensitivity of various evaluating modalities in predicting a pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: From a population of 2,247 LARC patients who underwent PCRT followed by surgery at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea from January 2007 to June 2016, we retrospectively analyzed 313 patients (14.1%) who showed a pCR after surgery. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT), and endoscopy were performed within 2 weeks prior to surgery. RESULTS: Of the 313 patients analyzed, 256 (81.8%) had a pCR after radical surgery and 57 (18.2%) showed total regression after local excision. Preoperative TRUS, MRI, and AP-CT were performed in 283, 305, and 139 patients, respectively. Among these 3 groups, a prediction of a pCR of the primary tumor was made in 41 (14.5%), 51 (16.7%), and 27 patients (19.4%), respectively, before surgery. A prediction of a clinical N0 stage was made in 204 patients (88.3%) using TRUS, 130 (52.2%) using MRI, and 78 (65.5%) using AP-CT. Of the 211 patients who underwent endoscopy, 87 (41.2%) had a mention of clinical CR in their records. A prediction of a pathologic CR was made for 124 patients (39.6%) through at least one diagnostic modality. CONCLUSION: The various evaluation methods for predicting a pCR after PCRT show a predictive sensitivity of 0.15–0.41 for primary tumors and 0.52–0.88 for lymph nodes. Endoscopy is a relatively superior modality for predicting the pCR of the primary tumor of LARC patients.
Chungcheongnam-do
;
Endoscopy
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Rectal Neoplasms
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Seoul
;
Ultrasonography