No abstract available.
Child, Preschool ; Cysts/pathology ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Humans ; Pancreatic Diseases/*diagnosis/pathology/ultrasonography ; Pancreatic Ducts/pathology ; Stomach Diseases/*diagnosis/pathology/ultrasonography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

An epidermoid cyst arising from intrapancreatic accessory spleen (ECIPAS) is a rare disease. Most patients with an ECIPAS are detected incidentally and could be misdiagnosed as a pancreatic cystic neoplasm such as mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) or intraductal p ancreatic mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). We described an ECIPAS with high cystic fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), which was misdiagnosed as a MCN of pancreas. Fifty one-year-old female was presented with a 2 cm sized non-enhancing pancreas cystic mass on the outside CT scan. Endoscpic ultrasonography (EUS) guided aspiration was performed. It showed a 2.3 x 1.9 cm unilocular cyst nearby 1.6 x 1.1 cm homogenous hypoechoic mass in pancreas tail, and cystic fluid CEA was 1564.18 ng/mL. On the basis of EUS results with elevated fluid CEA level, the presumptive diagnosis is likely to MCN of pancreas, and she underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The final pathology was the epidermal cyst in the intrapancreatic accessory spleen.
Carcinoembryonic Antigen ; Diagnosis ; Epidermal Cyst* ; Female ; Humans ; Mucins* ; Pancreas* ; Pancreatectomy ; Pancreatic Cyst ; Pathology ; Rare Diseases ; Spleen* ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVETo set up a stand for surgical classification of pancreatic duct stone and evaluate the benefits of different management according to the classification.

METHODSRetrospectively analysis the diagnosis and prognosis of different management of 33 cases pancreatic duct stones to establish a new standard of classification and strategy of management of pancreatic duct stone.

RESULTSAccording to the results of imaging examination (B-US, CT, ERCP) and finding during surgery, pancreatic duct stone can be classified into four different types: Type I: The stones mainly located in the head of pancreas. Endoscopic pancreas drainage and remove of stones is the first line choice of treatment. If it fail the Whipple procedure should be applied. Type II, The stones mainly located in the body of pancreas. It can be treated by Pusetow procedure. Type III, The stones mainly located in the tail of pancreas. The resection of the tail of pancreas or combined with spleenectomy was recommended for the management of this type stones. Type IV, The stones can be found from the head to tail of the main duct of pancreas. The Pusetow-Gillesby procedure or dividing of the neck of pancreas removing stones from both ends of pancreatic duct and reconstructed by two ends pancreatic duct-ileostomy in Roux-en-Y fashion are the choice of management.

CONCLUSIONThe invadulaized strategy of the management based upon correct diagnosis and classification play the most important role in the treatment of pancreatic duct stone.

Adult ; Aged ; Calculi ; classification ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatic Diseases ; classification ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Pancreatic Ducts ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonography

INTRODUCTIONEndoscopic transenteric stenting is the standard treatment for pseudocysts, but it may be inadequate for treating infected collections with solid debris. Surgical necrosectomy results in significant morbidity. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN), a minimally invasive treatment, may be a viable option. This study examined the efficacy and safety of DEN for the treatment of infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis and infected pseudocysts with solid debris.

METHODSThis study was a retrospective analysis of data collected from a prospective database of patients who underwent DEN in the presence of infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis or infected pseudocysts with solid debris from April 2007 to October 2011. DEN was performed as a staged procedure. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transgastric stenting was performed during the first session for initial drainage and to establish endoscopic access to the infected collection. In the second session, the drainage tract was dilated endoscopically to allow transgastric passage of an endoscope for endoscopic necrosectomy. Outcome data included technical success, clinical success and complication rates.

RESULTSEight patients with infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis or infected pseudocysts with solid debris (mean size 12.5 cm; range 7.8-17.2 cm) underwent DEN. Underlying aetiologies included severe acute pancreatitis (n = 6) and post-pancreatic surgery (n = 2). DEN was technically successful in all patients. Clinical resolution was achieved in seven patients. One patient with recurrent collection opted for surgery instead of repeat endotherapy. No procedural complications were encountered.

CONCLUSIONDEN is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis and infected pseudocysts.

Adult ; Aged ; Cysts ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; Endoscopy ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Necrosis ; Pancreas ; pathology ; Pancreatic Diseases ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; therapy ; Singapore ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography