This research was carried out in order to study the effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion on maxilla and it's surrounding skeletal structures. The sample for this study consists of 14 patients who were in retention period after rapid maxillary expansion. Following results were obtained after performing comparative analysis of cephalograms taken before and after rapid maxillary expansion. 1. In almost every cases, inferior displacement of palatal planes with concurrent changes in their inclination were observed. 2. Changes in the inclination of palatal plane can be categorized into inferiorly inclined group, superiorly inclined group and constant group in relation to the states before rapid masillary expansion. 3. Decrease in < Se-FMN/PMV and increase in < Se-FMN-A were evident in the superiorly inclined group and vice versa for the inferiorly inclined group.
Humans ; Maxilla ; Palatal Expansion Technique* ; Recurrence*

This is a case report of a 12.5-year-old girl who presented with moderate to severe anterior dental crowding and rotations. Treatment involved no extraction, but expansion of both the maxillary and the mandibular arches. Maxillary expansion was assisted by rapid palatal expansion despite the fact that this patient did not present with posterior crossbite. Crowding and rotations in both arches were corrected and good occlusal function and improved facial esthetic were achieved, with acceptable overbite and overjet. The application of rapid maxillary expansion in cases with no posterior crossbite, which has increased in recent years, calls for re-evaluation of the diagnostic basis and indications for the use of this technique.
Female ; Humans ; Malocclusion* ; Overbite ; Palatal Expansion Technique

As a research method that weighs and combines evidence, meta analysis produces evidence that is more powerful than the original studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the intercanine/intermolar expansion and rapid/slow expansion in the maxillary expansion treatment using meta analysis. Medline was searched from 1979 to 2000 for all studies examining the stability of transverse expansion of the human maxilla, and 388 articles were found. Then these articles were reduced to 7 based on the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a cumulative Meta evaluation score was computed for each study. The results were as follows; 1. The mean expansion in intermolar width was 6.0mm. Of the 6.0mm, 4.8mm was retained and 20.0%(1.2mm) was relapsed while wearing retainers. 2. In intercanines width, the mean expansion was 3.7mm. Of the 3.7mm, 2.6mm was retained and 29.7%(1.1mm) was relapsed while wearing retainers. 3. The differences in the amount of expansion and relapse between rapid expansion group and slow expansion group were less than 6%(0.1-0.3mm). But, there might be differences in the skeletal/dental exapnsion ratios according to the expansion method.
Humans ; Maxilla ; Palatal Expansion Technique* ; Recurrence

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze initial displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during dentoskeletal maxillary protraction with various appliance designs placed on the palatal region by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. METHODS: Six models of maxillary protraction were developed: conventional facemask (Type A), facemask with dentoskeletal hybrid anchorage (Type B), facemask with a palatal plate (Type C), intraoral traction using a Class III palatal plate (Type D), facemask with a palatal plate combined with rapid maxillary expansion (RME; Type E), and Class III palatal plate intraoral traction with RME (Type F). In Types A, B, C, and D, maxillary protraction alone was performed, whereas in Types E and F, transverse expansion was performed simultaneously with maxillary protraction. RESULTS: Type C displayed the greatest amount of anterior dentoskeletal displacement in the sagittal plane. Types A and B resulted in similar amounts of anterior displacement of all the maxillofacial landmarks. Type D showed little movement, but Type E with expansion and the palatal plate displayed a larger range of movement of the maxillofacial landmarks in all directions. CONCLUSIONS: The palatal plate served as an effective skeletal anchor for use with the facemask in maxillary protraction. In contrast, the intraoral use of Class III palatal plates showed minimal skeletal and dental effects in maxillary protraction. In addition, palatal expansion with the protraction force showed minimal effect on the forward movement of the maxillary complex.
Finite Element Analysis* ; Palatal Expansion Technique ; Traction

Humans ; Nasal Cavity ; surgery ; Palatal Expansion Technique

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the 3-dimensional (3D) superimposition method of digital models in patients who received treatment with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and maxillary protraction headgear. METHODS: The material consisted of pre- and post-treatment maxillary dental casts and lateral cephalograms of 30 patients, who underwent RME and maxillary protraction headgear treatment. Digital models were superimposed using the palate as a reference area. The movement of the maxillary central incisor and the first molar was measured on superimposed cephalograms and 3D digital models. To determine whether any difference existed between the 2 measuring techniques, intra-class correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were analyzed. RESULTS: The measurements on the 3D digital models and cephalograms showed a very high correlation in the antero-posterior direction (ICC, 0.956 for central incisor and 0.941 for first molar) and a moderate correlation in the vertical direction (ICC, 0.748 for central incisor and 0.717 for first molar). CONCLUSIONS: The 3D model superimposition method using the palate as a reference area is as clinically reliable for assessing antero-posterior tooth movement as cephalometric superimposition, even in cases treated with orthopedic appliances, such as RME and maxillary protraction headgear.
Humans ; Incisor ; Molar ; Orthopedics ; Palatal Expansion Technique ; Palate ; Tooth Movement

No abstract available.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Maxilla ; Palatal Expansion Technique ; Palate

Problems in the transverse plane of space are seen primarily as posterior crossbites, which may be due to displacement of teeth relative to their supprting bone (dental crossbite), or to a narrow maxilla or wide mandible (skeletal crossbite). It is important to specify, in the sense of the location of the anatomic abnormality, why the crossbite exists. Where a maxillary expansion may be considered as part of a treatment aiming to coordinate the mazillary and mandibular arches. For thr correction of maxillary skeletal constriction, rapid maxillary expansion procedure (RME) is indicated. In this case report, the evaluation of P-A cephalo-grams before, after RME, and after active treatment will serve as a focus.
Constriction ; Malocclusion* ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Palatal Expansion Technique ; Tooth

No abstract available.
Palatal Expansion Technique ; Age Determination by Skeleton ; Orthodontic Appliances

Semi-fixed mandibular lingual arch expansion appliance is composed of a mandibular molar band, a keyway and arch expansion spring. The arch expansion spring are used to expand maxillary arch symmetrically or asymmetrically when bolts of the two ends are inset into keyways. Dental arch expansion appliance for 25 patients with mandibular arch stenosis showed that semi-fixed mandibular lingual arch expansion had good effect and could be used to expand mandibular arch.
Dental Arch ; Humans ; Mandible ; pathology ; Orthodontic Appliances ; Palatal Expansion Technique