2.The guideline for prevention and treatment of common complications after pancreatic surgery (2022).
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2023;61(7):1-18
In order to further standardize the prevention and treatment of postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery, the editorial board of the Chinese Journal of Surgery organized relevant experts to formulate this guideline under the promotion of the Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery in China Society of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association and Pancreatic Disease Committee of China Research Hospital Association. According to the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation system, this guide discusses the hot issues on postoperative complications such as pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, chylous fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, abdominal infection, delayed gastric emptying, etc., quantitatively evaluates the level of evidence in clinical studies, and forms recommendations after repeatedly consulting. It is hoped to provide reference for pancreatic surgeons in the prevention and treatment of postoperative complications.
Humans
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Pancreatectomy/adverse effects*
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects*
;
Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control*
;
China
3.Analysis of influencing factors on surgical outcome and exploration of technical principles during pancreaticojejunostomy.
Jian Qi WANG ; Mei Li FAN ; Hong Chi JIANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2022;60(3):219-222
Pancreaticojejunostomy is the most common anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy and middle pancreatectomy. The detailed surgical technics of pancreaticojejunostomy vary dramatically, but none of them can achieve zero fistula rate. In recent years,with the development of new surgical concept,application of new surgical technology, high-tech materials and instruments,the incidence of pancreatic fistula has decreased. At the same time,researches on investigating the risk factors of pancreaticojejunostomy are gradually deepening. Based on years of surgical experience on pancreaticojejunostomy and current literatures, this paper analyzes the factors affecting the effect of pancreaticojejunostomy, such as the patient's basic physical state,pancreatic texture and diameter of the pancreatic duct,pathology and course of the disease,surgical technology and perioperative management,and summarizes six technical principles for pancreaticojejunostomy to be shared with surgical comrades:appropriate tension,protection of blood supply,hermetic closure of pancreatic section,accurate connection of pancreatic duct and intestinal mucosa,individualization,learning and accumulation of experience.
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects*
;
Humans
;
Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control*
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects*
;
Pancreaticojejunostomy/adverse effects*
;
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*
;
Treatment Outcome
4.The value and controversy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Tao Yuan YIN ; Hang ZHANG ; Min WANG ; Ren Yi QIN
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2022;60(10):894-899
Pancreatic cancer was considered to be one of the contraindications of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, but a large number of studies have shown that laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible for surgeons who have passed the learning curve in high-volume hospitals.Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy can provide high-resolution intraoperative exploration and unique operative perspective,which can help to reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications,dissect lymph nodes more thoroughly and reduce intraoperative metastasis of tumors,so as to promote the development of postoperative adjuvant therapy and improve patients' quality of life.However,due to the long learning curve and unclear survival outcome, the application of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer is still controversial.This article summarizes the existing literature and the experience of the author's team,exploring the value and controversy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.Further,suggestions are put forward on how to improve the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in China.
Humans
;
Laparoscopy/adverse effects*
;
Operative Time
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology*
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects*
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Quality of Life
;
Retrospective Studies
5.Factors associated with post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage: 303 consecutive cases analysis.
Qing-Xiang GAO ; Hua-Yu LEE ; Wen-Han WU ; Song GAO ; Yin-Mo YANG ; Irene Teting MA ; Meng-Shan CAI
Chinese Medical Journal 2012;125(9):1571-1575
BACKGROUNDBecause of the complexity and severity of the surgery and its associated complications, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially the hemorrhage post-PD. Exploring the factors associated with post-PD hemorrhage is very important for the patients' safety.
METHODSClinical data from 303 cases of PD between January 1998 and December 2008 were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTSThe overall mortality rate was 4.95% (15/303). However, post-operative bleeding occurred in 25 patients (8.25%) with nine episodes resulting in death (36.00%). Univariate analysis was performed and identified tumor size, Child's classification, total pancreatic uncinatic process resection, and pancreatic leakage as significant risk factors for post-PD hemorrhage. In the severe hemorrhage group, incomplete resection of uncinate process of pancreas and pancreatic leakage were the main causes. The multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that each of these variables is an independent risk factor.
