OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical effect of maternal voice stimulation in alleviating procedural pain in neonates during heel blood collection. METHODS: A total of 72 neonates who were admitted to the neonate intensive care unit were randomly divided into an intervention group (n=35) and a control group (n=37). Heel blood collection was performed by the routine method in the control group. The intervention group listened to their mothers' voice from 1 minute before heel blood collection to the end of the procedure. Pain score, incidence of crying, and vital signs were recorded before and after heel blood collection. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the heart rate was significantly reduced, the blood oxygen saturation significantly increased, the incidence of crying and the pain score were significantly reduced in the intervention group during the procedure of heel blood collection (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Maternal voice stimulation helps to reduce procedural pain and maintain stable vital signs in neonates.
Crying ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; Mothers ; Pain Management ; Pain, Procedural ; Speech

ObjectiveTo evaluate the analgesic effect of intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA) versus that of periprostatic nerve block anesthesia (PPNB) in initial transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB) for patients with different prostate volumes (PV).

METHODSA total of 253 patients undergoing initial TRUS-PB in our hospital from January 2014 to November 2017 were divided into three PV groups (<50 ml, 50－100 ml, and >100 ml), each again randomized into three subgroups (control, IRLA, and PPNB) with the random number table method. The pain during the procedure was assessed based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and the blind method was used by the biopsy operator, VAS valuator and data analyst.

RESULTSAmong the patients with PV <50 ml, the VAS scores in the blank control, IRLA, and PPNB subgroups were 4.39±0.87, 3.51±0.84 and 3.43±1.07, respectively, remarkably higher in the control than in the IRLA and PPNB groups (P<0.05), but with no statistically significant differences between the latter two (P>0.05). Among those with PV of 50－100 ml, the VAS scores in the three subgroups were 4.50±1.05, 4.38±1.13 and 3.38±1.44, respectively, markedly higher in the control and IRLA than in the PPNB group (P<0.05), but with no statistically significant differences between the former two groups (P>0.05). Among those with PV >100 ml, the VAS scores in the three subgroups were 5.19±1.05, 5.00±1.25 and 4.19±0.91, respectively, remarkably higher in the former two groups than in the latter (P<0.05), but with no statistically significant differences between the former two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONSEither IRLA or PPNB can be recommended for initial TRUS-PB in patients with PV <50 ml, PPNB for those with PV of 50－100 ml, and PPNB with other painkillers for those with PV >100 ml.

Administration, Rectal ; Aged ; Anesthesia, Local ; methods ; Anesthetics, Local ; administration & dosage ; Biopsy ; Humans ; Male ; Nerve Block ; methods ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Procedural ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate ; pathology

ObjectiveTo make a preliminary investigation on the safety and efficacy of focused low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODSWe treated 32 ED patients by focused LI-ESWT with the device of Medispec's ED1000. Before and at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment, we evaluated the erectile function of the patients using the International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function domain (IIEF-EF), Erection Hardness Score (EHS), Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP2 and SEP3), and Global Assessment Questionnaire questions 1 and 2 (GAQ1 and GAQ2), and recorded the incidence rate of adverse events.

RESULTSThe patients averaged 30.69 years of age. Compared with the baseline, the mean IIEF-EF score of the patients was significantly increased at 4 and 12 weeks after LI-ESWT (14.94 vs 20.97 and 21.47, P <0.01), and so were the EHS (1.75 vs 2.66 and 2.56, P <0.01) and the "Yes" answers to SEP2 (21.88% vs 68.75% and 71.88%), SEP3 (0 vs 43.75% and 56.25%), GAQ1 (NA vs 81.25% and 71.88%) and GAQ2 (NA vs 65.63% and 68.75%). The total effectiveness rates at 4 weeks and 12 weeks were 75% and 71.88% respectively. One of the patients felt penile shaft pain with mild ecchymosis after LI-ESWT but was recovered without special treatment a week later.

CONCLUSIONSLI-ESWT can significantly improve the erectile function of ED patients with no obvious adverse effects within 12 weeks after treatment.

Adult ; Double-Blind Method ; Ecchymosis ; etiology ; Erectile Dysfunction ; therapy ; Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Pain, Procedural ; Penile Erection ; physiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To investigate the factors influencing the postoperative resolution of varicocele-associated scrotal pain. METHODS: Using the keywords "varicocele", "testicular pain", "scrotal pain", "painful varicocele", "ligation", and "varicocelectomy", we searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Collaboration's Database, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP Database up to October 2016 for the studies relating to surgical treatment of varicocele-associated scrotal pain. We assessed the quality of the cohort studies included using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and that of the randomized controlled trials included with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. We conducted a meta-analysis using the RevMan software. RESULTS: Finally 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which, 2 involved the history of disease, 8 involved the nature of pain, 2 involved the intensity of pain, 9 involved the grade of varicocele, 3 involved the side of varicocele, 9 involved surgical approaches, 3 involved surgical techniques, and 4 involved postoperative recurrence. The pain resolution rate was significantly higher after subinguinal ligation than after high or inguinal ligation (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76－0.89, P <0.01; RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86－0.99, P = 0.02), and so was it after microsurgery than after laparoscopic varicocelectomy (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60－0.99, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Subinguinal varicocelectomy and microsurgery are more effective options than laparoscopic and high or trans-inguinal ligation of the spermatic vein for resolution of varicocele-associated scrotal pain, while the history of disease, the nature and intensity of pain, the grade and side of varicocele, or postoperative recurrence cannot be regarded as the influencing factors.
Adult ; Genital Diseases, Male ; prevention & control ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Ligation ; Male ; Microsurgery ; Pain, Postoperative ; prevention & control ; Pain, Procedural ; prevention & control ; Recurrence ; Scrotum ; Testis ; Treatment Outcome ; Varicocele ; surgery ; Vascular Surgical Procedures ; Veins