1.Effects of Varicocele Repair on Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Seminal Malondialdehyde Levels in Infertile Men with Clinical Varicocele:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rossella CANNARELLA ; Rupin SHAH ; Ramadan SALEH ; Florence BOITRELLE ; Taha Abo-Almagd Abdel-Meguid HAMODA ; Rajender SINGH ; Gianmaria SALVIO ; Tuncay TOPRAK ; Marco FALCONE ; Murat GUL ; Fotios DIMITRIADIS ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Giorgio I. RUSSO ; Edmund KO ; Armand ZINI ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Nguyen Ho Vinh PHUOC ; Hussein KANDIL ; Ramy Abou GHAYDA ; Ponco BIROWO ; Nazim GHERABI ; Erman CEYHAN ; Jie DONG ; Vineet MALHOTRA ; Damayanthi DURAIRAJANAYAGAM ; Bircan KOLBASI ; Fahmi BAHAR ; Gokhan CALIK ; Selahittin ÇAYAN ; Germar-Michael PINGGERA ; Aldo E. CALOGERO ; Osvaldo RAJMIL ; Taymour MOSTAFA ; Widi ATMOKO ; Ahmed M. HARRAZ ; Tan V. LE ; Jean de la ROSETTE ; Lukman HAKIM ; Edoardo PESCATORI ; Oleg SERGEYEV ; Ayman RASHED ; Pallavi SAINI ; Ashok AGARWAL
The World Journal of Men's Health 2024;42(2):321-337
Purpose:
Varicoceles can be a source of elevated seminal oxidative stress (OS) and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF). However, it remains unclear whether varicocele repair (VR) could reduce these parameters. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) aims to investigate the impact of VR on SDF and seminal malondialdehyde (MDA).
Materials and Methods:
A literature search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases. This SRMA included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting the pre- and postoperative levels of SDF and seminal OS in infertile men with clinical varicocele that underwent VR. Subgroup analyses included techniques of VR and SDF testing. The effect size was expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD).
Results:
Out of 1,632 abstracts assessed for eligibility, 29 studies with 1,491 infertile men were included. The analysis showed a significant reduction in SDF after VR, compared to preoperative values (SMD −1.125, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.410, −0.840; p<0.0001) with high inter-study heterogeneity (I2=90.965%). Reduction in SDF was evident with microsurgical technique and non-microsurgical inguinal approaches (SMD −1.014, 95% CI −1.263, −0.765; p<0.0001, and SMD −1.495, 95% CI −2.116, −0.873; p<0.0001), respectively. Reduction in SDF was significant irrespective of testing was done by sperm chromatin dispersion (SMD −2.197, 95% CI −3.187, −1.207; p<0.0001), sperm chromatin structure assay (SMD −0.857, 95% CI −1.156, −0.559; p<0.0001) or TUNEL (SMD −1.599, 95% CI −2.478, −0.719; p<0.0001). A significant decrease in seminal MDA levels was observed following VR (SMD −2.450, 95% CI −3.903 to −0.997, p=0.001) with high inter-study heterogeneity (I2=93.7%).
Conclusions
Using pre- and post-intervention data, this SRMA indicates a significant reduction in SDF and seminal MDA levels in infertile men with clinical varicocele treated with VR. These findings may have important implications for the future management of this selected group of infertile patients.