CONCLUSIONSPrimary prevention of bleeding complications depends on total pancreatic uncinatic process resection and meticulous hemostatic techniques during surgery. In addition, several peri-operative factors were found to contribute to post-PD bleeding.
Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; adverse effects ; mortality ; Postoperative Hemorrhage ; etiology ; Risk Factors
6.Clinical analysis of 18 cases with postsurgical gastroparesis syndrome after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Xiao-ling NI ; Wen-hui LOU ; Da-yong JING ; Xin-yu QIN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2008;11(6):586-587
OBJECTIVETo investigate the prevention and treatment for postsurgical gastroparesis syndrome (PGS) after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODSThe data of 18 PGS cases after pancreaticoduodenectomy were analyzed.
RESULTSPGS of these 18 patients occurred within 4-10 days after operation. All of the PGS patients were cured with mean 25.4 days by conservative therapy and no one received re-operation. PGS was closely associated with the operation procedure (chi(2)=3.90, P<0.05)and postoperative complications (chi(2)=3.92, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONSIncidence of PGS can be decreased by improvement of surgical procedure and prevention of abdominal complications. PGS can be cured by conservative therapy generally. Re-operation should be avoided.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Gastroparesis ; etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications
7.Is there comparable morbidity in pylorus-preserving and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy? A meta-analysis.
Qi-jun CHEN ; Zhi-qiang HE ; Yan YANG ; Yu-shun ZHANG ; Xing-lin CHEN ; Hong-ji YANG ; Shi-Kai ZHU ; Ping-yong ZHONG ; Chong YANG ; He-shui WU
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) 2015;35(6):793-800
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the most effective treatment for patients with pancreatic head or periampullary lesions. Two major strategies exist: pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD). However, it is yet unclear regarding the morbidity after PPPD and PRPD. This study analyzed the morbidity after PPPD and PRPD to determine the optimal surgical treatment of masses in the pancreatic head or periampullary region. A systematic search of databases identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science was performed. Outcome was compared by postoperative morbidity including overall morbidity, pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) rate between PPPD and PRPD. The DGE rate in the PRPD subgroups (conventional PD [CPD] and subtotal stomach-preserving PD [SSPPD], respectively) was also analyzed. The results showed that 9 RCTs including 722 participants were included for meta-analysis. Among these RCTs, 7 manuscripts described PRPD as CPD, and 2 manuscripts described PRPD as SSPPD. There were no significant differences in the overall morbidity, pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, or biliary leakage between PPPD and PRPD. There was a lower rate of DGE with PRPD than that with PPPD (RR=2.15, P=0.03, 95% CI, 1.09-4.23). Further subgroup analysis indicated a comparable DGE rate for the CPD but a lower DGE rate for the SSPPD group than the PPPD group. However, the result did not indicate any difference between CPD and SSPPD regarding the DGE rate (P=0.92). It is suggested that PPPD is comparable to PRPD in overall morbidity, pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding and biliary leakage. The current data are not sufficient to draw a conclusion regarding which surgical procedure is associated with a lower postoperative DGE rate. Our conclusions were limited by the available data. Further evaluations of RCTs are needed.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Humans
;
Middle Aged
;
Morbidity
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
Pylorus
;
surgery
8.Surgical management of pancreatic cancer: current practice and future prospect.
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2005;27(5):556-559
Pancreatic cancer still represents a serious medical concern for which no adequate solution has thus far been found. Surgical resection, when possible, remains the primary treatment modality and can result in long-term cure. The value of more radical resection remains open to debate, despite the negative results of some recent randomized trials with standard vs. extended lymphadenectomy. More effective patient selection, more rational resection, and more compositive treatment should be emphasized in management strategies. In the future, appropriately designed randomized trials of standard vs. extended resections may confirm the benefit of extended surgical resections. In addition, well powered trials of adjuvant therapies strategies together with surgical resections may identify more effective combinations, which may improve the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.
