Objective: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients under primary care in Hong Kong was yet to be explored. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of AF in patients with DM so as to provide evidence-based recommendations to incorporate AF screening as a component in regular diabetic risk and complication assessment. The performance of automated BP machine Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB as a screening tool for the detection of AF was also evaluated.Method This was a cross-sectional study. Patients with type 2 DM who attended the regular diabetic risk and complication assessment in the participating clinics from 24 August 2021 to 27 January 2022 were recruited. Blood pressure measurement by Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB and 12-lead ECGs were performed for AF screening. Results: Among 2015 DM patients in primary care, the prevalence of AF was found to be 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–2.6). The prevalence of AF increased with age, from 0.5% in patients aged < 65 years, to 2.2% in patients aged 65–74 years and 4.3% in patients aged ≥ 75 years. The sensitivity and specificity of Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB to detect AF were 80% (95% Cl 61.8–92.3) and 97.9%. (95% CI 97.3–98.5), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 32.8% (95% CI 21.9–45.1) and 99.7% (95% CI 99.5–99.9) respectively. Conclusions AF screening with the use of Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB is a simple procedure and can be considered as a standard assessment in the regular comprehensive diabetic risk and complication assessment in primary care setting.

INTRODUCTIONTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an effective treatment for high-risk or inoperative patients with severe aortic stenosis. Given the unique characteristics of Asian populations, questions regarding mid-term outcomes in Asians undergoing TAVI have yet to be addressed. We evaluated the two-year clinical outcomes of TAVI in an Asian population using Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions.

METHODSThis prospective study recruited 59 patients from a major academic medical centre in Singapore. The main outcomes were two-year survival rates, peri-procedural complications, symptom improvement, valvular function and assessment of learning curve.

RESULTSMean age was 76.8 years (61.0% male), mean body surface area 1.6 mand mean logistic EuroSCORE 18.7%. Survival was 93.2%, 86.0% and 79.1% at 30 days, one year and two years, respectively. At 30 days post TAVI, the rate of stroke was 1.7%, life-threatening bleeding 5.1%, acute kidney injury 25.0%, major vascular complication 5.1%, and new permanent pacemaker implantation 6.8%. 29.3% of TAVI patients were rehospitalised (47.1% cardiovascular-related) within one year. These composite outcomes were measured: device success (93.2%); early safety (79.7%); clinical efficacy (66.1%); and time-related valve safety (84.7%). Univariate analysis found these predictors of two-year all-cause mortality: logistic EuroSCORE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07; p < 0.001); baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.97; p = 0.048); and acute kidney injury (HR 5.33; p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis identified non-transfemoral TAVI as a predictor of cardiovascular-related two-year mortality (HR 14.64; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONDespite the unique clinical differences in Asian populations, this registry demonstrated favourable mid-term clinical and safety outcomes in Asians undergoing TAVI.