2.Consensus and Diversity in the Management of Varicocele for Male Infertility: Results of a Global Practice Survey and Comparison with Guidelines and Recommendations
Rupin SHAH ; Ashok AGARWAL ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Ramadan SALEH ; Rossella CANNARELLA ; Ahmed M. HARRAZ ; Florence BOITRELLE ; Shinnosuke KURODA ; Taha Abo-Almagd Abdel-Meguid HAMODA ; Armand ZINI ; Edmund KO ; Gokhan CALIK ; Tuncay TOPRAK ; Hussein KANDIL ; Murat GÜL ; Mustafa Emre BAKIRCIOĞLU ; Neel PAREKH ; Giorgio Ivan RUSSO ; Nicholas TADROS ; Ates KADIOGLU ; Mohamed ARAFA ; Eric CHUNG ; Osvaldo RAJMIL ; Fotios DIMITRIADIS ; Vineet MALHOTRA ; Gianmaria SALVIO ; Ralf HENKEL ; Tan V. LE ; Emrullah SOGUTDELEN ; Sarah VIJ ; Abdullah ALARBID ; Ahmet GUDELOGLU ; Akira TSUJIMURA ; Aldo E. CALOGERO ; Amr El MELIEGY ; Andrea CRAFA ; Arif KALKANLI ; Aykut BASER ; Berk HAZIR ; Carlo GIULIONI ; Chak-Lam CHO ; Christopher C.K. HO ; Ciro SALZANO ; Daniel Suslik ZYLBERSZTEJN ; Dung Mai Ba TIEN ; Edoardo PESCATORI ; Edson BORGES ; Ege Can SEREFOGLU ; Emine SAÏS-HAMZA ; Eric HUYGHE ; Erman CEYHAN ; Ettore CAROPPO ; Fabrizio CASTIGLIONI ; Fahmi BAHAR ; Fatih GOKALP ; Francesco LOMBARDO ; Franco GADDA ; Gede Wirya Kusuma DUARSA ; Germar-Michael PINGGERA ; Gian Maria BUSETTO ; Giancarlo BALERCIA ; Gianmartin CITO ; Gideon BLECHER ; Giorgio FRANCO ; Giovanni LIGUORI ; Haitham ELBARDISI ; Hakan KESKIN ; Haocheng LIN ; Hisanori TANIGUCHI ; Hyun Jun PARK ; Imad ZIOUZIOU ; Jean de la ROSETTE ; Jim HOTALING ; Jonathan RAMSAY ; Juan Manuel Corral MOLINA ; Ka Lun LO ; Kadir BOCU ; Kareim KHALAFALLA ; Kasonde BOWA ; Keisuke OKADA ; Koichi NAGAO ; Koji CHIBA ; Lukman HAKIM ; Konstantinos MAKAROUNIS ; Marah HEHEMANN ; Marcelo Rodriguez PEÑA ; Marco FALCONE ; Marion BENDAYAN ; Marlon MARTINEZ ; Massimiliano TIMPANO
The World Journal of Men's Health 2023;41(1):164-197
Purpose:
Varicocele is a common problem among infertile men. Varicocele repair (VR) is frequently performed to improve semen parameters and the chances of pregnancy. However, there is a lack of consensus about the diagnosis, indications for VR and its outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore global practice patterns on the management of varicocele in the context of male infertility.
Materials and Methods:
Sixty practicing urologists/andrologists from 23 countries contributed 382 multiple-choice-questions pertaining to varicocele management. These were condensed into an online questionnaire that was forwarded to clinicians involved in male infertility management through direct invitation. The results were analyzed for disagreement and agreement in practice patterns and, compared with the latest guidelines of international professional societies (American Urological Association [AUA], American Society for Reproductive Medicine [ASRM], and European Association of Urology [EAU]), and with evidence emerging from recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Additionally, an expert opinion on each topic was provided based on the consensus of 16 experts in the field.
Results:
The questionnaire was answered by 574 clinicians from 59 countries. The majority of respondents were urologists/ uro-andrologists. A wide diversity of opinion was seen in every aspect of varicocele diagnosis, indications for repair, choice of technique, management of sub-clinical varicocele and the role of VR in azoospermia. A significant proportion of the responses were at odds with the recommendations of AUA, ASRM, and EAU. A large number of clinical situations were identified where no guidelines are available.
Conclusions
This study is the largest global survey performed to date on the clinical management of varicocele for male infertility. It demonstrates: 1) a wide disagreement in the approach to varicocele management, 2) large gaps in the clinical practice guidelines from professional societies, and 3) the need for further studies on several aspects of varicocele management in infertile men.