Humans
;
Lymph Node Excision
;
methods
;
Pancreatectomy
;
methods
;
trends
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms
;
pathology
;
surgery
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
;
adverse effects
;
methods
9.Meta-analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy prospective controlled trials: pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction.
Jin-Ping MA ; Lin PENG ; Tao QIN ; Jian-Wei LIN ; Chuang-Qi CHEN ; Shi-Rong CAI ; Liang WANG ; Yu-Long HE
Chinese Medical Journal 2012;125(21):3891-3897
BACKGROUNDPancreaticogastrostomy (PG) has been proposed as an alternative to pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), assuming that postoperative complications are less frequent. The aim of this research was to compare the safety of PG with PJ reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODSArticles of prospective controlled trials published until the end of December 2010 comparing PJ and PG after PD were searched by means of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases, and Chinese Biomedical Database. After quality assessment of all included prospective controlled trials, meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0 for statistic analysis.
RESULTSOverall, six articles of prospective controlled trials were included. Of the 866 patients analyzed, 440 received PG and 426 were treated by PJ. Meta-analysis of six prospective controlled trials (including RCT and non-randomized prospective trial) revealed significant difference between PJ and PG regarding postoperative complication rates (OR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.30 - 0.95; P = 0.03), pancreatic fistula (OR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.22 - 0.97; P = 0.04), and intra-abdominal fluid collection (OR, 0.42; 95%CI, 0.25 - 0.72; P = 0.001). The difference in mortality was of no significance. Meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials (RCT) revealed significant difference between PJ and PG regarding intra-abdominal fluid collection (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26 - 0.79; P = 0.005). The differences in pancreatic fistula, postoperative complications, delayed gastric emptying, and mortality were of no significance.
CONCLUSIONSMeta-analysis of six prospective controlled trials (including randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-randomized prospective trial) revealed significant difference between PJ and PG regarding overall postoperative complications, pancreatic fistula, and intra-abdominal fluid collection. Meta-analysis of four RCT revealed significant difference between PJ and PG with regard to intra-abdominal fluid collection. The results suggest that PG may be as safe as PJ.
Female ; Gastric Emptying ; Gastrostomy ; adverse effects ; mortality ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; adverse effects ; mortality ; Pancreaticojejunostomy ; adverse effects ; mortality ; Prospective Studies ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
10.The diagnosis and management strategies for gastrointestinal hemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Hong-qiao GAO ; Yan ZHUANG ; Xiao-dong TIAN ; Guang-dong WU ; Yin-mo YANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2013;51(8):685-687
OBJECTIVETo analyze the causes and clinical features of gastrointestinal hemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and to provide the management strategies for this complication.
METHODSThe clinic data of 412 patients who underwent PD from January 2000 to April 2010 was retrospectively reviewed. There were 232 male and 180 female patients, average age was (60 ± 12) years. The mode of procedure was standard PD and the Child's reconstruction of digestive tract, whose anastomosic steps encluded gastroenterostomy following chlangioenterostomy and pancreaticoenterostomy, was employed. Etiology of gastrointestinal haemorrhage, diagnostic methods and treatment strategy was recorded and analyzed.
RESULTSThe postoperative mobidity was 37.1% (153/412), the rate of haemorrhagic complications was 6.6% (27/412), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage was recorded in 11 patients (2.7%). The bleeding rate of pancreaticointestinal anastomosis and gastricointestinal anastomosis were 5/11 and 4/11, respectively. Among these 11 patients, early hemorrhage occurred in 6 patients, 7 patients were due to technical failure. In order to control this kind of complication, open abdominal operation alone was performed on 4 patients, endoscopic management was performed on 3 patients and succeeded in 2 patients, vascular interventional therapy was performed on 5 patients and succeeded in 2 patients, and Re-laparotomy following vascular interventional therapy was performed on 2 patients successfully.
CONCLUSIONSGastrointestinal hemorrhage following PD always occurred in early stage and reliable hemostasis during operation is the key points for prevention. Angiography is minimally invasive and holds the diagnostic value. Timely and decisive reoperation is an important method to management of postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Aged ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; adverse effects ; Postoperative Hemorrhage ; therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome